The bottom trawl used is a shrimp-cum-fish trawl (see Annex 1) and it may not be as efficient for shrimp as specially designed shrimp-trawls.
Colombia
The records of all the fishing stations are shown in Annex 2.
In the 23 bottom trawl hauls made, the catches are distributed, expressed as number of hauls by catch size groups, as follows:
|
Catch group (tonnes/hour) : |
0-.03 |
.03-.1 |
.1-.3 |
.3-1 |
> 1 |
|
No of catches |
3 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
Panama
The records of all the fishing stations made are shown in Annex 3. As during the previous survey the catches in the bottom trawl are mainly dominated by low-value species. The bottom trawl catches were distributed as follows, expessed as number of hauls by catch groups:
|
Range (tonnes/Hour) |
: |
0-.1 |
.1-.3 |
.3-1 |
1-3 |
3-10 |
> 10 |
|
Gulf of Panama, shelf |
: |
4 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
|
Gulf of Panama, slope |
: |
|
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
West of Panama Gulf |
: |
2 |
8 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Cabezon (Heterocarpus vicarius) |
: |
7, |
425 |
and |
1922 |
|
Fidel (Solenocera agassizii) |
: |
19, |
29, |
37 |
and 68 |
Costa Rica
Annex 4 shows a record of the stations made in Costa Rican waters. As the work permit did not allow bottom trawling in depths less than 100 m, only a few stations could be worked out. Most of the Costa Rican shelf slopes steeply into the deep sea from about 120 m bottom depths and the shelfe-edge proved to be too rough for trawling in most locations.