Hydrography
The general tendency was that the surface layer was about 1-2°C warmer and the thermocline was not as distinct as in June-July. The salinity in the upper layer was also higher (0.1 - 0.2 ). The oxygen content was similar for the sections I-VI (Figs. 3-8) as observed in June-July, but for sections VII and VIII (Figs. 9, 10) the oxygen content was up to 2 ml/I higher this time. An oxygen minimum (2.5 ml/1) was observed at 200 m in section IV (Fig. 6) in June-July; now this minimum was 3.5 ml/I. The oxygen content for the water column 5-500 m was above 2.4 ml/1. The oxygen content observed in this water column has probably no limiting effect on the fish distribution.
Acoustic survey
The abundance of fish as observed from acoustic data was rather low (Fig. 11).
The fish biomass observed acoustically was estimated to about 100 000 tons. This was done by integrating the different areas within the isolines (Fig. 11) and multiply these areas by the intermediate integrator deflection value, 0.5, 5, 15 and the observed value of the areas above 20 mm was 25 mm. This was raised to a biomass estimate by applying the value:
1 mm integrator deflection = 13.6 tons/square nautical mileBy applying the same method for the observations in June-July the biomass was estimated to about 300 000 tons. In June/July the integrator values were splitted in different density groups than in November. The lowest acoustical density applied in the figure demonstrating the fish distribution as integrator deflections for June-July was 1-10 mm. This area contributed to about 95% of the total area where fish were observed acoutically. The arithmetic mean of the observed acoustical values within this area was 2.2 mm, not 5 mm as applied in the estimate giving about 300 000 tons. By applying the lower value the estimate was reduced to about 145 000 tons. This is probably a more correct estimate than the first one.
The fish biomass estimates for the two periods are probably too low due to the following facts:
- A rather big proportion of the coastal area is too shallow for Dr. Fridtjof Nansen to enterAimed pelagic trawl hauls for identification of pelagic scattering layers resulted mainly in fish larvae (mainly Engraulidae, 4-6 cm) and Mycthophids.
- Fish either close to bottom or to the surface are not observed by the acoustic equipment
- Noise from the steaming vessel will scare some of the fish away and thereby dilute the fish concentrations available for the acoustic equipment
Some surface schools were observed by eye in the Mafia region, the Zanzibar Channel, along the east coast of Zanzibar, and quite many in the shallow area northeast of Tanga.
Demersal trawl hauls in shallow waters
The trawl hauls reflected a similar species composition as in June-July. The average catch rates was less than oh the first survey. As demonstrated in Table 1 the reduction in the Zanzibar Channel was about 30%, in the Mafia Region about 40% and in the area south of 8 °S the reduction was about 70%.
Table 1 The average catch rates for demersal trawl hauls (depth 100m) in different regions during June-July and November 1982.
N = number of trawl hauls
C = catch per trawl hour (kg)
|
Zanzibar channel |
Mafia region |
South of 8° S |
|||
|
N |
C |
N |
C |
N |
C |
June/July |
26 |
296 |
9 |
650 |
8 |
918 |
November |
33 |
194 |
9 |
372 |
7 |
288 |
About 3% of the demersal trawl hauls gave catches above 1000 kg per hour, while about 22% of the hauls gave catches below 50 kg per hour. The best catch (1730 kg per hour) was made west of Latham Island (st.no. 292 Fig. 1) at about 140 m depth. The main species were Pristipomoides filamentosus and P. sindensis. The individual weights were 1-4.5 kg.
The dominating families in the catches were Leiognathidae, Mullidae, Carangida, Clupeidae and Lutjanidae. In the Zanzibar Channel the dominating species were small fish as Leiognathus leuciscus, L. bindus, Gazza minuta, Secutor insidiator, Gerres spp and different Mullidae. In the central part of the Channel catches of 200-300 kg per hour of damselfish (Teixeirichthys jordani) were made. This is also a small fish with a length range in the catches of 5 - 10 cm.
In the Mafia region the dominating species were similar as in the Zanzibar Channel except for the damselfish.
In the southern area the dominating species were bigger fish as Scombroides commersonianus and Epinephelus sp. In this area the largest catch was caught at st.269 (19 m). The main species in this catch of about 900 kg per hour were Sardinella albella and Leiognathus fasciatus.
Demersal trawl hauls in deeper waters
Due to earlier observations that little fish were in deeper water, just 18 trawl hauls were made in waters deeper than 150 m. The average catch rates were about 100 kg per hour (2-560 kg per hour). The dominating species at st.300 (Fig. 1) which gave 560 kg per hour were Dasyatis sp. and Decapterus Kurroides. The last species dominated another catch, st.321. Other important species in this depth stratum Saurida undosquamis, S. tumbil, Choropthalmus agassizi shrimp and prawns. If big sharks and skates are excluded from the catches the catch rates were reduced by about 30%.
Comparing trawl hauls with the Mbegani training vessel Mafunzo
Four demersal trawl stations in the western part of the Zanzibar Channel (Stations 312 - 315) were worked by F/V Mafunzo and R/V Dr. Fridtjof Nansen. The depth of the trawl hauls ranged from 19 to 45 m. In this depth range with the actual species composition (small fish, Leiognathidae and Mullidae, etc.), it seems that F/V Mafunzo caught on average about twice as much as R/V Dr. Fridtjof Nansen. This is probably caused by the following facts: The Mafunzo trawl has no bobbins and operates further away from the vessel than the Dr. Fridtjof Nansen trawl. Having no bobbins, the Mafunzo trawl operates closer to the bottom. Besides, in shallow waters Dr. Fridtjof Nansen will scare away more fish than the much smaller vessel Mafunzo. Comparison of trawl hauls in deeper water was planned but could not be carried out because of technical problems onboard Mafunzo.
Fishing experiments with traps and longline
Three longline and 13 trap stations were made The bait was mainly squid, but small fish was used in some of the traps. No obvious difference in catch according to bait was observed. The fish trap which is collapsible is shown in Fig.12.
At St.No.276 large fish, such as Epinephelus malabaricus (76 cm/6.3 kg) and Lutjanus coccineus (62 cm/3.5 kg, 74 cm/5.4 kg) were caught in the traps. Usually smaller fish were caught.
It may be concluded that the traps and the longline will fish rather well if placed in proper areas.
Figure 12. The collapsible fish trap made of an upper aluminium frame with floats and a bottom iron frame. The size: 130 × 45 × 45 cm.