Swine growers can be classified as independent, integrated and cooperatives. See Table 6.14. The last two follow similar rules and may present similar performances as well. Independent swine growers often operate in complete cycle system. Integrated and cooperative farmers may operate either as piglets producers or finishers. In the new projects in the center west this type of separation is more frequently observed.
Industry meat type of swine tend to have a mean weight of 100kg or more. See Table 6.15. Animals designed to fresh meat market hardly reach 110kg. With the exception of Mato Grosso where independent production is directed to industry, in other states farmers are divided into two distinct groups: light weight animals produced by independent farmers for the fresh meat market and heavy weight animal produced by integrated farmers for the processing industry. It is possible that production of heavy weight animals by integrated farmers is related to more efficiency (lower per kilo cost)
Table 6.14 Coordination and production systems by farm size
|
State |
Finished Class |
Cooperatives |
Complete Independent |
Integrated |
Complete |
Independent |
Finisher Cooperatives |
Integrated |
Finisher |
Total |
|
GO |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 -1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 1000 |
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
|
GO Total |
|
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MG |
101 -1000 |
|
4,8% |
|
4,8% |
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
3,6% |
|
> 1000 |
|
95,2% |
|
95,2% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
96,4% |
|
|
MG Total |
|
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MS |
101 -1000 |
10,0% |
|
|
9,1% |
|
|
|
|
3,6% |
|
> 1000 |
90,0% |
100,0% |
|
90,9% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
96,4% |
|
|
MS Total |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MT |
101 -1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 1000 |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
|
MT Total |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR |
101 -1000 |
33,3% |
|
|
16,7% |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
|
> 1000 |
66,7% |
100,0% |
|
83,3% |
|
|
|
|
83,3% |
|
|
PR Total |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RS |
101 -1000 |
|
33,3% |
|
23,1% |
|
|
|
|
20,0% |
|
> 1000 |
100,0% |
66,7% |
100,0% |
76,9% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
80,0% |
|
|
RS Total |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
101 -1000 |
40,0% |
|
52,6% |
42,9% |
|
|
40,0% |
36,4% |
41,0% |
|
> 1000 |
60,0% |
100,0% |
47,4% |
57,1% |
|
100,0% |
60,0% |
63,6% |
59,0% |
|
|
SC Total |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.15 Average weight per animal by farm size
|
State |
Class |
Cooperatives |
Complete Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Complete |
Cooperatives |
Finisher Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Finisher |
Mean General |
|
GO |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GO Total |
> 1000 |
|
93,60 |
|
93,60 |
|
|
114,33 |
114,33 |
104,91 |
| |
|
93,60 |
|
93,60 |
|
|
114,33 |
114,33 |
104,91 |
|
|
MG |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
120,00 |
|
120,00 |
|
|
|
|
120,00 |
|
|
MG Total |
> 1000 |
|
103,95 |
|
103,95 |
|
|
114,86 |
114,86 |
106,78 |
| |
|
104,71 |
|
104,71 |
|
|
114,86 |
114,86 |
107,25 |
|
|
MS |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
110,00 |
|
|
110,00 |
|
|
|
|
110,00 |
|
|
MS Total |
> 1000 |
109,28 |
105,00 |
|
108,85 |
|
|
121,00 |
121,00 |
116,50 |
| |
109,35 |
105,00 |
|
108,95 |
|
|
121,00 |
121,00 |
116,27 |
|
|
MT |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MT Total |
> 1000 |
115,00 |
128,33 |
|
125,00 |
113,83 |
|
|
113,83 |
118,30 |
| |
115,00 |
128,33 |
|
125,00 |
113,83 |
|
|
113,83 |
118,30 |
|
|
PR |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
100,00 |
|
|
100,00 |
|
|
|
|
100,00 |
|
|
PR Total |
> 1000 |
92,42 |
99,92 |
|
96,92 |
|
|
|
|
96,92 |
| |
93,93 |
99,92 |
|
97,20 |
|
|
|
|
97,20 |
|
|
RS |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
98,33 |
|
98,33 |
|
|
|
|
98,33 |
|
|
RS Total |
> 1000 |
102,80 |
103,00 |
115,00 |
105,36 |
|
|
117,00 |
117,00 |
107,30 |
| |
102,80 |
101,44 |
115,00 |
103,74 |
|
|
117,00 |
117,00 |
105,51 |
|
|
SC |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
114,00 |
|
118,30 |
117,58 |
|
|
105,00 |
105,00 |
114,44 |
|
|
SC Total |
> 1000 |
109,33 |
108,75 |
112,33 |
110,88 |
120,00 |
|
105,83 |
107,86 |
109,96 |
| |
111,20 |
108,75 |
115,47 |
113,75 |
120,00 |
|
105,50 |
106,82 |
111,79 |
|
|
Total |
|
106,08 |
104,17 |
115,43 |
107,19 |
114,71 |
|
115,14 |
115,08 |
109,91 |
Source: Cepea/FAO
The higher conversion rate by integrated farmers shown in Table 6.16. is possibly related to higher feed quality, technical assistance, and genetic factors provided by integrators. The case of Goiás is important to be emphasized because modern integrators provide much better conditions. Specialized independent finishers also present better conversion rates.
