Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
Book (stand-alone)Report of the Inception Workshop: Sustainable Management of Tuna Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation in the ABNJ, Rome, Italy, 10–12 March 2014 2014
Also available in:
No results found.FAO. 2014. Report of the Inception Workshop: Sustainable Management of Tuna Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation in the ABNJ, Rome, Italy, 10–12 March 2014. Rome. 35 pp. -
Poster, bannerPoster on the EAFM symposium on the application of the ecosystem approach to fisheries in the areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) 2024
Also available in:
No results found.Poster to promote the Symposium, focussing on the application of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) in the areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) in the northern and southern hemispheres managed by Regional FIsheries Management Organisations (RFMOs), RFMOs have existing measures to protect vulnerable species and habitats, but find it challenging to integrate this with other aspects of EAFM particular at the harvested fish stock and ecosystem levels. -
Book (stand-alone)A review of the application of the FAO ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF) management within the areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) 2020
Also available in:
No results found.The publication documents the results of the review of the level of implementation of the FAO Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF) by the fisheries management bodies in each of the different ABNJ regions. The review was designed to help identify future activities by the ABNJ Deep Sea Project to address gaps and capacity development and make recommendations to strengthen EAF among deep-sea fisheries management bodies and/or their members. The information to complete the EAF reviews was largely obtained from web-based materials. To assist with the accuracy of these desktop assessments, following initial drafting of each EAF background report and associated EAF assessment, both documents were sent to the respective RFMO secretariats. Comments and/or suggestions provided by the secretariats were then addressed with revised versions of the background reports and review assessments generated. Based on these revised reports, the comparative analyses were finalized and a full report was drafted. Being a desk-top assessment of the level of implementation of the EAF approach by each of the RFMO management bodies, the study had a number of caveats including only being able to measure systems and processes, not outcomes. A more complete assessment of EAF adoption and especially the outcomes would require direct involvement of the various stakeholders, including all relevant management, compliance and scientific bodies, contracting parties (CP), non-contracting parties (NCP), vessel owners, crews, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), etc.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.