Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentEvaluation reportEvaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Guyana. Management response
sep/16
2016Also available in:
No results found.The evaluation which covered FAO’s cooperation in Guyana from 2012 to 2015 was very timely. The evaluation although in a limited way (due to the late submission of the report), provided very useful inputs which helped to orient the new CPF 2016-2019, making the CPF more aligned and relevant to the Government and other stakeholder priorities. Moreover, the discussions conducted during the evaluation emphasized the need to promote ownership of the CPF development process, and the involvement of na tional partners (government entities, civil society organization and the private sector). -
DocumentEvaluation reportEvaluation of FAO’s contribution in Trinidad and Tobago 2016
Also available in:
No results found.In 2010, the Office of Evaluation (OED) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) began to independently assess the impact of various FAO programmes within member countries. OED reports directly to the Director General, as well as the FAO Council through the Programme Committee. In November 2014, the Programme Committee endorsed the selection of a group of Caribbean countries and Guyana for evaluation in 2015, including Trinidad and Tobago. The basis of the evaluation is the Country Programme Framework (CPF) which describes the scope of the assistance that FAO provides to a country. The Trinidad and Tobago evaluation covered the period of 2010-2015. The evaluation reviewed the work of FAO in Trinidad and Tobago, including its investments, technical assistance and collaboration with national and regional partners. The main aim of the evaluation is to inform the development of the new CPF cycle (beginning in mid-2015) for Trinidad and Tobago, as well as each of the targeted countries. The evaluation’s findings and recommendations will help to better orient FAO’s programme in the next programme cycle, and to make it more relevant to the priorities of the concerned governments. The evaluation also assessed the strategic relevance of FAO’s programmes in the national context, and of the initiatives implemented within the country. Furthermore, in the context of aid effectiveness, and of the international community’s concern over a country’s ownership of th e development process, the evaluation aimed to emphasize the involvement of national partners in the evaluation process. In particular, it is anticipated that the concerned governments will ensure the appropriation of the evaluation results by the relevant national institutions, and promote their use at the national level. -
DocumentEvaluation reportEvaluation of FAO's Contribution in Crisis-Related Transition – Linking Relief to Development. Final Report 2014
Also available in:
No results found.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
-
Book (series)Evaluation reportÉvaluation finale du projet «Élimination des polluants organiques persistants et pesticides obsolètes et renforcement de la gestion du cycle de vie des pesticides au Bénin»
Code de projet: GCP/BEN/056/GFF - Identifiant FEM: 4756
2021Also available in:
Ce rapport présente les résultats de l’évaluation finale du projet «Élimination des polluants organiques persistants et pesticides obsolètes et renforcement de la gestion du cycle de vie des pesticides au Bénin» (projet GCP/BEN/056/GFF), exécuté par la FAO et le Gouvernement du Bénin de mars 2015 à septembre 2021. Le projet est cohérent pas rapport aux priorités du pays et des partenaires. Le projet a su mobiliser l’approche champs-écoles des producteurs (CEP), la gestion intégrée de la production et des déprédateurs (GIPD) et des partenariats pertinents. Des lacunes au niveau du processus de gestion du cycle de vie des pesticides ont néanmoins été identifiées et des mesures correctives proposées. Le cadre réglementaire a été renforcé ainsi que les capacités nationales en décontamination des sites polluées, sécurisation des pesticides obsolètes et polluants organiques persistants (POP), analyse des échantillons de sol pollués, recyclage et gestion des emballages vides de pesticides, test et d’adoption de techniques et systèmes alternatifs basés sur la GIPD, etc. -
Book (series)Evaluation reportEvaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Republic of Indonesia 2016–2020 2021
Also available in:
No results found.There are numerous risks to the sustainability and stability of Indonesia’s farming system, food production system, supply chains, and ecosystems. The evaluation aims to answer two essential questions: whether FAO is doing what is needed and whether it is making a difference.This evaluation recommends that FAO support the green and blue (land and sea) preparedness and adaptation plans, as well as early warning systems. The evaluation further recommends that FAO ramp up its support for a national decision support system that adopts a food systems approach to provide policymakers with the best analytical evidence and data available to guide new public policies and regulations.Many of the conclusions and recommendations call for policy and regulatory reform. The evaluation recommends that FAO work with Indonesia to establish innovative data management systems, new analysis methods, and analytical tools on agriculture including fisheries and forestry.