Apparently mortality rates are related to the mean age of buildings and facilities. This would be why newer and modern farms in the center west present lower mortality indexes than in the south, as indicated by Table 6.17.
Tables 6.18 to 6.20 suggest that integrated farmers and cooperatives tend to take better care of the disposing of dead animals and manure. This may be a result of the action of contractors and cooperatives, which are interested in preventing possible exporting difficulties related to environmental matters.
Tables 6.21 show that swine farmers operate in a diversified fashion, possibly as a means to reduce risk. The swine activity is in general quite risky particularly because of price volatility. Integrated farmers, however, face a lower price volatility and can operate with lower diversification.
As Table 6.22 indicates, rural credit is mainly provided (around 53%) by public commercial banks. Own saving resources are also relevant (21%). Credit cooperatives also play a relevant role for medium size farmrs.
The quantity of manure spread over the farm lies within the limits of 54 m3/ha/year recommended by EMBRAPA. See Table 6.23.
Table 6.24. indicates that the farmer is the major responsible actor to proceed to the cleaning of the manure produced in the farm.
As Table 6.25 shows the distance from the farm to the slaughter house is longer in the center west than in the south, what should be related to farm size. Integrated farms apparently tend to concentrate in the neighborhood of slaughter houses, as the contractor seeks to reduce transportation costs. Table 6.26 reports the distances form the farms to the nearest regional urban center. No clear relationship can be observed in this case.
Table 6.16 Average conversion ratio per animal by farm size.
|
State |
Class |
Cooperatives |
Complete Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Complete |
Cooperatives |
Finisher Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Finisher |
Mean General |
|
GO |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GO Total |
> 1000 |
|
3,02 |
|
3,02 |
|
|
2,28 |
2,28 |
2,62 |
| |
|
3,02 |
|
3,02 |
|
|
2,28 |
2,28 |
2,62 |
|
|
MG |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
2,47 |
|
2,47 |
|
|
|
|
2,47 |
|
|
MG Total |
> 1000 |
|
2,35 |
|
2,35 |
|
|
2,18 |
2,18 |
2,30 |
| |
|
2,35 |
|
2,35 |
|
|
2,18 |
2,18 |
2,31 |
|
|
MS |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
2,14 |
|
|
2,14 |
|
|
|
|
2,14 |
|
|
MS Total |
> 1000 |
2,25 |
2,77 |
|
2,30 |
|
|
2,25 |
2,25 |
2,27 |
| |
2,24 |
2,77 |
|
2,29 |
|
|
2,25 |
2,25 |
2,26 |
|
|
MT |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MT Total |
> 1000 |
2,12 |
2,26 |
|
2,22 |
2,09 |
|
|
2,09 |
2,14 |
| |
2,12 |
2,26 |
|
2,22 |
2,09 |
|
|
2,09 |
2,14 |
|
|
PR |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
2,65 |
|
|
2,65 |
|
|
|
|
2,65 |
|
|
PR Total |
> 1000 |
2,45 |
2,58 |
|
2,52 |
|
|
|
|
2,52 |
| |
2,49 |
2,58 |
|
2,54 |
|
|
|
|
2,54 |
|
|
RS |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
2,19 |
|
2,19 |
|
|
|
|
2,19 |
|
|
RS Total |
> 1000 |
2,68 |
2,65 |
2,31 |
2,59 |
|
|
1,92 |
1,92 |
2,48 |
| |
2,68 |
2,50 |
2,31 |
2,50 |
|
|
1,92 |
1,92 |
2,42 |
|
|
SC |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
2,10 |
