Much of project design, supervision and evaluation work undertaken on behalf of FAO, trust funds and international financing institutions is done through short visits ("missions") to developing countries by staff and international consultants in connection with teams of local counterparts. The typical duration of project design missions is around 3 weeks. Supervision and evaluation missions are usually even shorter - two weeks on average. Under such time pressure, does it still make sense to attempt a rapid diagnosis of local institutions and livelihoods in the context of project design, implementation support and evaluation missions? The answer is "yes": even a rapid diagnostic has the potential to make an enormous difference for development projects and their poverty outcomes.
The profile of a typical mission is the following:
Report finalisation.
The challenge addressed by Module 2 in the Rapid Guide for Missions is to adapt the process required for analysis of livelihoods and local institutions to the time and resources available on a typical mission. The model we are proposing builds on what most missions are already doing. It involves the following elements and steps:
Inception meeting with stakeholders (2-4 hours, either in the project area or the capital city)
Agree on what geographic areas and activities the mission should visit
Key informant interviews at region, district and below district levels (1/2 day each district)
NGOs, civil society organizations and private sector
Community-level field work[4] (5-10 days depending on time availability)
Select villages typical of different agro-ecological zones (AEZs), ethnic groups, production or livelihood systems (3 -7 villages)
Village-level investigations - 1-2 days per village
Continuous qualitative data analysis with team members followed by 1-2 days for cross-cutting analysis and brainstorming
Wrap-up meeting to share findings and discuss implications with in-country stakeholders
Flow chart for rapid diagnostic study during a mission
The Rapid Guide that follows consists of 8 modules and corresponding sets of checklists that can be used to enable missions to understand local institutions and livelihoods in the context of project design, implementation support and evaluation work.
Name of module |
Page |
Related checklists |
Page |
Name of module |
1. Livelihoods, poverty and institutions |
1 |
(None: definitions and conceptual framework) |
2 |
|
2. Rapid livelihood and institutional analysis for missions |
|
Flowchart for a rapid diagnostic study during missions |
3 |
Intended as an overview of steps in the mission process |
3. District institutional profiles |
|
Checklist 3A - Questions for district officials |
10 |
Checklists 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D are intended as a guide for semi-structured
interviews with government, NGOs, political leaders and private sector
at district level |
4. Community profile |
18 |
Checklist 4A - Questions for a community profile |
18 |
Checklist 4A is intended to guide semi-structured interviews with community
leaders |
5. Understanding household livelihoods |
22 |
Checklist 5A - Questions on household livelihood strategies |
22 |
Checklist 5A is for interviews with individual households selected to
illustrate livelihood systems of each socio-economic stratum at community
level. Analysis focuses on differences by wealth, gender, age, ethnicity
and production system |
6. Understanding community institutions |
24 |
Checklist 6 - Institutional attributes |
26 |
Checklists 6A, 6B and 6C are intended for interviews with community leaders
(modern and customary) as well as leaders of membership organizations. |
7. Analysis of linkages |
28 |
Checklist 7 - Guide for brainstorming on linkages |
30 |
Analysis focuses on how the socio-cultural and historical context influences
the assets of different types of households and how this affects their
ability to withstand shocks. |
8. Using the information |
29 |
Checklist 8 - Key policy or project design and implementation questions |
|
How to use the analysis of local institutions and livelihoods to design programmes and projects that better contribute to poverty reduction |
[3] E.g., 1 week for desk
review of relevant documents including project concept, donor corporate,
regional and country strategy documents plus the country's own policies and
strategies as stated in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and
agricultural sector strategy documents, plus socio-economic and cultural
background on likely project beneficiaries. [4] A small team (3 persons) might cover 3 villages, 1-2 days per village; a larger team might work together in the first village, then split and cover 2 villages in parallel (teams A & B in different villages on the same day) |