Thumbnail Image

Guidelines for biodiversity monitoring

Conservation and Sustainable Management of Turkey’s Steppe Ecosystems Project – GCP/TUR/061/GFF









Jungmeier, M. and Arpa, N.Y. 2022. Guidelines for biodiversity monitoring. Ankara, FAO and MAF. 




Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Guidelines on forest biodiversity monitoring methodologies for Central Asian countries 2023
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    For effective forest biodiversity monitoring in FAO Sub-regional Office for Central Asia (SEC) countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Türkiye), it is important to develop cost-effective and efficient monitoring methods. The main purpose of the guidelines on forest biodiversity monitoring methodologies is to support FAOSEC countries in their efforts to detect changes in forest biodiversity and to ensure that appropriate measures are taken for sustainable forest management.The monitoring process begins with the assessment of monitoring requirements and the establishment of specific goals for the subsequent development of the monitoring approach. Subsequently, essential factors such as indicators, methods and tools for monitoring, team composition, frequency of monitoring, and data management are identified to shape the monitoring initiative, integrating aspects related to the state, impact, and response. The monitoring process is then concluded through the practical implementation of the program via field investigations, analysis and interpretation of the gathered information, and dissemination of resultant reports to pertinent stakeholders. The guidelines for forest biodiversity monitoring methodologies employ this comprehensive five-step monitoring cycle as a foundation for crafting an efficient forest biodiversity monitoring program.The guidelines on forest biodiversity monitoring methodologies are designed to take into account the changes in pressure, state and response indicators especially for biodiversity monitoring with the contributions of subject-matter experts. This study uses the "Pressure-State-Response" framework that has been frequently used in different global, regional, and national monitoring programs. In the guidelines, monitoring targets for species, habitats, ecosystem services, and forestry practices are defined for each monitoring component by using relevant indicators. Using Türkiye’s national biodiversity database (Noah’s Ark Database) and its monitoring tables as samples, the indicators are tabulated with detailed information on the following topics: • Monitoring Level• Monitoring Period and Frequency• Monitoring Area• Monitoring Method• Monitoring Team/Expertise• Target / Success CriteriaFor effective implementation of the guidelines, a governance mechanism is also proposed for the participation of regional and national stakeholders.The guidelines serve as a comprehensive framework for monitoring forest biodiversity in FAOSEC countries with the aim of providing practical guidance and recommendations for establishing effective forest biodiversity monitoring systems in those countries. The guidelines also emphasize the importance of harmonization and standardization of biodiversity indicators and methods across countries, enhancing comparability and facilitating regional and global reporting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Guidelines for assessing the management effectiveness of protected areas
    Conservation and Sustainable Management of Turkey’s Steppe Ecosystems Project – GCP/TUR/061/GFF
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This set of Guidelines is aimed at protected area staff, conservation scientists, managers and stakeholders involved in the management of protected areas in Turkey. It provides substantial support to protected area planners, decisionmakers and managers, and staff of the MAF, helping them to assess and improve management effectiveness for protected areas and monitor regularly the management effectiveness of these unique and valuable sites. Protected areas are the cornerstone of biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem services conservation. However, unprecedented global losses due mainly to human activities are exerting pressure on these sites. Achieving long-term sustainability and the expected benefits of these areas requires effective management, a key to which is a well-prepared management plan. A second vital component for effective protected area management – in addition to legal and administrative regulations and management plans – is the availability of quantitatively and qualitatively equipped human resources. The third element necessary to ensuring that management and protection goals are achieved in a protected area is the establishment of participative opportunities and the integration of purposeful processes that include all relevant stakeholders. The mechanism for management effectiveness assessment evaluates the presence and efficiency of all of these aspects.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Guidelines for grazing and livestock monitoring 2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This document is one of seven sets of guidelines developed to provide standards and recommendations for the integrated management of the country’s natural assets. The Guidelines for Grazing and Livestock Monitoring offer a methodology, sets of indicators and a framework to holistically and coherently assess these two variables, livestock and steppe productivity. They are addressed to decision-makers, staff of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), national and regional grazing management plan authorities, local and regional institutions who will participate in monitoring, shepherds and any other relevant stakeholders.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.