The last day was used to frame and structure the identified groups of constraints and solutions in a three-phase model, i.e. the Initial Phase, the Intermediate Phase and Phase III. Whether such a division was necessary or useful was much debated. The group felt that such a process had a continuous character and that some activities would have to be repeated constantly, some would have to be done only once and others repeated until a certain level of will had been reached. It was also pointed out that even when such a level had been reached training and continuous upgrading would be needed to assure continuity of the process. The tables at the end of this chapter provide the complete plan, as discussed during the consultation.
In this regard the need for indicators was discussed. These indicators should provide the status of the decentralization process for the activities and the different areas of action. They also should assist in identifying whether the fisherfolks group or the government entity would be ready to implement the next step or phase.
Lastly, the group worked on the general statement capping these proceedings.
PHASE I: INITIAL STAGE |
||
ACTIONS |
CONSTRAINTS |
ACTIVITIES (Solutions) |
Organization |
||
Define/describe communities Meet & bring people together Activity planning |
Heterogeneous composition of people |
Respect/recognize differences Use existing governance structures where appropriate Observe gender sensitivity Use simple language Use national/official language or local dialect (if needed) Ensure and support participation of relevant stakeholders Find common ground |
Lack of trained personnel to define communities |
Provide assistance for training Ask assistance for training Ask proper agency/organization for assistance Facilitate trainers training |
|
Lack of political will at community level |
Identify key person(s)/leader(s) with access to the group Try to convince key person/leader Key person/leader has to convene the community |
|
Lack/scarcity of skilled leader (inappropriate type & style) |
Community has exclusive responsibility & should elect a different
leader |
|
Lack of formal education/skills/knowledge |
Assist in basic education |
|
Low cohesiveness |
Socialization events Initiate community projects |
|
Mobility between sectors/regions |
Identify movement patterns |
|
Lack of confidence |
Socialization events |
|
Lack of awareness |
Information drives through media (TV, radio, poster, fliers, etc) |
|
Difficulty in internal communication |
Channelling communication through key persons (religious, local leaders,
community elders) |
|
Contents |
||
Collect baseline information Identify stake-holders needs Identify constraints/limitations Identify opportunities, incentives & options for management Build upon traditional knowledge |
Lack of manpower |
Identification of village-based facilitators to be employed and trained by local government and community groups Government commitment to employ, train and post required staff to each
location |
Lack of logistics at various levels (e.g. organization, transport, finance,
basic amenities) |
Prioritization of requirement should be promoted by community in consultation with concerned agencies. Planning, programming and budgeting must be strongly committed Involvement of NGOs, IOs and other interested organizations (local governments,
fisherfolk, fishermens groups) to facilitate the process of decentralized
fisheries management (DFM) |
|
Lack of identification of required information |
Development of guidelines (information required, collecting methods)
by government agencies and community for the use of governments and communities |
|
Social insensitivity of some scientists |
Multidisciplinary approach (national and international levels) Promoting exposure to local conditions |
|
Poor awareness/responsibility on the part of stakeholders |
Provide sufficient incentives to encourage responsible management by
concerned agencies |
|
Lack of recognition/integration for indigenous/traditional/local knowledge |
Include indigenous/traditional/local knowledge in training and education
as well as in the guidelines for community-based natural resource management
from local to national levels |
|
Reluctance to share indigenous/traditional/local knowledge |
Demonstrate the benefits of improving communication and information exchange
(e.g. through exhibition) among all sectors by local governments, community
groups, academics and NGOs |
|
Problem of size (geographical, people, etc) |
Work with community to devise workable solution by the local governments
and community groups involved |
|
Lack of livelihood ideas/opportunities/skills |
Work with several agencies to identify options |
|
Lack of methodology |
Develop through pilot activities and prepare guidelines by concerned
agencies and/or donors |
|
Legal |
||
Identify/define rights & duties Recognize the legal system Provide legal assistance/support & enforcement |
Lack of appropriate legislative framework & legislation |
Study existing legislation Amend or initiate/make new legislation |
Lack of legal literacy/skills |
Prepare training material Organize training |
|
Lack of consultation mechanisms (legitimate or otherwise) |
Set up consultation mechanisms |
|
Misunderstandings of rights, duties and responsibilities |
Education |
|