|
2,14 |
2,13 |
|
|
2,36 |
2,36 |
2,19 |
|
|
SC Total |
> 1000 |
2,16 |
2,38 |
2,16 |
2,21 |
2,29 |
|
2,22 |
2,23 |
2,22 |
| |
2,14 |
2,38 |
2,15 |
2,18 |
2,29 |
|
2,28 |
2,28 |
2,21 |
|
|
Total |
|
2,30 |
2,48 |
2,16 |
2,37 |
2,12 |
|
2,23 |
2,22 |
2,31 |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.17 Average mortality proportion by size classification
|
State |
Class |
Cooperatives |
Complete Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Complete |
Cooperatives |
Finisher Independent |
Integrated |
Mean Finisher |
Mean General |
|
GO |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GO Total |
> 1000 |
|
0,09 |
|
0,09 |
|
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,05 |
| |
|
0,09 |
|
0,09 |
|
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,05 |
|
|
MG |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
0,08 |
|
0,08 |
|
|
|
|
0,08 |
|
|
MG Total |
> 1000 |
|
0,07 |
|
0,07 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,02 |
0,06 |
| |
|
0,07 |
|
0,07 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,02 |
0,06 |
|
|
MS Total |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
0,10 |
|
|
0,10 |
|
|
|
|
0,10 |
|
|
MS Total |
> 1000 |
0,10 |
0,13 |
|
0,10 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,02 |
0,05 |
| |
0,10 |
0,13 |
|
0,10 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,02 |
0,05 |
|
|
MT |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MT Total |
> 1000 |
0,07 |
0,05 |
|
0,06 |
0,017 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,03 |
| |
0,07 |
0,05 |
|
0,06 |
0,017 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,03 |
|
|
PR |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
0,05 |
|
|
0,05 |
|
|
|
|
0,05 |
|
|
PR Total |
> 1000 |
0,10 |
0,07 |
|
0,08 |
|
|
|
|
0,08 |
| |
0,09 |
0,07 |
|
0,08 |
|
|
|
|
0,08 |
|
|
RS |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
|
0,05 |
|
0,05 |
|
|
|
|
0,05 |
|
|
RS Total |
> 1000 |
0,14 |
0,09 |
0,09 |
0,10 |
|
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,08 |
| |
0,14 |
0,07 |
0,09 |
0,09 |
|
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,07 |
|
|
SC |
< 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 - 1000 |
0,22 |
|
0,12 |
0,14 |
|
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,11 |
|
|
SC Total |
> 1000 |
0,12 |
0,08 |
0,11 |
0,11 |
0,003 |
|
0,02 |
0,01 |
0,08 |
| |
0,16 |
0,08 |
0,12 |
0,12 |
0,003 |
|
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,09 |
|
|
Total |
|
0,11 |
0,08 |
0,11 |
0,09 |
0,015 |
|
0,02 |
0,02 |
0,07 |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.18 Disposal of dead animals by farm classes and production system
| |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
||||||||||
|
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
|||
|
Composting |
|
|
|
|
66,7% |
|
50,0% |
44% |
28,1% |
24,5% |
66,0% |
41,8% |
42,1% |
|
|
Burying |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
80,0% |
42,9% |
44% |
18,8% |
18,4% |
7,5% |
14,2% |
18,9% |
|
|
Cesspit |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
20,0% |
7,1% |
12% |
43,8% |
55,1% |
15,1% |
36,6% |
32,7% |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,4% |
2,0% |
11,3% |
7,5% |
6,3% |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
