Thumbnail Image

Briefing note: Transparency- Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) and Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)









Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of adaptation training package and the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) 2021
    Also available in:

    This leaflet provides an overview of the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of Adaptation training package and how it might be used to help countries fulfill their reporting requirements related to the Paris Agreement's Enhanced Transparency Framework. This training package can be used to develop an M&E framework and system for reporting on climate change adaptation in the agriculture sectors. The training package contributes to SDG 13: "Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts".
  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    Mozambique: Improving monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity for reporting on climate change adaptation 2021
    Also available in:

    This case study from Mozambique highlights how a national M&E system for climate change can provide a foundation for meeting global reporting commitments without placing undue burden on countries. The case study focuses on capacity building activities for making the M&E system operational especially to support climate change reporting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Operational guidelines for the design, implementation and harmonization of monitoring and evaluation systems for climate-smart agriculture
    Operational guidelines for the design, implementation and harmonization of national-level monitoring and evaluation systems with a focus on alignment with the Paris Agreement, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk
    2019
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is recognized as critically important for tracking progress, whether it serves the purpose of accountability to donors, informs future improvements to CSA practices, or contributes to the aggregate global progress toward meeting the SDGs or the global stocktake under the Paris Agreement. There has been a growing chorus acknowledging the need to align the indicators and M&E frameworks of major donors with those of the three global agreements. Monitoring and reporting has begun on the SDGs, although the development of methodologies for various indicators is an evolving process. The development of specific indicators for the agriculture sector is also well underway for the Sendai Framework. The organizations conducting this work have recognized the need to streamline these processes. For example, they have already attempted to align several of the indicators between the SDGs and the Sendai Framework.These operational guidelines aim to address the core constraints and needs of FAO Member States on both the design and implementation of M&E systems that can simultaneously address CSA and sector reporting requirements for the 2030 Agenda, the Sendai Framework and the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. First and foremost, the guidelines acknowledge the principal need expressed by Member States that M&E systems and indicators be simple and not onerous. The challenges that have always existed with regard to M&E for CSA are still present, and are particularly pronounced for pillar 2, adaptation and resilience. These challenges to the development of indicators for pillar 2 have exhibited the greatest need for attention.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.