COPESCAL TECHNICAL PAPER   10

Cover
A strategic assessment of the potential for freshwater fish farming in Latin America
CONTENTS


by
James McDaid Kapetsky
Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service
FAO Fisheries Department
and
Shree S. Nath
PD/A CRSP, Department of Bioresource Engineering
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon, USA


The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.


M-44
ISBN 92-5-103989-5


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.

PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT

This is the second study that evaluates inland fish farming potential on a continental basis. The overall purpose is to stimulate aquaculture development.

Preliminary work began on this study in late 1994 and early 1995. It resumed again in late 1995, and the final geographical information systems (GIS) analyses were completed in July 1996.

Compared with the earlier study, made for Africa, the present one is considerably more sophisticated. Perhaps the most significant advance is the integration of a growth model into the GIS to predict fish yields over the entire continent. The integration came into being through a coincidence of interests. On the part of FAO, it was the need to do a better job of predicting yield potential and on the part of the Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program (PD/A CRSP) it was an opportunity to provide a geographic basis for an existing growth model and to extend it to additional species. The cooperation between the two organizations and individuals has been largely informal. Two modest contracts saw the work completed. The elapsed time for the integration, including the time from first discussions, to the stage of a second round of outputs that are reported herein, was about one year. It required one meeting between the authors to organize the work, in September 1995, and a three-week working session in Rome in November 1995, to put the integration on a firm footing. For the remainder, communication was almost daily, by E-mail, of which there are nearly 300 messages logged.

Distribution:

FAO Regional and Sub-Regional Fishery and Aquaculture Officers
COPESCAL Mailing List
FAO Fisheries Department

Kapetsky, J.M.; Nath, S.S.
A strategic assessment of the potential for freshwater fish farming in Latin America.
COPESCAL Technical Paper. No. 10. Rome, FAO. 1997. 128p.
ABSTRACT
Marine and many inland fishery resources are heavily exploited or overexploited, and although there is potential for increasing production from inland fisheries through intensification, development of aquaculture holds the most promise in the long term for improving food security through increasing the supply of fish. Currently, inland aquaculture production in Latin America is insignificant compared with the output from inland and marine fisheries.
Lack of good planning at national level has been identified as a serious impediment to the development of aquaculture. Estimates of potential are scarce that are both comprehensive and comparable over large geographic areas. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to estimate the potential for warm-water and temperate-water fish farming in the fresh waters of Latin America in order to stimulate improved planning for aquaculture development at national levels, and at the same time to provide a tool to plan comprehensively for technical assistance activities by FAO and other national and international organizations.
The present study is patterned on an estimate of warm-water fish farming potential made for Africa. However, a number of refinements have been made, one of which is a fourfold increase in resolution (i.e., to 5 arc-minutes, equivalent to 9 km x 9 km grids at the equator), thereby making the results much more usable for assessing fish farming potential at the national level. Another refinement is that, for the first time, a bio-energetics model has been incorporated into a geographical information system (GIS) to predict fish yields over large geographic areas. A gridded water temperature data set was used as input to the bioenergetics model to predict numbers of crops per year for four species: Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum), pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) and carp (Cyprinus carpio). By varying input levels and sizes at harvest, opportunities for two levels of commercial fish farming and for small-scale fish farming were identified.
In addition to the suitability of each 9 x 9 km grid cell for the production of the above-mentioned species, each grid cell was evaluated for a number of other factors important for fish-farm development and operation. These included urban market potential based on travel time proximity and population size of urban centres, potential for farm-gate sales based on population density, engineering and terrain suitability for pond construction using a variety of soil attributes, water loss from ponds due to evaporation and seepage, and availability of agricultural by-products as feed inputs based on crop potential. Commercial and small-scale aquaculture models were developed by weighting these factors using a multiple criteria evaluation procedure. Areas unavailable for inland fish farming development were identified by incorporating protected areas and large inland water bodies as constraints.
Finally, the yield potential of each grid cell for each of the four species was analysed using the growth model together with the other factors in the commercial and small-scale models to show the coincidence of each class of suitability with each range of yield potential.
Potential for inland fish farming is high in continental Latin America. From 8% to 60% of the continental area scores from suitable to very suitable for small-scale farming of Nile tilapia and carp, respectively. In the same areas, from 0.9 to 1.7 crops/y of Nile tilapia and from 0.9 to 1.8 crops/y of carp can be realized by harvesting at modest weights.
The most important factor for commercial fish farming - urban market potential - scores high across more than one-half of the continent. For Nile tilapia and carp, from 19% to 44% of Latin America rates from suitable to very suitable for commercial farming. From 1.2 to 2.4 crops/y of Nile tilapia and from 1.2 to 2.3 crops/y of carp can be realized on the same areas by feeding at 75% satiation and harvesting at a moderate weight. Tambaqui and pacu occupy an intermediate position in terms of the surface area that is suitable or very suitable for commercial farming. From 0.7 to 1.4 crops/y for tambaqui and from 1.0 to 2.0 crops/y for pacu can be achieved from areas that are suitable or very suitable for commercial farming by feeding at 75% satiation and harvesting at a moderate weight.
From a country viewpoint, at least 18 of the continental countries have some area with potential that rates suitable or very suitable for farming of Nile tilapia and pacu, while there are 19 in the same category for tambaqui. Finally, there are opportunities for carp farming in all 21 countries.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

ROME © FAO 1997


Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.