Lack of recognition of customary law |
Incorporate relevant customary norms that reinforce community values,
sustainability and equitable distribution into decision making |
|
Unavailability of customary law |
Compile customary laws |
|
Too broad/ill-defined fisheries policy leading to conflicting interpretation |
Clarify and streamline policies Educate |
|
Inadequate enforcement mechanisms |
Establish & promote information provision Establish & promote consultation Establish & promote clear penal provisions Establish & promote principle of fairness |
|
Process |
||
Maintaining cooperative spirit Facilitate conflict resolution Communicate & facilitate, translating & listening, transfer/exchange
of knowledge |
Lack of facilitation skills/few facilitators |
Provision of training for trainers |
Lack of common understanding (due to different concepts) |
Develop glossary Communicate, discuss, interact |
|
Lack of common language |
Select the trainers knowledgeable in the local language Consider using interpreters |
|
Poor compliance with rules/norms |
Identify underlying reasons for non-compliance and take necessary action,
e.g. promote awareness and strengthen enforcement of rules and regulations |
|
Lack of community participation in formulating rules and regulations |
Ensure full participation of community in formulating rules |
|
Too many provocateurs |
Recommend involvement of provocateurs in the whole process |
|
Lack of flexibility |
Facilitate regular review of the process (negotiation, collaboration,
etc) |
|
Inability to accept limitation |
Provide clear understanding of the issues of the process from the beginning |
|
Lack of accountability |
Create accountability mechanisms Transparent mechanisms |
|
Lack of courage to act despite the limitations |
Provide authority and responsibility to the community leader to act despite
the limitations |
|
Training |
||
Training on |
Lack of trained personnel, |
Trainer capacity building |
Lack of logistics |
Provide finance Provide facilities Be flexible in using local facilities |
|
Lack of trainers training |
Provide training course for trainers |
|
Size [geographical, people] |
Scaling by appropriate sub-grouping |
|
Lack of curriculum |
Develop more practical and comprehensive courses |
|
Communication gaps |
Develop linkage between relevant parties through collaboration and cooperation
by meetings, workshops, publishing |
|
Insufficient integration of local knowledge into the training programme |
Identify and incorporate local knowledge and skills into the training
programme |
|
Lack of community participation in the design of training |
Motivate, participatory involvement of relevant communities in training design Enable community members to participate, e.g. by providing some financial support Get assistance from religious or informal leaders |
|
Low acceptance of new concepts |
Motivating, teaching, explaining to the stakeholders regarding the benefits
of the new concept |
|
Insufficient examples/indicators/templates |
Giving examples from other successful projects |
|
Cultural, religious, social and economic differences within target groups |
Identify and determine the best solution acceptable to the groups |
|
Insufficient training needs assessment |
Provide more socioeconomic survey regarding the actual situation of the
people |
|
Lack of training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
Set up and appraise the training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
|
Lack of field experience of trainees |
Provide more incentive and/or collaboration between trainers/trainees
and local community |
|
Lack of continuity and sustained training |
Set up series of training and follow-up programmes |
|
Support |
||
Identify political responsibility & authority Create & enhance political (incl. financial) support Political empowerment Providing enforcement assistance |
Lack of or a change in political will, national, local |
Advocate at national and local levels Create power base at local level |
Lack of a clear policy/legislation |
Create database/information in order to update/review of policy/legislation Make proposal based on participatory approach of stakeholders Make new legislation accommodating the needs and requirements in the
CCRF |
|
Lack of administrative/structure support at various levels |
Enhance/improve awareness of administrators Create self-help mechanism |
|
Lack of general supports (e.g. human, financial, facility, etc) |
Promote systems and build capacity of lean management Create support mechanisms for marketing, credit and social security and safety Create examples of best management experience from pilot cases Promote educational role of community members in enforcement |
|
Limited access to formal and informal political linkage/circle |
Educate community members to vote strategically Improvement of participation of informal leaders |
|
Lack of involvement of community in decision-making process |
Convincing by doing Involve community at all stages of activities |
|
Lack of influential person to promote the process |
Identify such an individual and convince him/her in selling idea |
|
Insufficient level of readiness |
Develop medium/long-term plans/vision Keep informed/establish line of communication |
|
Lack of sustainability/durability/continuity of support |
Impress with internal success cases |
