Thumbnail Image

THE IMPACT OF THE URUGUAY ROUND ON TARIFF ESCALATION IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

ESCP/No. 3 - September 1997








Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    The Implications Of The Gatt Uruguay Round And Other Trade Arrangements For The Asia-Pacific Forest Products Trade
    Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper No: APFSOS/WP/03
    1997
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    An analysis of the significance for forest product import and export of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The likely impact on the countries of the Asia-Pacific region is discussed, with individual analysis for each country.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Tariffs in world seafood trade 2006
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Given that more than half of world seafood exports originate in developing countries, an objective in the current round of negotiations in the World Trade Organization (WTO) is to reduce seafood tariffs. This paper examines tariffs for seafood in 169 countries, covering most of world trade, and 143 out of 148 WTO members. Average applied tariffs for seafood in each country are mostly spread out between 0 and 30 percent, with a median at 14 percent. Weighted by the economic size of importing countries, the world average is 8-10 percent. For WTO members, only 60 percent of tariffs for seafood are bound - i.e. subject to upper bounds negotiated in the WTO. Bound tariff averages for seafood mostly range from 0 to 60 percent, with a median at 34 percent. Hence there is a considerable amount of "water in the tariffs"; as an example, a 40 percent proportional cut in bound tariffs worldwide may lead to a cut in applied tariffs of only 9 percent. Seafood tariffs are higher than tariffs for industrial goods; this is especially the case for applied tariffs. There is some tariff escalation with higher tariffs for processed goods, but the evidence on this is ambiguous. Preferential tariffs are of increasing importance in many countries, but some of the richest countries have low tariffs for all suppliers and this reduces the impact of preferences. For the European Union, Japan and some developing countries, however, preferences are important. Poor countries have, on average, higher tariffs and a lower extent of tariff binding than rich countries. There is, however, great heterogeneity, so there are also free traders among the poorest countries.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Policy brief
    Evolution of import tariffs and the issue of tariff escalation 2017
    Also available in:

    Evolution of import tariffs and the issue of tariff escalation This brief provides an overview of the evolution in bound and applied tariffs with a focus on tariff escalation.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.