|
Source: Cepea/Fao
Table 6.19 Manure treatment systems by farm class and production system
| |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Manure treatment |
|
|
|
|
67% |
50% |
100% |
81% |
30% |
32% |
35% |
33% |
40% |
|
Lagoon with canvas |
|
|
|
|
17% |
33% |
0% |
12% |
20% |
16% |
36% |
27% |
25% |
|
Lagoon no canvas |
|
|
|
|
17% |
17% |
0% |
8% |
43% |
44% |
26% |
35% |
31% |
|
Decanter |
|
|
|
|
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
7% |
8% |
3% |
5% |
4% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Source: Cepea/Fao
Table 6.20 Responsibility for manure transporting
| |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Buyer |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
8,0% |
16,3% |
8,0% |
11,3% |
9,5% |
|
Farmer |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
78,6% |
87,5% |
92,0% |
77,6% |
72,0% |
78,2% |
79,7% |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
21,4% |
12,5% |
0,0% |
6,1% |
20,0% |
10,5% |
10,8% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.21 Farm activities by farm size and production system
|
Activity |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coope-ratives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Bovine |
|
|
|
|
7,7% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
1,7% |
3,8% |
7,4% |
8,1% |
7,0% |
6,1% |
|
Poultry |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
8,8% |
5,2% |
0,0% |
1,1% |
13,8% |
6,7% |
6,4% |
|
Crops |
|
|
|
|
38,5% |
9,1% |
23,5% |
24,1% |
37,7% |
22,3% |
15,4% |
22,2% |
22,6% |
|
Dairy |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
18,2% |
20,6% |
15,5% |
0,0% |
3,2% |
10,6% |
5,9% |
7,6% |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
15,4% |
27,3% |
5,9% |
12,1% |
9,4% |
18,1% |
12,2% |
13,7% |
13,4% |
|
Swine |
|
|
|
|
38,5% |
45,5% |
41,2% |
41,4% |
49,1% |
47,9% |
39,8% |
44,4% |
43,9% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.22 Sources of rural credit by size of farms and production systems
|
Source |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Private bank |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
6,3% |
4,0% |
0,0% |
16,9% |
7,0% |
9,7% |
8,9% |
|
Public bank |
|
|
|
|
50,0% |
0,0% |
50,0% |
44,0% |
54,5% |
46,2% |
63,2% |
54,2% |
52,8% |
|
BNDES |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
6,2% |
0,0% |
2,6% |
2,2% |
|
Credit Coop. |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
66,7% |
6,3% |
16,0% |
12,1% |
6,2% |
5,3% |
7,1% |
8,3% |
|
Integrator |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
6,3% |
4,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
1,8% |
0,6% |
1,1% |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
33,3% |
6,3% |
12,0% |
0,0% |
7,7% |
3,5% |
4,5% |
5,6% |
|
Own savings |
|
|
|
|
16,7% |
0,0% |
25,0% |
20,0% |
33,3% |
16,9% |
19,3% |
21,3% |
21,1% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
Source: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.23 Mean quantity of manure spread on the farm by type of crop and production systems.(m3 / ha/year)
|
Crop |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Mean |
|||||||||
|
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Cotton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,0 |
