The cultivation of sugarcane in Malaysia is surprisingly small.
Production is concentrated in the Northwest extremity of peninsular Malaysia in the states
of Perlis and Kedah (Figure 1). This area has a distinct dry season needed for
cost-efficient sugarcane production. Plantings in the states of Perak and Negri Sembilan
were unsuccessful due to high unit costs as producing conditions were less suitable. Areas
for potential expansion have been identified in the state of Johore and in Sarawak, but no
projects have yet been undertaken.
In recent years the sugarcane harvested area has averaged between 20
000 and 24 000 hectares (Table 1). Most of the cane areas is under the management of
three sugarcane plantations, two in the State of Perlis and one in the state of
Kedah, with smallholders contributing only about 15 percent of the total. The lack of
growth in cane areas largely reflects the higher remuneration received by farmers for
other crops, especially oil palm. Over the past 20 years while the sugarcane area has
remained at around 20 000 hectares, that planted to oil palm has expanded from 600 000
hectares to 2.2 million hectares. Other leading crops in terms of planted areas are rubber
with 1.8 million hectares, rice with 670 000 hectares and cocoa with 380 000 hectares.
Sugarcane yields have increased steadily over the years. They rose from
40 tonnes per hectare in 1980 to 65 tonnes per hectare in 1990 and reached 68 tonnes per
hectare in 1996. The increase in yields can be attributed to the planting of improved
varieties and greater input use. There are some annual fluctuations, but in recent years
yields have remained relatively constant. Differences in yields also exist between
plantations and smallholders with the latter's yields averaging generally around 40 tonnes
per hectare owing to reduced access to irrigation water.
Production of sugarcane generally ranges between 1.3 to 1.6 million
tonnes annually depending largely on yields. Sugar content has been around 7 percent. The
harvest takes place between January and April. Labour availability for harvesting is a
serious problem for the industry because of increasing employment in the country's
manufacturing sector. As the domestic producing area is near the border with Thailand, the
sugar industry has come to depend heavily on labour from this country, particularly during
the harvesting season. If the harvest is delayed, (e.g. by extended rain) into May or
June, labour shortages develop as these workers begin to return home to plant paddy rice
in southern Thailand. Because of labour constraints, the industry is planning a gradual
shift to mechanical harvesting.
PROCESSING
Malaysia has four sugarcane processing facilities, one each in the
states of Perlis, Kedah, Penang, and Selangor. Two of the facilities, Gula Padang in the
state of Kedah, and Perlis Plantations in the state of Perlis, are integrated mills
processing cane into raw and refined sugar with the added capability of refining imported
raw cane sugar. The other two facilities are refineries handling imported raw cane sugar.
One is the port-side refinery on peninsular Malaysia across from Penang island owned by
the Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Company (MSM). The other is the Central Sugar Refinery
(CSR) located near Kuala Lumpur in the state of Selangor. Malaysia's sugar processing
industry depends on imports for about 90 percent of its raw materials. With a total annual
refining capacity of over 1.0 million tonnes, all of the imported sugar is raw, with the
bulk being processed at the MSM and CSR refineries.
CONSUMPTION
Domestic consumption of sugar in Malaysia has increased rapidly in
recent years (Table 2). During the first half of the nineties, sugar consumption
averaged about 800 000 tonnes annually, compared with about 500 000 during the first-half
of the eighties, a 57 percent increase. In 1995, a record 1.03 million tonnes was consumed
and the provisional estimate for 1996 places consumption at 1.16 million tonnes.
Population and income growth account for most of the gains, as 66 percent of total sugar
consumption in Malaysia occurs in the household. However, the country’s buoyant
economy has also led to a particularly strong growth in the food processing industry. Ice
cream, chocolates, sweetened condensed milk, and soft drinks are some of the items that
have created new demand for sugar. On a per caput basis, the level of sugar consumption in
Malaysia at about 50 kilograms (raw equivalent) is among the highest of the region.
However, some of the sugar-containing products manufactured in the country are exported.
Substitute sweeteners have not made a big impact on the Malaysian
market. Apart from limited production of palm sugar which is required for cooking
traditional desserts, there is a corn wet-milling plant producing HFCS 42 which is used in
the manufacture of tomato and soy sauces. There are no statistics on these sweeteners, but
industry sources believe that the quantities involved are insignificant compared to the
total sweetener supply.
Non-nutritive sweeteners are making inroads in the Malaysian market.
However, the Ministry of Health closely regulates the use of these sugar substitutes. A
license is required to import, use, manufacture or sell non-nutritive sweeteners, and
detailed records of all transactions must be maintained. These products are limited to use
in low-energy or dietary foods and beverages, and all such products must be clearly
labelled as containing non-nutritive sweeteners. Relatively few dietary products are
manufactured in Malaysia, although diet soft drinks seem to be gaining in popularity.
