Thumbnail Image

Digital transformation and land administration

Sustainable practices from the UNECE region and beyond









FAO, UNECE and FIG. 2022. Digital transformation and land administration: sustainable practices from the UNECE region and beyond. FIG Publication, No. 80. Rome, FAO, UNECE and FIG. 





Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Policy brief
    Funding digital transformation of land administration 2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Digital transformation involves changing land administration systems from paper to 100 percent digital. It leads to greater activity and better efficiency in land markets, improves government revenues and stimulates growth. It delivers greater accountability, better transparency and service quality for all land stakeholders and reduces the potential for corrupt transactions. Providing secure funding for this transformation should be among every country’s priorities. This Brief offers clear, practical guidance to decision-makers and leaders on how to implement this essential process.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Good governance in land tenure and administration
    FAO Land Tenure Studies 9
    2007
    This guide is written for people who work in land administration and all those with an interest in land, land tenure and their governance. Although much has been written about the importance of good governance in achieving development goals, there is comparatively little material on good governance in land tenure and administration. Failings in governance have adverse consequences for society as a whole. By contrast, good governance can help achieve economic development and the reduc tion of poverty. Good governance matters.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Policy brief
    The impact of improved land administration in Nicaragua 2021
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    An impact evaluation of Nicaragua’s Land Administration Programme (PRODEP) finds that the programme ensured gender equality in the access to land titles, with women landholders more likely to obtain titles than men landholders. The programme also significantly increased beneficiaries’ perception of high tenure security, and title-holders were more likely to report that their land had increased its value. However, the lack of impacts in other household-level investments provides policy insights on the need of complementarity support measures for landowners.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.