Sustainable bioenergy in Asia

Damen, B. (ed.); Tvinnereim, S. (ed.);Forestry Group

Sustainable bioenergy in Asia

Improving resilience to high food prices and climate change

Year of publication 2012

Pages 124 p.

Author Damen, B. (ed.); Tvinnereim, S. (ed.);Forestry Group

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Book (stand-alone)

ISBN 978-925-107291-2

Series title RAP Publication

Series number 1020-6221|1014-2789|18194591|0428-9560

Edition 1

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) A common critique of bioenergy production as an alternative energy source is that it makes use of the same natural resources that could otherwise be used in food production, with negative impacts on food prices and food security. A range of existing bioenergy operations, however, have demonstrated that competition between food and bioenergy production can be minimized or even eliminated. Greater effort is required to highlight these exemplary bioenergy systems and identify ways to further promot e them. The FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, in collaboration with regional governments and development partners, has been working to strengthen efforts to balance the many potential trade-offs associated with bioenergy production. This publication is a compilation of papers presented at the FAO symposium on "Sustainable bioenergy in Asia: improving resilience to high food prices and climate change" held in Bangkok, Thailand from 1 to 2 June 2011. It highlights a number of important policy issues associated with bioenergy developments in the region as well as practical approaches to address potential trade-offs. In doing so it offers valuable insights on how to ensure that bioenergy development in Asia enhances food security, benefits rural development and contributes to reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Book (series)

Sustainable bioenergy potential in Zambia
An integrated bioenergy food security assessment
2020

Also available in:

No results found.

Zambia is richly endowed with a wide range of biomass sources including woodlands, forests, agricultural residues and livestock waste. Biomass energy contributes supplies over 70 percent of the country’s energy needs. Due to the current extraction and consumption methods, the use of biomass energy has been linked with detrimental environmental effects such as deforestation and forest degradation as well as climate change, due to the loss of carbon sinks. Inefficient utilisation of biomass contributes significantly to deforestation which is estimated at between 79 000 – 150 000 ha per year, and negatively affects the health and income of rural households that depend on forest products for their livelihoods. Sustainable bioenergy strategies and alternative bioenergy solutions need to be defined and integrated into current efforts of the country to increase stable and sustainable access to energy. This report assesses the country context and defines which bioenergy options can be viable considering a number of solutions for electricity production, cooking fuels and transport fuels at the provincial and district level. Possible options originating from crop residues, livestock residues and forest plantation harvesting residues are identified, having netted out agriculture and forestry needs. The assessment now needs to be followed by local verification and investment to deploy an initial set of bioenergy projects and test the findings on the ground.
Document

A Compilation of Tools and Methodologies to Assess the Sustainability of Modern Bioenergy 2012

Also available in:

No results found.

The FAO?s Bioenergy and Food Security Criteria and Indicators (BEFSCI) project has compiled a set of thirty relevant and methodologies that can be used assess, during both planning and monitoring,the main environmental and socioeconomic impacts of bioenergy. The results can development of a sustainable bioenergy sustainable operations. Modern bioenergy development, through its environmental and socio-economic impacts, may have positive or negative effects (both direct and indirect) on the four dimensions of food security: availability, access, utilization and stability. For instance, bioenergy may create new employment and incomegenerating opportunities, with positive effects on people?s access to food. At the same time, if good practices are not implemented,bioenergy production may lead to negative impacts, for example,on the productive capacity of land or on water availability and quality, with negative repercussions for food security.
Book (stand-alone)

The Global Bioenergy Partnership Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy
Executive summary
2011

Also available in:

No results found.

In June 2008, the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) established the GBEP Task Force on Sustainability to promote sustainable production and use of bioenergy. The Task Force, under the leadership of the United Kingdom until October 2010 and of Sweden after that, has developed a relevant, practical, science-based set of measurements and indicators that can inform policy-makers and other stakeholders in countries seeking to develop their bioenergy sector to help meet national goals of s ustainable development.