A number of countries around the world have either their own or international authorities and organisations which will apply their rules to the classification of a ferrocement vessel. Amongst those that produce rules are the American Bureau of Shipping, The Australian Transport Advisory Council, Marine Department of New Zealand, and Det Norske Veritas of Norway. The latter produced tentative rules for the construction and classification of ferrocement vessels in 1974.
Whilst working in India, the American Bureau of Shipping was approached with a view to obtaining classification on future vessels built in India. Set out below are the guidelines produced in June 1986:
"To consider a ferrocement vessel for classification the following plans and data are to be submitted for our review.
1. Drawings showing the particulars, arrangements and details of the principal parts of the hull structure, including tanks with information on height of overflow pipes, and a construction schedule giving details of material specifications, mixes, reinforcements, mortar application and curing procedures are to be submitted in quadruplicate and approved before work on construction commences."The necessity for testing prior to construction is in order to establish the quality of the material and the efficiency of the production as any deficiencies in test requirements after the commencement of construction can be extremely costly and difficult to accommodate.
"For reviewing the structural details of fishing vessels we would obtain required steel scantlings from our Rule for Steel Vessels Under 61 m in Length and convert these to ferrocement scantlings using the following relations:
Where
ffc |
= |
Allowable tensile stress in ferrocement |
SMfc |
= |
Section modulus of ferrocement |
SMms |
= |
Section modulus of ABS mild steel |
tfc |
= |
Thickness of ferrocement |
tms |
= |
Thickness of ABS mild steel |
M.R. |
= |
Modulus of Rupture of test sample (stress psi at which cracks
of 1.100" in width appear during the flexural test) |
"These guidelines and conversion methods were designed primarily as an aid to inexperienced builders and designers. They are simplified and usually result in conservative scantlings. We are prepared to accept alternative design procedures proposed by a designer provided that complete documentation of the procedures and subsequent design calculations are submitted in conjunction with the vessels plans.
"Strength calculations based on the results of the following procedures are to be submitted with the construction drawings to substantiate the adequacy of the hull strength (see Section 4 of ABS Guidelines and relevant Standards):
a) Compressive test"Regarding the machinery of the vessel all applicable plans required by the Rules are to be submitted for our review and approval.
b) Tensile test
c) Flexural test
d) Impact test
"Upon satisfactory completion of our review of plans, calculations and construction schedule, material testing and surveys, each vessel will be eligible to be classed * Al Fishing Service Annual Survey * AMS. The type of construction and description of the vessel will be noted in the Record."
The full set of ABS guidelines for the construction of ferrocement vessels would be available through the local ABS surveyor where the boat is to be built, or equivalent organisation which covers the area involved.
The full set of rules available would be too numerous to mention here; nevertheless, the above gives a fairly good idea as to what will be required.
The exact requirements of any one classification body may well differ from another, both in specific requirements and in cost of providing the survey and classification. Therefore, it is necessary to make contact on deciding whether or not to produce a boat to classification using the most up to date rules. It should be noted that the cost for building just the ferrocement element to rules for one vessel may well prove prohibitive.
For a guide to ferrocement fishing boat scantlings refer to Table 2, which indicates from practical experience the likely scantlings required in the upright method of construction.
Table 1
A Guide to Ferrocement Fishing Boat
Scantlings
Length metres |
Hull & deck minimum thickness |
Welded mesh reinforcement |
Reinforcing rods |
Web Depth Thickness |
||||||
gauge |
size |
No of layers |
longitudinal |
transverse |
||||||
|
mm |
|
mm |
|
dia |
space |
dia |
space |
mm |
mm |
10 |
30 |
19 |
13x13 |
6 |
6 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
100 |
25 |
12 |
30 |
19 |
13x13 |
6 |
6 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
100 |
25 |
14 |
30 |
19 |
13x13 |
6 |
6 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
100 |
25 |
16 |
30 |
19 |
13x13 |
6 |
6 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
125 |
30 |
18 |
32 |
19 |
13x13 |
7 |
8 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
150 |
30 |
20 |
32 |
19 |
13x13 |
7 |
8 |
50 |
6 |
50-75 |
150 |
30 |
Frame Spacing: |
Will be in the range of 600-700 mm for the upright
construction technique. |
Wire Mesh: |
Mesh can be of varied type of 22-18 gauge, providing the steel
content is maintained in line with that shown in the table above. |
Rod Reinforcement: |
The distribution and diameter of the rods may well vary in
other forms of construction technique, eg: upside down and moulded
methods. |
Longitudinal Webs: |
These will always be required in ferrocement deck
construction, as well as in hulls above 15 metres in length. |