PHASE II |
||
ACTIONS |
CONSTRAINTS |
ACTIVITIES (Solutions) |
Organization |
||
Define/describe communities Meet & bring people together Organizing the community Establish/strengthen the organizational structure Collaboration among fisherfolk /community (networking) Activity planning |
Heterogeneous composition of people |
Respect/recognize these differences Use existing governance structures where appropriate Observe gender sensitivity Use simple language Use national/official language or local dialect (if needed) Ensure and support participation of relevant stakeholders Find common ground |
Lack of trained personnel to define communities |
Ask assistance for training Facilitate trainers training Provide assistance for training |
|
Lack of political will at community level |
Try to convince key person/leader Key person/leader has to convene the community |
|
Lack/scarcity of skilled leader (inappropriate type & style) |
Community has exclusive responsibility & should elect a different
leader |
|
Lack of formal education/skills/knowledge |
Assist in basic education Initiate basic education |
|
Size of community (too large) |
Efficient/appropriate sub-grouping |
|
Low cohesiveness |
Socialization events Initiate community projects |
|
Mobility between sectors/regions |
Identify movement pattern Convene individuals and initiate grouping process |
|
Lack of confidence |
Socialization events Initiate community projects |
|
Lack of awareness |
Information drives through media (TV, radio, poster, fliers, etc) Information drives through extension staff/key persons |
|
Difficulty in internal communication |
Channelling communication through key persons (religious leaders, local
leaders, community elders) |
|
Malfunction of marketing system |
Give marketing training Include the hindering community members (middlemen) into your marketing
approach and ask for their assistance |
|
High dependence on middlemen (organization conflicts with interest of
the middlemen) |
Consider including the hindering community members (middlemen) into your marketing approach and ask for their assistance Promote rural credit programme Help establish auction market |
|
Contents |
||
Identify stakeholders needs Identify constraints/limitations Identify opportunities, incentives & options for management Build upon traditional knowledge Explore alternative livelihood |
Lack of manpower |
Identification of village-based facilitators to be employed and trained by local government and community groups Government commitment to employ, train and post required staff to each
location |
Lack of logistics at various levels (e.g. organization, transport, finance,
basic amenities) |
Prioritization of requirement should be promoted by community in consultation with concerned agencies Planning, programming and budgeting must be strongly committed Involvement of NGOs, IOs and other interested organizations (local governments,
fisherfolk, fishermens groups) to facilitate the process of decentralized
fisheries management (DFM) |
|
Lack of identification of required information |
Development of guidelines (information required, collecting methods)
by government agencies and community for the use of governments and community |
|
Social insensitivity of some scientists |
Multidisciplinary approach (national and international levels) Stronger inputs from community in research and development Promoting exposure to local conditions |
|
Poor awareness/responsibility on the part of stakeholders |
Design better extension and education programmes targeting unaware stakeholders by national and local governments with support from NGOs, donors, etc Provide sufficient incentives to encourage responsible management by
concerned agencies |
|
Lack of recognition/integration for indigenous/traditional/local knowledge |
Include indigenous/traditional/local knowledge in training and education
as well as in the guidelines for community-based natural resource management
from local to national levels |
|
Reluctance to share indigenous/traditional/local knowledge |
Demonstrate benefits of improving communication and information exchange
(e.g. through exhibition) among all sectors by local government, community
groups, academics and NGOs |
|
Unavailability of published or unpublished data |
Improve communication and information exchange within and among all sectors |
|
Problem of size (geographical, people, etc) |
Work with community to devise workable solution by local governments
and community groups involved |
|
Lack of livelihood ideas/opportunities/skills |
Work with several agencies to identify options |
|
Lack of methodology |
Develop through pilot activities and prepare guidelines by concerned
agencies and/or donors |
|
Legal |
||
Provide legal assistance/support & enforcement Legal empowerment (e.g. legitimizing norms, customs) |
Lack of appropriate legislative framework & legislation |
Study existing legislation Amend or initiate/make new legislation |
Lack of legal literacy/skills - manpower/operationally/intellectually/substantively |
Organize training |
|
Lack of consultation mechanisms (legitimate or otherwise) |
Set up consultation mechanisms |
|
Misunderstandings of rights, duties and responsibilities |
Educate |
|
Lack of recognition of customary law |
Incorporate relevant customary norms that reinforce community values,
