ALCOM Report No. 23
FAO LIBRARY AN:382633
ALCOM | GCP/INT/555/SWE |
Aquaculture for Local Community Development Programme | GCP/RAF/277/BEL |
RESERVOIR FISHERY IN EASTERN PROVINCE OF ZAMBIA by Henk W. van der Mheen Aquaculturist and Jennie van der Mheen-Sluijer Socio-economist |
Funding Agencies:
SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BELGIAN ADMINISTRATION FOR DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION
Executing Agency.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Harare, Zimbabwe, January 1997
PREFACE
This document reports on the activities carried out under the ALCOM pilot project “Development of Small Reservoir Fisheries in Eastern province of Zambia” between December 1989 and May 1992.
The pilot project aimed at demonstrating productive small reservoir fishery management strategies which are within the capacity of national and local Government entities to plan and promote, and which are acceptable to and benefit the local communities.
The experiences of the pilot project will be useful in the SADC (Southern Africa Development Community) region, and elsewhere, for planning and implementing activities to improve the management of reservoir fisheries.
ALCOM is a regional aquatic resource management programme executed by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). The main office of the programme is in Harare, Zimbabwe, and the programme implements pilot project in the SADC region.
ALCOM's aim is to assist member countries improve the living standards of rural populations though the practice of appropriate aquatic resource management techniques. Towards this end, pilot activities are conducted in selected countries to demonstrate new techniques, technologies and methodologies. Successes achieved, ideas derived, and lessons learned are disseminated for use in the region and elsewhere. ALCOM began its work in 1986 and is funded by Sweden and Belgium, with contributions from member countries.
ALCOM Address:
Mail: | P O. Box 3730, Harare, Zimbabwe |
Phone: | +263 4 724985/734797 |
Fax: | +263 4 736847 |
Telex: | 26040 FAO ZW |
Email: | ALCOM @harare.iafrica.com |
Homepage: | http://www.zamnet.com/zamnet/alcom/alcom.htm |
The presentation of material in this publication is that of the Programme and does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.
This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.
3.1. Reservoirs in Eastern Province
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF RESERVOIR FISHERY
4.4. Fishing grounds and Seasonality of Fishing gears
4.7. Summary of characteristics
5.1. Access to Fishing Grounds
6. FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF FISHING METHODS
6.5. Sensitivity Analysis on Incomes
7. STANDARD OF LIVING OF FISHERS COMPARED TO NON-FISHERS
9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX 1: METHODOLOGY SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL INCOME DIFFERENT TYPES OF GEAR
APPENDIX 3: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON INCOMES
APPENDIX 4: CATCH MONITORING SURVEY
List of tables
Table 1: Number of reservoirs by constructing agency
Table 2: Number of reservoirs by period of construction
Table 3: Size distribution of reservoirs
Table 4: Characteristics of studied reservoirs
Table 5: Presence of different fish species per dam as found by the drottningholm method
Table 6: Breakdown of number of fishers using certain type of gear per reservoir
Table 7: Characteristics different types of fishery
Table 8: Reasons for using certain type of gear (% of respondents)
Table 9: Reasons to fish (% of respondents)
Table 10: Fishers aspiration to have more fish (% of respondents)
Table 11: Features of different fishing units (as determined by the socio-economic study)
Table 12: Annual incomes by type of gear (zk) for makungwa dam
Table 13: Annual incomes by type of gear (zk) for kangombe dam
Table 14: Annual incomes by type of gear (zk) for chadewa dam
Table 15: Demographic characteristics of the different household categories (h.h .= Household)
Table 16: Primary sources of income (% of respondents)
Table 17: Percentage of households owning certain items
Table 18: Average number of months per year households lack animal protein and nshima
Table 19: Consumption of meat, fish and eggs for the different household categories (in number of times per month)
Table 20: Annual income net fishery (zk)
Table 21: Annual income trap fishery (zk)
Table 22: Annual income hook and line fishery (zk)
Table 23: Annual income fishery with other gear (zk)
Table 24: Sensitivity analysis net fishery (zk)
Table 25: Sensitivity analysis trap fishery (zk)
Table 26: Sensitivity analysis hook and line fishery (zk)
Table 27: Sensitivity analysis fishery with other gear (zk)
Table 28: Number of records collected during creel survey per day, dam and gear
Table 29: Fishing effort, catch per hour and estimated total catch per dam and gear
Table 30: Species composition in percentage in number and weight per dam and per gear
List of figures
Figure 1: Distribution of reservoirs in eastern province of zambia
Figure 2: Average species composition of the sampled reservoirs (in percentage of total weight)
Figure 3: Species composition of catches per gear, using different data collection methods (h & 1 = hook and line)
Figure 4: Seasonality of fishing gear in different dams, as determined by two data collection methods
Figure 5: Relative fishing effort for three reservoirs, during the rainy season and dry season, data from socio-economic study
Figure 6: Relative fishing effort for two reservoirs, during the rainy season and dry season, data from catch monitoring survey
Figure 7: Disposal of catch, percentage of the catch sold, bartered, distributed (or given away), and used for home consumption
Figure 8: Sales point for fish
Figure 9: Percentage of respondents reporting lack of nshima during certain months of the year, by gear.
Figure 10: Percentage of respondents reporting lack of animal protein during certain months of the gear, by year