Field Report F–15 Prepared by J.E. Reynolds FISHCODE/MANAGEMENT - GCP/INT/648/NOR FAO/NORWAY GOVERNMENT FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS |
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. |
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing Management Service, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to copyright@fao.org
This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software and careful manual recorrection. Even if the quality of digitalisation is high, the FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.
|
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION
THE LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH PROJECT (LTR)
REGIONAL FRAMEWORK FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN (FFMP)
TANGANYIKA REGIONAL FISHERIES PROGRAMME (TREFIP)
3. THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
A. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
B. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
C. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
4. PROGRAMME ALTERNATIVES
5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSA. ‘NO PROGRAMME’ (‘DO NOTHING’) OPTION
B. ‘WITH PROGRAMME’ OPTION
A. ECOLOGY AND FISH
B. FORESTRY AND LAND USE
C. HYDROLOGY, WATER QUALITY, AND SOILS
D. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS
E. COMMUNITIES
6. MITIGATION MEASURES
A. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 1: IMPLEMENTATION OF CO-MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS
B. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 2: IMPROVED INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES
C. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 3: PROTECTION OF STOCKS AND BIODIVERSITY
D. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 4: IMPROVED FISHERIES LEGAL REGIMES AND MCS CAPABILITIES
E. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 5: MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF SCIENTIFIC ADVICE FOR MANAGEMENT
F. IMPACT MITIGATION FOR OUTPUT 6: ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ENTITY
7. MONITORING
A. MONITORING THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
B. MONITORING THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
C. MONITORING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION
COMMUNITY HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
SOCIO-ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT
ANNEX 1. LAKEWIDE SUMMARY OF LTR 1997 SEC SURVEY FINDINGS
ANNEX 2. REFERENCES CITED/CONSULTED