FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1026 |
FIMF/C1026 (En) |
|||
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE PROJECT |
||||
| ||||
Download ZIP version 951 kb |
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information
product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part
of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the
legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities,
or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific
companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does
not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to
others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. |
ISBN 978-92-5-105824-4
ISSN 0429-9329
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Communication Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected]
© FAO 2007
Cochrane, K.L.; Augustyn, C.J.; Bianchi, G.; de Barros, P.; Fairweather, T.; Iitembu, J.; Japp, D.; Kanandjembo, A.; Kilongo, K.; Moroff, N.; Nel, D.; Roux, J.-P.; Shannon, L.J.; van Zyl, B.; Vaz Velho, F. Results and conclusions of the project "Ecosystem approaches for fisheries management in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem". FAO Fisheries Circular. No. 1026. Rome, FAO. 2007. 167pp. Abstract This report provides the final results and conclusions of the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem (BCLME) project LMR/EAF/03/01 “Ecosystem approaches for fisheries management in the BCLME”. The project set out to examine the feasibility of implementing an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF) in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem which extends from east of Port Elizabeth, South Africa, to Angola's Cabinda province in the north. The project, a cooperative effort by BCLME, the management agencies of the three countries and FAO, started in January 2004 and ended in December 2006. The main objective of the project has been to investigate the feasibility of EAF management in the BCLME region through examining the existing issues, problems and needs related to EAF, and considering different management options to achieve sustainable management of the resources at an ecosystem level. The approach followed was to focus on ten of the major fisheries in the three countries. The project used a structured and participatory approach, attempting to engage the range of stakeholders in the countries, in order to identify and prioritize the gaps in the existing, largely conventional, approaches to fisheries management and to describe potential management actions necessary to address those gaps. In a similarly participatory approach, preliminary estimates of the costs and benefits (positive and negative impacts) of those actions specifically related to implementation of EAF have been made. The costs and benefits were evaluated for each of the broad objectives identified for each fishery. The detailed results, including potential management actions and their costs and benefits, are still preliminary but the issues and the broad management needs and possible actions that have been identified are highly informative. The process that has been developed provides a valuable framework for future refinement and implementation of EAF. The project also considered the applicability of a number of tools and activities that would be important for effective progress in implementation of EAF, in particular methods for improved decisionmaking, incentives to encourage implementation, institutional requirements and research needs. |
1.1 Terms of reference of the BCLME project on EAF2. THE FISHERIES INCLUDED IN THE STUDY
2.1 Reviews of current fisheries management approaches3. NATIONAL EAF ISSUES AND PRIORITIES
2.2 Fisheries included in the study
3.1 Angola4. REGIONAL ISSUES AND PRIORITIES
3.2 Namibia hake fishery
3.3 Namibia purse seine fishery
3.4 Namibia midwater trawl fishery
3.5 South Africa demersal hake fishery
3.6 South Africa small pelagics fishery
3.7 South Africa West Coast rock lobster fishery
4.1 Overview of the Benguela Current Commission Interim Agreement5. EVALUATING OPTIONS FOR EAF MANAGEMENT ACTION
4.2 Issues raised at the Third Regional Workshop
5.1 Angola6. RESULTS FROM APPLICATION OF SIMULATION MODELS
5.2 Namibia
5.3 South Africa
5.4 Conclusions
6.1 South Africa7. INDICATORS FOR EAF
6.2 Angola
6.3 Namibia
6.4 Comments from the Third Regional Workshop
7.1 Introduction8. COMPARATIVE APPLICATION OF INDICATORS TO CHARACTERIZE
7.2 Conclusions and recommendations of the Third Regional Workshop
8.1 Overview of existing knowledge on ecosystem states,9. OPTIONS FOR IMPROVED TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES
changes and functioning in the BCLME
8.2 Discussion and conclusions of the Third Regional Workshop
9.1 Introduction10. POTENTIAL INCENTIVES FOR FACILITATING EAF
9.2 Multicriteria support for decision-making in the ecosystems
approach to fisheries management
9.3 An application of fuzzy logic to facilitate decision-making
9.4 Conclusions of the Third Regional Workshop
10.1 Introduction11. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCCESSFUL
10.2 Conclusions of the Third Regional Workshop
11.1 Angola12. RESEARCH NEEDS
11.2 Namibia
11.3 South Africa
11.4 Discussion and conclusions of the Third Regional Workshop
12.1 Angola13. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
12.2 Namibia
12.3 South Africa
12.4 Conclusions on research needs from the Third Regional Workshop
13.1 IntroductionREFERENCES
13.2 The issues and priorities
13.3 Options for EAF management action
13.4 Potential use of simulation models
13.5 Indicators for EAF
13.6 Options for strengthening the decision-making process
13.7 Potential incentives for facilitating EAF
13.8 Institutional arrangements for implementation of EAF
13.9 Research needs