No Thumbnail Available

River Fisheries










Welcomme, R.L.River Fisheries.FAO Fisheries Technical Paper.No.262. Rome. FAO. 1985. 330p.


Also available in:

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Synopsis of biological data on the tor mahseer Tor tor (Hamilton, 1822). 2003
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Among Indian mahseers, Tor mahseer Tor tor (Hamilton, 1822) is the most important food and game fish of India after Tor putitora (Hamilton, 1822). It constitutes an outstanding fishery in the Narmada River in central India. It has also settled in some Indian reservoirs which have been stocked with this fish. However, the building of dams across certain rivers has created reservoirs that have destroyed the natural breeding grounds of the fish and caused mortality of brood and juvenile fish indisc riminately. The mahseer fishery of India is further declining as a result of low recruitment of the fish. Stocking rivers and reservoirs with mahseer is therefore essential to restore the fishery. This synopsis is the compilation of biological data for Tor tor – Tor mahseer collected from different sources. The detailed biological information on Tor tor, including the feeding habits, breeding and growth patterns contained in this synopsis, will be useful in planning the development of the mahsee r fishery in India.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Consequences of biomanipulation for fish and fisheries 2001
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The main goal of biomanipulation by fish reduction is not a change in the fish community but a change in the aquatic ecosystem. Fish reduction is a method to push the system in another state, usually a shift from algae domination to macrophyte domination. Intensive fish removal is done by one of the following methods: seining (the Netherlands, Germany, UK), trawling (Sweden, Finland), use of rotenone (Norway, USA, Poland) and stocking of piscivorous fish (USA, Germany). If circumstances allow it (reservoir, ponds) draining is combined with seining (the Netherlands, UK, Poland). The intensity and duration of fishing differs per case, but is quite important for the way the system changes. Fishing may be combined with stocking of predatory fish, mainly pike and pikeperch (or walleye)......
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    The decrease in aquatic vegetation in Europe and its consequences for fish populations (1987) 1987
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    A diverse aquatic vegetation is essential to maintain a diverse fish fauna. The fish is an important part of a complex network of relations between nutrients, phytoplankton, epiphytes, herbivorous invertebrates, the aquatic vegetation and fish. In Northwest Europe and North America and probably in the rest of the industrialized world, the (submersed) aquatic vegetation (macrophytes) is rapidly disappearing from eutrophicated waters. The decrease is well documented. As a consequence of abun dant growth of epiphytes, which are better competitors for inorganic carbon and light in highly eutrophicated waters than submersed aquatic macrophytes are, the condition of the aquatic vegetation becomes worse. Shallow, eutrophic, relatively clear water that is rich in water plants, can change to phytoplankton dominated turbid water, within short time. This change may occur without a remarkable increase in the actual nutrient loading. Invertebrate grazers like snails, macrocrustaceans and cl adoceran zooplankters are able to protect aquatic macrophytes against the negative effects of this competition by removing epiphytes and phytoplanktonic algae. As a man predator on invertebrates, the fish indirectly influences the well-being of the aquatic vegetation. There is evidence that aquatic macrophytes are the source of biochemical compounds that negatively affect the growth of algae (allelopathy) and attract grazers. These processes are mainly found in model systems and under semi-na tural conditions. Their ecological significance still has to be tested in the field.A situation with turbid, phytoplankton dominated, water without aquatic vegetation can continue after removing nutrients from effluents because: (i) blue-green algae (phytoplankters) may excrete toxic substances, negatively affecting the growth of aquatic macrophytes; (ii) abundantly occurring young fish, but also invertebrate animals like mysids, prey on the bigger (phytoplankton grazing) cladocerans; (iii) acid rain, polluted bottom sediments and/or bird flocks contribute to the nutrient loading of a water body. Restoration techniques are: lowering the nutrient loading in combination with protection of the remaining stands of reed, replanting of aquatic plants, creation of artificial refugia for zooplankton and manipulation of young-of-the-year fish populations. Chemical and mechanical control of "nuisance" growth and heavy stocking with herbivorous fish including the common carp (Cyprinus carpi o) have to be omitted or executed very carefully to avoid phytoplankton-dominated turbid water. In small systems with "nuisance" growth, stocking (50-150 kg/ha, max. 250 kg/ha) with grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) can improve the water quality.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.