sustainability and equitable distribution into decision making |
|
Unavailability of customary law |
Compile customary laws |
|
Too broad/ill-defined fisheries policy leading to conflicting interpretation |
Clarify and streamline policies Educate |
|
Lack of independent dispute settlement system |
Seek out and inform community about additional legislative tools Use public pressure to settle disputes |
|
Lack of appropriate dispute settlement system, intra-community, inter-community,
government |
Set up dispute management mechanisms |
|
Inadequate enforcement mechanisms |
Strengthen enforcement mechanisms through arrangements that enjoy full legitimacy Promote community-based enforcement strategies Establish & promote social sanctions Establish & promote information provision Establish & promote consultation Establish & promote clear penal provisions Establish & promote principle of fairness |
|
Support |
||
Identify political responsibility & authority Create & enhance political (incl. financial) support Political empowerment Providing enforcement assistance |
Lack of or a change in political will, national, local |
Advocate at national and local levels Create constituency at local level |
Lack of a clear policy/legislation |
Create database/information in order to update/review of policy/legislation Make proposal based on participatory approach of stakeholders Make new legislation accommodating the needs and requirements in the CCRF Clarify policy through media |
|
Lack of administrative/structure support at various levels |
Enhance/improve awareness of administrators Create self-help mechanism |
|
Lack of general support (e.g. human, financial, facility, etc.) |
Promote systems and build capacity of lean management Encourage self-financing scheme Create support mechanisms for marketing, credit and social security and safety Create examples of best management experience from pilot cases Promote educational role of community members in enforcement |
|
Limited access to formal and informal political linkage/circle |
Encourage local community members to be elected into the formal political system Educate community members to vote strategically Improvement of participation of informal leaders |
|
Lack of involvement of community in the decision-making process |
Convince by doing Involve community in all stages of activities |
|
Insufficient level of readiness |
Develop medium/long-term plans/vision Keep informed/establish line of communication |
|
Lack of sustainability/durability/ continuity of support |
Provide medium/long-term plan to supporting agency Impress with internal success cases |
|
Training |
||
Training on |
Lack of trainers |
Trainer capacity building |
Lack of logistics: |
Provide finance Provide facilities Be flexible in using local facilities |
|
Lack of trainers training |
Provide training course for trainers |
|
Lack of curriculum |
Develop more practical and comprehensive courses |
|
Communication gaps |
Develop linkage between relevant parties through collaboration and cooperation
by meeting, workshop, publishing |
|
Insufficient integration of local knowledge into training programme |
Identify and incorporate local knowledge and skills into the training
programme |
|
Lack of community participation in training design |
Motivate, participatory involvement of relevant communities in training design Enable community members to participate e.g. by providing some financial support Get assistance from religious or informal leaders |
|
Low acceptance of new concepts |
Motivating, teaching, explaining to the stakeholders regarding the benefits
of the new concept |
|
Insufficient examples/ indicators/templates |
Giving examples from other successful projects |
|
Cultural, religious, social and economic differences within target groups |
Identify and determine the best solution acceptable to the groups |
|
Insufficient training needs assessment |
Provide more detailed socioeconomic survey regarding the actual situation
of the people |
|
Lack of training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
Set up and appraise the training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
|
Lack of field experience of trainees |
Provide more incentive and/or collaboration between trainers/trainees
and local community |
|
Lack of continuity and sustained training |
Set up a series of training and follow up programmes |
|
Process |
||
Maintaining cooperative spirit Facilitate conflict resolution Communicate & facilitate, translating & listening, transfer/
exchange of knowledge |
Lack of facilitation skills/few facilitators |
Provision of training for trainers |
Lack of common understanding (due to different concepts) |
Communicate, discuss, interact |
|
Lack of common language |
Consider using interpreters |
|
Lack of progressive sanctions |
Formulation of appropriate sanctions of rules and regulations |
|
Lack of effective sanctions/rules |
Provision of sustainable monitoring of sanctions implemented |
|
Poor compliance with rules/norms |
Identify underlying reasons for non-compliance and take necessary action,
e.g. promote awareness and strengthen enforcement of rules and regulations |
|
Lack of community participation in formulating rules and regulations |
Ensure full participation of the community in formulating rules |
|
Too many provocateurs |
