Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


TRENDS IN INTRODUCTIONS

A total of 1 354 introductions of 237 species into 140 countries are recorded in this document. These consist of records of the first introduction of any species into a country. Because many introductions of a species into any one country have been carried out on a repeated basis these represent only a part of those reported. Furthermore, these records do not include the sometimes extensive transport of a species within a country once it had been introduced.

Trends in time in the numbers of introductions are summarized in Table 1, from which it is apparent that the spread of exotic fish species around the world essentially dates from the middle of the nineteenth century. A few introductions, termed ancient or historical had occurred before this period. Typical of these is the history of the common carp which, perhaps, was spread to a limited extent by the Romans and, certainly, diffused throughout continental Europe in the 13 - 15th centuries along with monastic fish farming. Such movements, however, were isolated. Since 1850 the pattern of introductions has shown a steady increase, until 1960, when, at 41 introductions in one year, a peak in movements occurred.

After 1960 the rate of new introductions has apparently declined. This slackening in the rate of the international transport of species has several possible origins. Firstly, legislation in many areas of the world, which has arisen from a growing awareness of the possible negative consequences of species introductions, has slowed if not stopped the flow. Secondly, there may be a saturation effect whereby a species reaches a level where it has been introduced to all suitable recipient areas. These effects can be detected in Table 2 where the introduction rate of successive groups of species attains a peak and then diminishes relative to other groups.

Table 1
Number of Introductions per decade for which date of introduction is known

Date

Number of introductions

Date

Number of introductions

Ancient

7

1910 - 1919

28

1800-1850

13

1920 - 1929

59

1850-1859

4

1930 - 1939

65

1860-1869

9

1940 - 1949

53

1870-1879

20

1950 - 1959

166

1880-1889

33

1960 - 1969

200

1890-1899

38

1970 - 1979

175

1900-1909

51

1980 - 1985

62

Table 2
Percentage by major species groups introduced during each decade since 1900

Decade

Salmonids

Centrarchids

Tilapias

Carps

Crustacea

Other

Pre 1900

45.9

9.9


2.7

0.9

40.5

1900

50.0

14.6


8.3

2.1

18.8

1910

15.4

7.7




76.9

1920

14.5

9.1



1.8

74.5

1930

21.9

21.9

1.6



54.7

1940

16.7

20.4

16.7

3.7

1.9

40.7

1950

11.8

15.5

46.6

1.2

6

24.2

1960

12.5

4.0

23.5

16.5

5.5

38.0

1970

9.8

2.4

7.3

28.0

2.4

50.0

1980

6.5


17.4

13.0

23.9

39.1

Total

18.6

9.4

16.4

10.3

3.3

41.7

The frequency of introduction of individual species varies considerably (Table 3) and the majority of species have only been introduced to few countries. Eighty six percent of the species that have been introduced have been recorded from 10 countries or less and 40% have been recorded from only one country. At the other extreme, 9 species have been introduced into more than 30 countries. Many of these species are very widespread throughout the world, and three in particular, Cyprinus carpio, Oreochromis mossambicus and Salmo gairdneri, each with over 50 host countries, have become pan-global within the limits set by their thermal tolerance.

A country or region may be also expected to attain a state where it has received all suitable species, and perhaps many that are not suitable. Such effects at the national or regional level are more difficult to detect because of the bias introduced by the large number of introductions that were carried out between 1950 and 1980.

Table 3
List of species and the number of countries into which they have been introduced listed in numerical order

Species

Number of countries

96 species

1

34 species

2

20 species

3

15 species

4

12 species

5

8 species

6

12 species

7

3 species

8

2 species

9

1 species

10

Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; Osphronemus gourami;


Procambarus clarkii; Salvelinus namaycush;


Xiphophorus helleri

11

Ictalurus melas

13

Lepomis cyanellus; Lepomis gibbosus;


Oreochromis macrochir

14

Micropterus dolomieui; Oreochromis hornorum;


Tinca tinca

15

Ictalurus punctatus; Tilapia zillii

16

Oreochromis aureus

17

Lepomis macrochirus

18

Poecilia reticulata

24

Aristichthys nobilis; Carassius auratus;


Tilapia rendalli

26

Salmo trutta

29

Gambusia affinis

32

Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

38

Oreochromis niloticus

38

Salvelinus fontinalis

39

Ctenopharyngodon idella; Micropterus salmoides

49

Cyprinus carpio

59

Oreochromis mossambicus

66

Salmo gairdneri

82

Table 4, which shows the number of species introduced into different continental areas each decade, gives no indication that this process occurred. On the contrary, the impression is that the rate of introductions was sustained in all areas until the 1960's and declined thereafter. Interesting details are that Europe had an early history of introduction in the later decades of the 19th century and maintained a high rate of introductions until the 1970's. Introductions into Africa started later and reached a peak in the 1950's. The rate of introductions into South and Central America on the other hand continued to increase until the present, and this region is now the major importer of fish species.

Table 4
Number of species introduced into different continents by decade

Decade

Africa

Asia/
USSR

Europe

Middle East

North
America

Oceania

South
America

Total

Ancient


1

4


1

1


7

Pre 1850


4

9





13

1850

2






2

4

1860

1


2



5

1

9

1870


3

9



6

2

20

1880


2

27


3


1

33

1890

2

1

27


4


4

38

1900

3

6

14


1

10

17

51

1910

6

11

5


1


5

28

1920

19

6

14

1

2

9

8

59

1930

16

11

14

1

1

5

17

65

1940

12

10

4

1


5

21

53

1950

67

21

11

1

9

13

44

166

1960

44

37

40

7

10

21

41

200

1970

35

20

43

1

2

3

71

175

1980

1

7

14


1

2

37

62

Total

208

140

237

12

35

60

271

983

Unknown

48

45

57

4

54

80

72

360

TOTAL

256

185

294

16

89

160

343

1 343

Species/
Country

5.0

8.4

10.5.

1.24

4.5

16.0

10.7

8.5

This Table provides information on the different intensities of introductions in various regions. North America, South and Central America, Europe and Oceania are all areas where the number of introductions per country is high relative to the mean, whereas in Africa and the Middle East this index is low and Asia is almost at the average level. This situation is confirmed when the analysis is carried out by individual country (Table 5).

Table 5
List of countries and the number of species they have received, listed in numerical order

Country

Species

29 countries

1

6 countries

2

14 countries

3

6 countries

4

15 countries

5

5 countries

6

4 countries

7

5 countries

8

10 countries

9

5 countries

10

Congo, Costa Rica, Korea, Thailand

11

Bolivia, Finland, Ivory Coast, Morocco

12

Hungary, Poland

13

Argentina, Denmark, Guam, India, Yugoslavia

14

Japan

15

Canada, Indonesia, Kenya

17

Zimbabwe

18

Dominican Republic, Fiji, Italy, New Zealand

19

Belgium, Brazil, France, Mauritius, Peru

20

Cyprus, South Africa, Soviet Union

21

Chile, Cuba

22

Germany (F.R.), Madagascar, Philippines, United Kingdom

23

Puerto Rico, Sri Lanka, Netherlands

24

Panama

29

Mexico

33

Colombia

40

Hawaii

44

Continental United States

70

The logic behind these intensities of introduction is sometimes unclear. The presence of many island states (irrespective of region) and of European countries in the list of major receivers of exotic species is understandable as both categories generally have impoverished fish faunas. It is difficult to explain the large number of introductions into the countries of North, Central and South America. Here there are numerous species capable of fulfilling most of the functions for which fish are usually introduced, and which have themselves been exported to other regions for these purposes. The rationale for these introductions clearly lies elsewhere.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page