10,0 |
|
|
|
|
10,0 |
|
Black oat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,0 |
|
|
23,0 |
23,0 |
|
Sugar cane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,0 |
25,0 |
|
37,5 |
37,5 |
|
Edible beans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,0 |
30,0 |
40,0 |
4,0 |
|
22,0 |
26,0 |
|
Corn |
|
|
|
|
29,3 |
45,0 |
52,7 |
45,4 |
28,0 |
42,2 |
34,1 |
35,5 |
38,1 |
|
Pasture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soybeans |
|
|
|
|
20,0 |
|
|
20,0 |
26,6 |
35,0 |
22,8 |
27,2 |
26,2 |
|
Sorghum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,0 |
|
|
30,0 |
30,0 |
|
Wheat |
|
|
|
|
|
15,0 |
|
15,0 |
22,0 |
44,0 |
14,0 |
23,0 |
21,9 |
|
Triticale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,0 |
40,0 |
|
40,0 |
40,0 |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
|
25,3 |
37,5 |
45,3 |
37,9 |
28,4 |
38,5 |
29,3 |
31,9 |
33,2 |
Fonte: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.24 Responsibility for manure cleaning by farm size and production system
| |
< 100 |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
||
|
Buyer |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
0,0% |
8,0% |
16,3% |
8,0% |
11,3% |
9,5% |
|
Farmer |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
78,6% |
87,5% |
92,0% |
77,6% |
72,0% |
78,2% |
79,7% |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
0,0% |
0,0% |
21,4% |
12,5% |
0,0% |
6,1% |
20,0% |
10,5% |
10,8% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
100,0% |
Fonte: Cepea/FAO
Table 6.25 Distance from farm to slaughter houses by farm size and production systems
|
State |
Data |
101 - 1000 |
> 1000 |
Total |
||||||
|
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
Coopera-tives |
Indepen-dent |
Integra-ted |
Total |
|||
|
GO |
Max |
|
|
|
|
|
100,0 |
70,0 |
100,0 |
100,0 |
|
Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
50,2 |
49,5 |
49,8 |
49,8 |
|
|
Min |
|
|
|
|
|
5,0 |
35,0 |
5,0 |
5,0 |
|
|
MG |
Max |
|
7,0 |
|
7,0 |
|
270,0 |
90,0 |
270,0 |
270,0 |
|
Avg |
|
7,0 |
|
7,0 |
|
67,6 |
50,1 |
62,9 |
60,9 |
|
|
Min |
|
7,0 |
|
7,0 |
|
6,0 |
13,0 |
6,0 |
6,0 |
|
|
MS |
Max |
8,0 |
|
|
8,0 |
185,0 |
200,0 |
70,0 |
200,0 |
200,0 |
|
Avg |
8,0 |
|
|
8,0 |
33,3 |
200,0 |
48,6 |
49,1 |
47,6 |
|
|
Min |
8,0 |
|
|
8,0 |
3,0 |
200,0 |
6,0 |
3,0 |
3,0 |
|
|
MT |
Max |
|
|
|
|
100,0 |
520,0 |
|
520,0 |
520,0 |
|
Avg |
|
|
|
|
60,4 |
320,0 |
|
138,3 |
138,3 |
|
|
Min |
|
|
|
|
12,0 |
140,0 |
|
12,0 |
12,0 |
|
|
PR |
Max |
12,0 |
|
|
12,0 |
250,0 |
60,0 |
|
250,0 |
250,0 |
|
Avg |
12,0 |
|
|
12,0 |
137,5 |
30,0 |
|
77,8 |
65,8 |
|
|
Min |
12,0 |
|
|
12,0 |
60,0 |
5,0 |
|
5,0 |
5,0 |
|
|
RS |
Max |
|
35,0 |
|
35,0 |
36,0 |
70,0 |
20,0 |
70,0 |
70,0 |
|
Avg |
|
15,0 |
|
15,0 |
28,0 |
24,2 |
16,8 |
22,2 |
20,7 |
|
|
Min |
|
0,1 |
|
0,1 |
20,0 |
5,0 |
14,0 |
5,0 |
0,1 |
|
|
SC |
Max |
15,0 |
|
47,0 |
47,0 |
9,0 |
50,0 |
45,0 |
50,0 |
50,0 |
|
Avg |
11,0 |
|
29,5 |
27,0 |
6,0 |
19,5 |
21,6 |
18,5 |
21,9 |
|
|
Min |
7,0 |
|
6,0 |
6,0 |
4,0 |
4,0 |
6,0 |
4,0 |
4,0 |
|
|
Total |
Max |
15,0 |
35,0 |
47,0 |
47,0 |
250,0 |
520,0 |
90,0 |
520,0 |
520,0 |
|
Avg |
10,8 |
13,0 |
29,5 |
22,2 |
52,0 |
72,5 |
38,1 |
53,5 |
48,6 |
|
|
Min |
7,0 |
0,1 |
6,0 |
0,1 |
3,0 |
4,0 |
6,0 |
3,0 |
0,1 |
|
Source: Cepea/FAO
