A total of 1 354 introductions of 237 species into 140 countries are recorded in this document. These consist of records of the first introduction of any species into a country. Because many introductions of a species into any one country have been carried out on a repeated basis these represent only a part of those reported. Furthermore, these records do not include the sometimes extensive transport of a species within a country once it had been introduced.
Trends in time in the numbers of introductions are summarized in Table 1, from which it is apparent that the spread of exotic fish species around the world essentially dates from the middle of the nineteenth century. A few introductions, termed ancient or historical had occurred before this period. Typical of these is the history of the common carp which, perhaps, was spread to a limited extent by the Romans and, certainly, diffused throughout continental Europe in the 13 - 15th centuries along with monastic fish farming. Such movements, however, were isolated. Since 1850 the pattern of introductions has shown a steady increase, until 1960, when, at 41 introductions in one year, a peak in movements occurred.
After 1960 the rate of new introductions has apparently declined. This slackening in the rate of the international transport of species has several possible origins. Firstly, legislation in many areas of the world, which has arisen from a growing awareness of the possible negative consequences of species introductions, has slowed if not stopped the flow. Secondly, there may be a saturation effect whereby a species reaches a level where it has been introduced to all suitable recipient areas. These effects can be detected in Table 2 where the introduction rate of successive groups of species attains a peak and then diminishes relative to other groups.
Table 1
Number of Introductions per decade for which date of introduction is known
Date |
Number of introductions |
Date |
Number of introductions |
Ancient |
7 |
1910 - 1919 |
28 |
1800-1850 |
13 |
1920 - 1929 |
59 |
1850-1859 |
4 |
1930 - 1939 |
65 |
1860-1869 |
9 |
1940 - 1949 |
53 |
1870-1879 |
20 |
1950 - 1959 |
166 |
1880-1889 |
33 |
1960 - 1969 |
200 |
1890-1899 |
38 |
1970 - 1979 |
175 |
1900-1909 |
51 |
1980 - 1985 |
62 |
Table 2
Percentage by major species groups introduced during each decade since 1900
Decade |
Salmonids |
Centrarchids |
Tilapias |
Carps |
Crustacea |
Other |
Pre 1900 |
45.9 |
9.9 |
|
2.7 |
0.9 |
40.5 |
1900 |
50.0 |
14.6 |
|
8.3 |
2.1 |
18.8 |
1910 |
15.4 |
7.7 |
|
|
|
76.9 |
1920 |
14.5 |
9.1 |
|
|
1.8 |
74.5 |
1930 |
21.9 |
21.9 |
1.6 |
|
|
54.7 |
1940 |
16.7 |
20.4 |
16.7 |
3.7 |
1.9 |
40.7 |
1950 |
11.8 |
15.5 |
46.6 |
1.2 |
6 |
24.2 |
1960 |
12.5 |
4.0 |
23.5 |
16.5 |
5.5 |
38.0 |
1970 |
9.8 |
2.4 |
7.3 |
28.0 |
2.4 |
50.0 |
1980 |
6.5 |
|
17.4 |
13.0 |
23.9 |
39.1 |
Total |
18.6 |
9.4 |
16.4 |
10.3 |
3.3 |
41.7 |
The frequency of introduction of individual species varies considerably (Table 3) and the majority of species have only been introduced to few countries. Eighty six percent of the species that have been introduced have been recorded from 10 countries or less and 40% have been recorded from only one country. At the other extreme, 9 species have been introduced into more than 30 countries. Many of these species are very widespread throughout the world, and three in particular, Cyprinus carpio, Oreochromis mossambicus and Salmo gairdneri, each with over 50 host countries, have become pan-global within the limits set by their thermal tolerance.
A country or region may be also expected to attain a state where it has received all suitable species, and perhaps many that are not suitable. Such effects at the national or regional level are more difficult to detect because of the bias introduced by the large number of introductions that were carried out between 1950 and 1980.