Recommend involvement of provocateurs in the whole process |
|
Lack of flexibility |
Facilitate regular review of the process (negotiation, collaboration,
etc) |
|
Inability to accept limitation |
Provide clear understanding of the issues of the process from the beginning
|
|
Lack of accountability |
Create accountability mechanisms Transparent mechanisms |
|
Lack of courage to act despite the limitations |
Provide authority and responsibility to the community leader to act despite
the limitations |
PHASE III |
||
ACTIONS |
CONSTRAINTS |
ACTIVITIES (Solutions) |
Organization |
||
Organizing the community Establish/ strengthen the organizational structure Collaboration among fisherfolk/ community (networking) Activity planning |
Heterogeneous composition of people |
Respect/recognize these differences Use existing governance structures where appropriate Observe gender sensitivity Use simple language Use national/official language or local dialect (if needed) Ensure and support participation of relevant stakeholders Find common ground |
Lack of trained personnel to define communities |
Provide assistance for training Ask assistance for training Facilitate trainers training |
|
Lack of political will at community level |
Try to convince key person/ leader Key person/leader has to convene the community |
|
Lack/scarcity of skilled leader (inappropriate type & style) |
Community has exclusive responsibility & should elect a different
leader |
|
Lack of formal education/skills/ knowledge |
Assist in basic education Initiate basic education |
|
Size of community (too large) |
Efficient/appropriate sub-grouping |
|
Low cohesiveness |
Socialization events Initiate community projects |
|
Mobility between sectors/ regions |
Convene individuals and initiate grouping process |
|
Lack of confidence |
Socialization events Initiate community projects |
|
Lack of awareness |
Information drives through media (TV, radio, poster, fliers, etc) Information drives through extension staff/key persons |
|
Difficulty in internal communication |
Channelling communication through key persons (religious leaders, local
leaders, community elders) |
|
Malfunction of marketing system |
Give marketing training Include the hindering community members (middlemen) into your marketing
approach and ask for their assistance |
|
High dependence on middlemen (organization conflicts with the interest
of the middlemen) |
Consider including the hindering community members (middlemen) into your marketing approach and ask for their assistance Promote rural credit programme Help establish auction market |
|
Contents |
||
Initiate management planning process |
Lack of manpower |
Government commitment to employ, train and post required staff to each location Curriculum development (in consultation with line agencies, donors, etc)
should respond to changing human resource needs |
Lack of logistics at various levels (e.g. organization, transport, finance,
basic amenities) |
Prioritization of requirement should be promoted by community in consultation with concerned agencies Planning, programming and budgeting must be strongly committed Involvement of NGOs, IOs and other interested organizations (local governments,
fisherfolk, fishermens groups) to facilitate the process of decentralized
fisheries management (DFM) |
|
Lack of identification of required information |
Development of guidelines (information required, collecting methods)
by government agencies and community for the use of governments and community |
|
Social insensitivity of some scientists |
Multidisciplinary approach (national and international levels) Stronger inputs from community in research and development Promoting exposure to local conditions |
|
Poor awareness/responsibility on part of stakeholders |
Design better extension and education programmes targeting unaware stakeholders by national and local governments with support from NGOs, donors, etc Provide sufficient incentives to encourage responsible management by
concerned agencies |
|
Lack of recognition/integration for indigenous/traditional/local knowledge |
Include indigenous/traditional/ local knowledge in training and education
as well as in the guidelines for community-based natural resource management
from local to national levels |
|
Reluctance to share indigenous/ traditional/local knowledge |
Demonstrate benefits of improving communication and information exchange
(e.g. through exhibition) among all sectors by local government, community
groups, academics and NGOs |
|
Unavailability of published or unpublished data |
Improve communication and information exchange within and among all sectors Create local library/information centre Provide incentive to publish data |
|
Lack of livelihood ideas/ opportunities/skills |
Consider institutional reforms Information exchange by all concerned |
|
Lack of methodology |
Develop through pilot activities and prepare guidelines by concerned
agencies and/or donors |
|
Legal |
||
Provide legal assistance/ support & enforcement Legal empowerment (e.g. legitimizing norms, customs) |
Lack of appropriate legislative framework & legislation |
Study existing legislation Amend or initiate/make new legislation |
Lack of legal literacy/skills |
Organize training |
|
Lack of consultation mechanisms (legitimate or otherwise) |
Set up consultation mechanisms |