This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.


CONTENTS

1.   Introduction

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVES

STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS OF AQUACULTURE POTENTIAL

INLAND AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION IN LATIN AMERICA

SMALL-SCALE AND COMMERCIAL AQUACULTURE IN INLAND LATIN AMERICA

2.   Methods

METHODOLOGICAL OVERVIEW

GIS PROCEDURES

FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF FISH FARMS

Urban market size and proximity

Time proximity

Market size

Time proximity and market size combined

Farm-gate sales

Soil and terrain suitability for freshwater fish ponds

Analytical approach

Water Loss

Evaporation

Air temperature

Seepage

Water loss estimates

Agricultural by-products as feed and fertilizer inputs

Crop potential

Thresholds for inputs

MODELS OF SMALL-SCALE AND COMMERCIAL FISH FARMING

Factors for small-scale and commercial fish farming development and operation

Weighting procedure

Procedure for building the commercial model

Combination of factors for the commercial model

Procedure to build the small-scale aquaculture model

FISH FARMING YIELD POTENTIAL OF FOUR SPECIES

Water temperature modelling

Fish growth modelling

Commercial farming

Small-scale farming

COMBINATION OF ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL FROM COMMERCIAL AND SMALL-SCALE MODELS WITH THE SPECIES YIELD MODEL

CONSTRAINTS

VERIFICATION

3.   Results

CONTINENTAL OVERVIEW OF FACTORS FOR FISH FARMING DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION

CONTINENTAL OVERVIEW OF COMMERCIAL AND SMALL-SCALE FARMING MODELS

COUNTRY-LEVEL VIEWS OF FACTORS

Urban market potential

Potential for farm-gate sales

Soil suitability for ponds

Potential agricultural by-products

Water loss

COUNTRY-LEVEL VIEWS OF COMMERCIAL AND SMALL-SCALE MODELS

Commercial farming

Small-scale farming

FISH YIELDS

Continental view

Country-level views of yield potential by species: commercial farming

Tambaqui

Pacu

Nile tilapia

Carp

Country-level views of yield potential by species: small-scale farming

POTENTIAL WITH SPECIES YIELD AND COMMERCIAL AND SMALL-SCALE MODELS COMBINED

Continental view - commercial farming

Continental view - small-scale farming

Country-level view - commercial farming

Country-level view - small-scale farming

VERIFICATION

4.   Discussion

POTENTIAL FOR INLAND FISH FARMING IN LATIN AMERICA

INTERPRETATION OF FACTORS AND MODEL RESULTS

Surrogate factors

Thresholds and scoring

Nominal area estimates and actual potential

Interpretation of yield potential for species

Tambaqui and pacu

Improvements

Verification

CONCLUSIONS

Factors affecting development and operation of fish farms

Yield potential of species

Overall potential

Verification

Future applications

Potential of inland fisheries

5.   Acknowledgements

6.   References

Annex 1   -  GIS Analyses For The Assessment Of Fish Farming Potential In Latin America (by F. Grita)

1.   OVERVIEW

1.1   Inputs

1.2   The database

1.3   Outputs

2.   DATABASE LAYERS

2.1   Protected areas

2.2   Water bodies

2.3   Mean monthly air temperature

2.4   Mean monthly rainfall

2.5   Roads

2.6   Population density

2.7   Water temperature

2.8   Soil and terrain suitability for ponds

2.9   Potential for agricultural by-products

2.10   Solar radiation

2.11   Urban market potential and proximity

2.12   Farm-gate sales

2.13   Fish yield model

2.14   Water balance

3.   THE COMMERCIAL AND SMALL-SCALE MODELS

4.   STATISTICS

4.1   Yield statistics of fish species

4.2   Statistics of the input parameters and models

4.3   Statistics of the results of the models

5.   FILE NAMES

5.1   Models and statistics

5.2   Yield of fish species

6.   BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDIX A1   - CONVERSION OF IDA TO GRID

APPENDIX A2   - MEAN MONTHLY WATER TEMPERATURE PROCEDURE

APPENDIX A3   - PROCEDURE FOR URBAN MARKET SIZE AND PROXIMITY

Annex 2  -  Water Temperature Model

MODEL STRUCTURE

Short-wave solar radiation

Net long-wave atmospheric radiation

Water surface radiation

Evaporative heat loss

Conductive heat loss or gain

Annex 3  -  Fish Growth Model

MODEL STRUCTURE

Effects of size

Effects of food availability

Effects of environmental variables

MODEL CALIBRATION

Nile tilapia

Tambaqui

Pacu

Common carp

MODEL VALIDATION

Nile tilapia

Tambaqui

Pacu

Common carp