Table 3
List of species and the number of countries into which they have been introduced listed in numerical order
Species |
Number of countries |
96 species |
1 |
34 species |
2 |
20 species |
3 |
15 species |
4 |
12 species |
5 |
8 species |
6 |
12 species |
7 |
3 species |
8 |
2 species |
9 |
1 species |
10 |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; Osphronemus gourami; |
|
Procambarus clarkii; Salvelinus namaycush; |
|
Xiphophorus helleri |
11 |
Ictalurus melas |
13 |
Lepomis cyanellus; Lepomis gibbosus; |
|
Oreochromis macrochir |
14 |
Micropterus dolomieui; Oreochromis hornorum; |
|
Tinca tinca |
15 |
Ictalurus punctatus; Tilapia zillii |
16 |
Oreochromis aureus |
17 |
Lepomis macrochirus |
18 |
Poecilia reticulata |
24 |
Aristichthys nobilis; Carassius auratus; |
|
Tilapia rendalli |
26 |
Salmo trutta |
29 |
Gambusia affinis |
32 |
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
38 |
Oreochromis niloticus |
38 |
Salvelinus fontinalis |
39 |
Ctenopharyngodon idella; Micropterus salmoides |
49 |
Cyprinus carpio |
59 |
Oreochromis mossambicus |
66 |
Salmo gairdneri |
82 |
Table 4, which shows the number of species introduced into different continental areas each decade, gives no indication that this process occurred. On the contrary, the impression is that the rate of introductions was sustained in all areas until the 1960's and declined thereafter. Interesting details are that Europe had an early history of introduction in the later decades of the 19th century and maintained a high rate of introductions until the 1970's. Introductions into Africa started later and reached a peak in the 1950's. The rate of introductions into South and Central America on the other hand continued to increase until the present, and this region is now the major importer of fish species.
Table 4
Number of species introduced into different continents by decade
Decade |
Africa |
Asia/ |
Europe |
Middle East |
North |
Oceania |
South |
Total |
Ancient |
|
1 |
4 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
7 |
Pre 1850 |
|
4 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
1850 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
4 |
1860 |
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
1 |
9 |
1870 |
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
6 |
2 |
20 |
1880 |
|
2 |
27 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
33 |
1890 |
2 |
1 |
27 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
38 |
1900 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
|
1 |
10 |
17 |
51 |
1910 |
6 |
11 |
5 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
28 |
1920 |
19 |
6 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
59 |
1930 |
16 |
11 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
17 |
65 |
1940 |
12 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
|
5 |
21 |
53 |
1950 |
67 |
21 |
11 |
1 |
9 |
13 |
44 |
166 |
1960 |
44 |
37 |
40 |
7 |
10 |
21 |
41 |
200 |
1970 |
35 |
20 |
43 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
71 |
175 |
1980 |
1 |
7 |
14 |
|
1 |
2 |
37 |
62 |
Total |
208 |
140 |
237 |
12 |
35 |
60 |
271 |
983 |
Unknown |
48 |
45 |
57 |
4 |
54 |
80 |
72 |
360 |
TOTAL |
256 |
185 |
294 |
16 |
89 |
160 |
343 |
1 343 |
Species/ |
5.0 |
8.4 |
10.5. |
1.24 |
4.5 |
16.0 |
10.7 |
8.5 |
This Table provides information on the different intensities of introductions in various regions. North America, South and Central America, Europe and Oceania are all areas where the number of introductions per country is high relative to the mean, whereas in Africa and the Middle East this index is low and Asia is almost at the average level. This situation is confirmed when the analysis is carried out by individual country (Table 5).
Table 5
List of countries and the number of species they have received, listed in numerical order
Country |
Species |
29 countries |
1 |
6 countries |
2 |
14 countries |
3 |
6 countries |
4 |
15 countries |
5 |
5 countries |
6 |
4 countries |
7 |
5 countries |
8 |
10 countries |
9 |
5 countries |
10 |
Congo, Costa Rica, Korea, Thailand |
11 |
Bolivia, Finland, Ivory Coast, Morocco |
12 |
Hungary, Poland |
13 |
Argentina, Denmark, Guam, India, Yugoslavia |
14 |
Japan |
15 |
Canada, Indonesia, Kenya |
17 |
Zimbabwe |
18 |
Dominican Republic, Fiji, Italy, New Zealand |
19 |
Belgium, Brazil, France, Mauritius, Peru |
20 |
Cyprus, South Africa, Soviet Union |
21 |
Chile, Cuba |
22 |
Germany (F.R.), Madagascar, Philippines, United Kingdom |
23 |
Puerto Rico, Sri Lanka, Netherlands |
24 |
Panama |
29 |
Mexico |
33 |
Colombia |
40 |
Hawaii |
44 |
Continental United States |
70 |
The logic behind these intensities of introduction is sometimes unclear. The presence of many island states (irrespective of region) and of European countries in the list of major receivers of exotic species is understandable as both categories generally have impoverished fish faunas. It is difficult to explain the large number of introductions into the countries of North, Central and South America. Here there are numerous species capable of fulfilling most of the functions for which fish are usually introduced, and which have themselves been exported to other regions for these purposes. The rationale for these introductions clearly lies elsewhere.