|
Misunderstandings of rights, duties and responsibilities |
Education |
|
Too broad/ill-defined fisheries policy leading to conflicting interpretation |
Clarify and streamline policies Educate |
|
Lack of independent dispute settlement system |
Seek out and inform community about additional legislative tools Use public pressure to settle disputes |
|
Lack of appropriate dispute settlement system intra-community, inter-community,
government |
Set up dispute management mechanisms |
|
Inadequate enforcement mechanisms |
Strengthen enforcement mechanisms through arrangements that enjoy full legitimacy Promote community-based enforcement strategies Establish & promote social sanctions Establish & promote information provision Establish & promote consultation Establish & promote clear penal provisions Establish & promote principle of fairness |
|
Support |
||
Identify political responsibility & authority Providing enforcement assistance |
Lack of or a change in political will |
Advocate at national and local levels Create constituency at local level |
Lack of a clear policy/legislation |
Create database/information in order to update/review of policy/legislation Make proposal based on participatory approach of stakeholders Make new legislation accommodating the needs and requirements in the CCRF Clarify policy through media |
|
Lack of administrative/structure support at various levels |
Enhance/improve awareness of administrators Create self-help mechanism |
|
Lack of general supports (e.g. human, financial, facility, etc) |
Promote systems and build capacity of lean management Encourage self-financing scheme Create support mechanisms for marketing, credit and social security and safety Create examples of best management experience from pilot cases Promote educational role of community members in enforcement |
|
Limited access to formal and informal political linkage/circle |
Encourage local community members to be elected into the formal political system Educate community members to vote strategically Improvement of participation of informal leaders |
|
Lack of involvement of community in the decision-making process |
Convincing by doing Involve community at all stages of activities |
|
Insufficient level of readiness |
Develop medium/long-term plans/vision Keep informed/ establish line of communication |
|
Lack of sustainability/durability/ continuity of support |
Provide medium/long-term plan to supporting agency Develop a phased change-over plan Impress with internal success cases |
|
Training |
||
Training on |
Lack of trainers, manpower, quality |
Trainer capacity building |
Lack of trainers training |
Provide training course for trainers |
|
Size [geographical, people] |
Scaling by appropriate sub-grouping |
|
Lack of curriculum |
Develop more practical and comprehensive courses |
|
Communication gaps, between groups, between local agencies |
Develop linkage between relevant parties through collaboration and cooperation
by meeting, workshop, publishing |
|
Lack of community participation in training design |
Motivate, participatory involvement of relevant communities in training design Enable community members to participate, e.g. by providing some financial
support |
|
Low acceptance of new concepts |
Motivating, teaching, explaining to the stakeholders regarding the benefits
of the new concept |
|
Insufficient examples/indicators/templates |
Giving examples from other successful projects |
|
Insufficient training needs assessment |
Provide more social-economic survey regarding the actual situation of
the people |
|
Lack of training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
Set up and appraise the training evaluation and feedback mechanism |
|
Lack of field experience of trainees |
Provide more incentive and/or collaboration between trainers/ trainees
and local community |
|
Lack of continuity and sustained training |
Set up series of training and follow up programmes |
|
Process |
||
Maintaining cooperative spirit Facilitate conflict resolution Communicate & facilitate Translating & listening Transfer/ exchange of knowledge |
Lack of facilitation skills/few facilitators |
Provision of training for trainers |
Lack of common understanding (due to different concepts) |
Communicate, discuss, interact |
|
Lack of common language |
Consider using interpreters |
|
Lack of progressive sanctions |
Formulate appropriate sanctions of rules and regulations |
|
Lack of effective sanctions/rules |
Provide sustainable monitoring of sanctions implemented |
|
Poor compliance with rules/norms |
Identify underlying reasons for non-compliance and take necessary actions,
e.g. promote awareness and strengthen enforcement of rules and regulations
|
|
Lack of community participation in formulating rules and regulations |
Ensure full participation of community in formulating rules |
|
Too many provocateurs |
Recommend involvement of provocateurs in the whole process |
|
Lack of flexibility |
Facilitate regular review of the process (negotiation, collaboration,
etc) |
|
Inability to accept limitation |
Provide clear understanding of the issues of the process from the beginning
|
|
Lack of accountability |
Transparent mechanisms |
|
Lack of courage to act despite the limitations |
Provide authority and responsibility to the community leader to act despite
the limitations |