Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
Book (stand-alone)Technical bookFlexible Multi-Partner Mechanism
Annual Report 2018
2020Also available in:
No results found.The FMM Annual Report for 2018 highlights the concrete results achieved through the continued support of key resource partners. This report details initiatives, innovations, impacts, outcomes and human-centered stories from the field. The report shows how deepening our engagement with resource partners and fostering new alliances is vital to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The work reported here was largely an extension of the implementation of projects funded during the last phase (2014–2017), and some bridging funds supported by generous contributions to the FMM from the governments of Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. This FMM Annual Report for 2018 briefly outlined the results achieved in 27 projects, the lessons learned and challenges encountered. The Annual Report 2018 builds on the progress made since the 2014–2017 medium-term final report. It must be noted that during this reporting period, most of the projects were on no-cost extensions and focused on wrapping up the activities, disseminating results and finalizing evaluations and analyses that were not completed in 2017. In some cases, the projects also helped in catalyzing resource mobilization and scaling up of some activities. In preparation of this report, great care was taken not to duplicate information presented in the 2014–2017 medium term final report and also not to miss out on activities that were carried out in 2017 but not reported in the 2014–2017 report. FAO is pleased to present the results achieved in 2018 through this uniquely flexible funding mechanism in this report. This report does not include new -
Book (stand-alone)General interest bookThe Flexible Multi-partner Mechanism (FMM)
2019 Annual Progress Report
2020Also available in:
No results found.The year 2019 marked a time of growth and renewed commitments for FAO’s Flexible Multi-Partner Mechanism (FMM), the main pooled funding mechanism for resource partners to contribute flexible, voluntary, annual, and multi-year resources to the Organization for the achievement of results under FAO’s Strategic Framework and the realization of catalytic impact. This annual report provides an overview of major improvements and transformational changes to the FMM since 2018, in addition to presenting key achievements, challenges, and lessons learned thus far in the implementation of the Fund in 2019. -
Book (stand-alone)General interest bookThe Flexible Multi-Partner Mechanism
2021 Annual Progress Report (Annex B)
2022Also available in:
No results found.The Flexible Multi-Partner Mechanism (FMM), as FAO’s main pooled multi-partner flexible funding instrument, enables resource partners to contribute voluntary and less-earmarked financial resources to support the delivery of programmatic results under FAO’s Strategic Framework. This annex contains the key achievements of individual FMM Subprogrammes in 2021, as reported by their respective implementing units. The annex compliments the results presented in The Flexible Multi-Partner Mechanism – 2021 Annual Progress Report.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
DocumentEvaluation reportFinal evaluation of Capacity building for South African Professionals in the Field of Agriculture and Food Security (GCP/RAF/412/SAF). 2016
Also available in:
No results found. -
Book (series)Evaluation reportEvaluation of the project “Strengthening the role of women in peacebuilding through natural resources management at the community level in the rural areas of the governorates of Sana’a and Lahaj in Yemen”
Project code: UNJP/YEM/038/PBF
2021Also available in:
No results found.Women have traditionally played a role in water conflict resolution in rural areas. The most transformative change the project has achieved is the institutionalization of this role through the Water User Associations (WUAs) so that women gain further acceptance within their communities. The evaluation found that FAO and IOM should further explore the catalytic effect of this project in sustaining local peace prospects, particularly with an enhanced role for women in conflict resolution, and should build a necessary link to the national peacebuilding efforts. This could be done through a cascading programming, i.e. two-three PBF projects to be designed and implemented sequentially so they can have a better chance to contribute to higher order outcomes. The successful resolution of water conflicts and the restoration of water infrastructure through the CfW component had a direct effect on increased crop production and income of farmers. The measures in place to promote the sustainability of the project and the continuation of improved agriculture once the project has come to an end rely on the increased capacity of WUAs to use their conflict resolution skills, maintain the sites and find further support. Youth were not explicitly targeted in conflict resolution activities but they represented the majority of the beneficiaries of cash for work (CfW) activities. FAO and IOM should have a targeted approach if they are to work on youth, peace and security. They should also do a thorough assessment of the socioeconomic impacts of CfW on the Yemen context before rolling about a programme-wide CfW or cash transfer activities in Yemen. -
Book (series)Evaluation reportEvaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Republic of Indonesia 2016–2020 2021
Also available in:
No results found.There are numerous risks to the sustainability and stability of Indonesia’s farming system, food production system, supply chains, and ecosystems. The evaluation aims to answer two essential questions: whether FAO is doing what is needed and whether it is making a difference.This evaluation recommends that FAO support the green and blue (land and sea) preparedness and adaptation plans, as well as early warning systems. The evaluation further recommends that FAO ramp up its support for a national decision support system that adopts a food systems approach to provide policymakers with the best analytical evidence and data available to guide new public policies and regulations.Many of the conclusions and recommendations call for policy and regulatory reform. The evaluation recommends that FAO work with Indonesia to establish innovative data management systems, new analysis methods, and analytical tools on agriculture including fisheries and forestry.