Work Plan Implementation | SCS/82/WP/102 |
(Working Paper) |
FISHPEN AND CAGE CULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN LAGUNA DE BAY REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES |
NOTICE OF COPYRIGHT
The copyright in this publication is vested in the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, by any method or process, without written permission from the copyright holder. Applications for such permission with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction desired, should be made through and addressed to the Programme Leader, South China Sea Fisheries Development and Coordinating Programme, P.O. Box 1184 M.C.C. Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Fishpen and Cage Culture Development Project
in Laguna de Bay, Philippines
A report to the
Field Level Workshops for the Fishpen/Cage
Development in Laguna de Bay
TCP/PHI/0003(T)
by
Catalino R. Dela Cruz
Senior Aquaculture Officer (Team Leader)
Project Document Identification
III. Work Plan 4(a)(ii), (b)(iii), (c)(ii) & (iv)
4. Aquaculture The objective will be to establish a programme of action for aquaculture development through the improvement of cultural practices in existing areas in particular countries, and the development of new areas.
Determination of the particular systems most likely to be profitable in each country.
Examine legal and institutional machinery related to aquaculture, in particular the aspects which hinder development of aquaculture.
Determination of extent and nature of areas suitable for future expansion of aquaculture.
Describe ecological characteristics of the areas where expansion seems possible, e.g., vegetation, salinity, water quality, water currents, etc.
Describe existing or potential competition for use of potential areas (pollution, competition from housing and industries, other demands).
Examination of factors affecting productivity and profitability of existing and future aquaculture operations.
Examine cost and benefits of different sizes of farms, with special reference to supplies and uses of materials and labour.
Examine markets and marketing practices.
FISHPEN AND CAGE CULTURE DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT IN LAGUNA DE BAY, PHILIPPINES
by
CATALINO R. DELA CRUZ1
This report covers the aquaculture sub-component aspect of the Project TCP/PHI/0003(5) which is an FAO/TCP technical assistance to LLDA in order to further strengthen its capacity to implement effectively the bank-financed Laguna de Bay Fishpen Development Project (LBFDP).
Review of existing information and field level workshops were conducted. Among other things, the technologies on milkfish pen culture and tilapia cage culture were discussed with the fishermen during the workshops. The pen and cage culture systems as gathered from technical publications, personal interviews from the LLDA consultants and fishermen themselves are discussed thoroughly in this report. It also includes a proposed pure cage culture of tilapia along with other recommendations to LLDA.
SOUTH CHINA SEA FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATING PROGRAMME
Manila, Philippines
June 1982
Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.
This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.
1.1 Project Background (LBFDP)
1.2 Background of the TCP/PHI/0003 (T)
3.1 Fishpen Designs and Culture Practices
3.1.1.3 Structural framework, construction materials and specifications
3.1.1.4 Time and sequence of construction
3.1.1.5 Some required skills in construction
3.1.2.2 Source and transport of fingerlings
3.1.2.3 Culture/Management practices
3.1.3 Problems in fishpen operation
3.2 Cage Designs and Culture Practices
3.2.1.2 Materials of construction
3.2.2.2 Tilapia seed production
3.2.2.3 Stocking density and production
3.2.2.4 Harvesting and marketing
3.2.3 Problems on cage culture
3.3 Fishpen and Cage Culture System for the LBFDP as Proposed by the BRI Consultants
3.4 Production and Profitability of Fishpen and Cages
APPENDICES
1. Pagggawa ng “Fishpen” (Fishpen Construction)
2. Pamamaraan sa Pag-aalaga ng Bangus sa “Fishpen” (Pen Culture of Milkfish)
3. Pag-aalaga ng Tilapia sa “Cage” (Kulungan) (Cage Culture of Tilapia)
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Combined profitability of fishpen and cage culture
2. Profitability of pure cage culture of Tilapia nilotica (no supplemental feeding)
3. Annual production and sale per size of module
4. Income statement per module size
5. Basic assumptions for pure cage culture of tilapia nilotica
6. Gross income, expenses and net income (no feed supplement)
7. Gross income, expenses and net income (with feed supplement)
8. Capital investments in pure cage culture
9. Tilapia production in pure cage culture
10. Amount and use of loan in pure cage culture
11. Loan amortization schedule (without feeds)
12. Loan amortization schedule (with feeds)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Cluster arrangement of pens and cages with common barrier
2. Isometric view of common barrier and net enclosure
3. Side view of common barrier and net enclosure