Evaluation of NEPAD-FAO Fish Programme, GCP/RAF/463/MUL - Final report

Evaluation of NEPAD-FAO Fish Programme, GCP/RAF/463/MUL - Final report

Year of publication 2014

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 87 p.

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Document

Series title Project Evaluation Series

Edition 1

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) The NFFP was developed through a process of broad consultation with African stakeholders, both before the start of the Programme and during the Inception year (2011). Many issues were raised as characterising the developmental context. Principle among them was weak governance and policies, insufficient capacity to implement responsible fisheries and aquaculture practices, and the significant vulnerability of fishing communities to disasters and climate change.

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Document

Evaluation of NEPAD-FAO Fish Programme, GCP/RAF/463/MUL - Management response to the mid-term evaluation report 2014

Also available in:

No results found.

Management response to the mid-term evaluation report
Document

Final evaluation of Capacity building for South African Professionals in the Field of Agriculture and Food Security (GCP/RAF/412/SAF). 2016

Also available in:

No results found.
Book (series)

Final evaluation of the project “Securing tenure rights for forest landscape-dependent communities: linking science with policy to advance tenure security, sustainable forest management and people’s livelihoods”. Main report
GCP/GLO/806/GFF GEF ID: 5797
2019

Also available in:

No results found.

Peru is among the world’s ten mega-diverse countries, Indonesia’s rainforests shelter almost 20 percent of the world’s plant, mammal and bird species, while Uganda forests are home to about 7.5 percent of mammal and 10.2 percent of global bird species, and support the world’s highest number of primate species. Unclear tenure and conflicts are the major factors in deforestation of forest areas targeted by the project implemented by FAO, aimed at securing tenure rights for forest landscape-dependent communities: linking science with policy to advance tenure security, sustainable forest Management and people’s livelihoods. Which results achieved the project, and what are the lessons that can be replicated? To what extent were government institutions and indigenous communities empowered by the project to develop and implement policies and projects that support tenure security, livelihoods and sustainable forest management? These are just some of the questions answered in this evaluation.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.