Rio+20 and forests

Collaborative Partnership on Forests

Rio+20 and forests

The contribution of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests to Rio+20

Year of publication 2012

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 36 p.

Author Collaborative Partnership on Forests

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Document

Edition 1

Full item page

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Book (stand-alone)

Collaborative Partnership on Forests Work Plan 2025–2028
Strategic Directions for Collaborative Forest Action
2025

Also available in:

No results found.

The 2025-2028 work plan of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF) sets forth clear priorities, joint actions, collaborative activities, resource needs, outputs and indicators for assessing progress, for the activities of the CPF. It also ensures that reports of the CPF on the implementation of the work plan to the UNFF and other governing bodies are structured around the Global Forest Goals (GFGs). The CPF Work Plan was developed in line with the quadrennial programme of work of the UN Forum on Forests (UNFF) for the same period following the guidance received from UNFF and other governing bodies of CPF member organizations.
Document

Proceedings of the international expert workshop on strengthening collaboration on criteria and indicators to promote and demonstrate sustainable forest management
May 1–3 2016, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
2016

Also available in:

No results found.

Criteria and indicators have a major role in promoting the implementation of recent global agreements affecting forests, by focusing on measurable results and on follow-up monitoring and reporting. This workshop was the beginning of a broader conversation to enhance the connectedness of sustainable forest management (SFM) indicators and global initiatives related to forests and strengthen the impact of their work.
Book (series)
Sustainable Wildlife Management - Unasylva 249 2017

Also available in:

French
Spanish

Wildlife management is the focus of considerable international debate because of its importance for biodiversity conservation, human safety, livelihoods and food security. Local people have been managing wildlife for millennia, including through hunting. Sufficient examples are presented in this edition to show that sustainable wildlife management is also feasible in the modern era. In some cases, a sustainable offtake – by local people, trophy hunters and legitimate wildlife traders – is provin g vital to obtain local buy-in to wildlife management and to pay the costs of maintaining habitats. No doubt the debate will continue on the best ways to manage wildlife; this edition of Unasylva is a contribution to that.