Evaluation of FAO's work in Somalia 2018–2022

FAO

Evaluation of FAO's work in Somalia 2018–2022

Highlights

Year of publication 2025

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 1 p.

Author FAO

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) This evaluation covered FAO’s work in Somalia from 2018–2022. Its purpose was formative, to provide feedback to improve future programming, making FAO’s work more effective and relevant to the needs of the country. The evaluation relied primarily on qualitative methods, triangulated with available quantitative evidence. It adopted a consultative approach, engaging stakeholders throughout the process to validate findings and promote its utility.

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Booklet

Impact evaluation of FAO’s cash-for-work programme in Somalia
Findings from the baseline survey
2024

Also available in:

No results found.

This report presents the results from the analysis of baseline data collected for the evaluation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s cash-for-work programme in Somalia. This programme provides temporary employment opportunities in the maintenance or rehabilitation of public infrastructure. Its primary objective is to offer income support to vulnerable individuals while facilitating the development of essential community assets. To evaluate the impact of the programme, we use a longitudinal, quasi-experimental design study, with one baseline and three follow-up surveys at 12, 24 and 36 months. The evaluation focuses on 14 districts in Somalia, Somaliland and Puntland. Within each district, we selected four treatment villages and four comparison villages. The baseline data collection took place in January/February 2023. We calculate five main programme outcomes as summary indexes: resilience, food security, income and livelihoods, agency, social cohesion. For all of them, we do not detect any statistically significant differences between the two evaluation arms. There are small imbalances between the treatment and comparison groups on three characteristics. The treatment arm reports a larger number of income sources, a larger number of months with members participating in wage labour and greater participation in social networks than the comparison group. These results were expected, since the baseline survey took place around three weeks after the public works activities started, though payments were not made. The analysis of sociodemographic characteristics points to a relatively successful targeting approach. We observe a relatively large share of people of working age and a minor share of elderly people. Households lacking adult members are only 1 percent of the sample. Further, one out of ten households report having a member with a moderate or severe disability.
Booklet

Evaluation of FAO’s Country Portfolio in Somalia
2018–2022
2025

Also available in:

No results found.

This evaluation assesses the strategic relevance and contribution of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Somalia from 2018 to 2022, providing insights and recommendations to improve programming. As one of FAO’s largest and longest-running country programmes, this assessment is particularly important given the last country programme evaluation was conducted in 2012.The evaluation makes eight key recommendations including that FAO Somalia develop strategic business cases to translate its priorities into actionable programme areas that address crises' root causes. It also recommends reprioritizing natural resource management with a comprehensive vision to address core challenges in Somalia, updating FAO Somalia’s structure to enhance cohesion across main and sub-offices and initiating corporate-level discussions to find robust ways to maintain the critical mass needed for operations in Somalia to alleviate operational strains.
Book (series)

Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to Cabo Verde 2018–2022 2023

Also available in:

No results found.

This evaluation reviews the FAO country programme in Cabo Verde over the 2018–2022 timeframe. FAO remains a reference institution for rural development and the country's maritime economy, particularly appreciated for its inclusive approach and outreach. FAO’s technical role is jeopardized by the limited critical mass of technical experts available in the country. FAO has significantly assisted the country in institutional strengthening (Right to Adequate Food law, SDG indicator 2.1.2, food security) however, critical issues remain regarding food and nutrition security (FNS) governance. FAO played a crucial role in the design and initial implementation of the overall strategic, programmatic and institutional framework of the blue economy. There are, nonetheless, concerns regarding the institutional uptake and consolidation by national partners of the obtained results. A more incisive contribution to the sector of small/artisanal fishery and a comprehensive capacity development programme is needed to address the blue economy challenges.