Table sugar substitutes are also becoming more common. However, non-nutritive sweeteners
still make up only a small portion of the total sweetener market.
The Malaysian Government estimates domestic requirements each year and
sets a quota allocation for refiners and millers to supply the domestic market. Based upon
this estimate the refiners and millers are issued licenses to import raw sugar. Quantities
imported above these quotas require prior approval. The level of imports permitted is
dependent upon expected domestic production and may be adjusted according to the progress
of the crop. Tariffs on raw sugar imports are waived for the refiners and mills. Raw sugar
imported for re-export as refined sugar is also covered by licenses.
TRADE
Malaysia is a net sugar importing country. In 1995, imports of raw
sugar reached a record 1.0 million tonnes, while exports were 101 000 tonnes (Table 2).
Increasing quantities of sugar have had to be imported to meet rising demand and
compensate for the stagnant domestic production. For example, imports for the first 5
years of the 1990s averaged 885 000 tonnes per year, compared with 494 000 tonnes for the
first-half of the 1980s, a 79 percent increase. In recent years, sugar and corn have been
Malaysia's largest agricultural imports, with annual sugar imports valued at between
US$200 to 300 million.
The main suppliers of raw sugar to Malaysia are Australia, Thailand and
Fiji which account for 98 percent of total imports. For a number of years, Malaysia has
maintained long term agreements (LTA's) with Australia and Fiji for its sugar supplies.
Shipments under these LTA's have accounted for between 40 to 60 percent of annual import
requirements. Other import origins have been Cuba and the Philippines, but both have faded
in importance since the mid-1980s. Import licensing, administered by the Ministry of Trade
and Industry, has replaced the duty levied on imports of refined sugar.
The sugar industry also utilizes its excess refining capacity to
produce refined sugar for export. The key markets for that refined sugar have been nearby
Singapore and Indonesia, New Zealand and periodically South Asia and Middle Eastern
countries, especially Saudi Arabia. The Philippines have also imported refined sugar from
Malaysia in 1994 and
PRICES
Wholesale and retail prices for refined sugar in Malaysia are regulated
under the Supplies Regulation Act of 1974 and have remained at M$1 145 (US$452) per tonne
and M$1.20 per kilogram (US 47 cents a kilogram), respectively, since November 1989.
FUTURE PROSPECTS
The National Agricultural Policy Plan (NAP) for the period 1992 to 2010
gives minimal attention to sugar compared with oil palm and fruits and vegetables. Apart
from encouraging improvement in the productivity of existing areas and milling efficiency,
the Government is reportedly not anxious to foster expansion of sugarcane cultivation in
the country. However, support is extended to the industry through sugar import quotas and
relatively high domestic retail prices. According to the NAP, more research and
development efforts are to be channelled to the development of alternative sources for
sugar.
Sugar consumption can be expected to continue its upward trend in
Malaysia reflecting population and income growth. Higher incomes also translate into
growth in the consumption of processed foods containing sugar. Malaysia is likely to
import increasing quantities of raw sugar to meet domestic needs. The development of
re-export trade appears less certain. Unless refining capacity is expanded, a greater
share of domestically processed refined sugar will be retained in Malaysia and less will
be available for export. International market developments which would influence trends in
exports would include increasing competition from Australia in regional refined sugar
import markets and the impact of new raw sugar refineries in the Near East on import
demand for refined sugar from countries such as Malaysia. On trade policy, the general
view is that LTA's have served Malaysia well, and the agreements with Australia and Fiji
are likely to be renewed in the near future.
Table 1 : Malaysia sugarcane area, yield and production
Year |
Harvested area |
Yield |
Production |
|
'000 Ha |
Mt / Ha |
'000 Mt |
1976 |
25 |
35 |
870 |
1977 |
20 |
50 |
1 000 |
1978 |
21 |
45 |
963 |
1979 |
20 |
50 |
1 005 |
1980 |
18 |
40 |
720 |
1981 |
17 |
40 |
680 |
1982 |
20 |
50 |
985 |
1983 |
21 |
50 |
1 025 |
1984 |
22 |
50 |
1 100 |
1985 |
22 |
49.1 |
1 080 |
1986 |
23 |
53 |
1 219 |
1987 |
17 |
71 |
1 207 |
1988 |
19 |
60 |
1 140 |
1989 |
19 |
64 |
1 216 |
1990 |
20 |
65 |
1 300 |
1991 |
20 |
61 |
1 220 |
1992 |
20 |
66 |
1 320 |
1993 |
23 |
68 |
1 547 |
1994 |
23 |
68 |
1 541 |
1995 |
24 |
68 |
1 601 |
1996 |
24 |
68.1 |
1 600 |