Thumbnail Image

Multi-sectoral study on the Agribusiness Venture Arrangement policy and implementation under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program

Year of publication 2016

Pages 124 p.

Author Peter J. Batt, Antonio L. Salvador, Hector D. Soliman, Gumercindo G. Tumbali, Darryl Vhugen

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Book (stand-alone)

ISBN 978-92-5-109452-5

Series number 1

Edition 1

Synopsis (short abstract) This study makes an assessment of the agribusiness venture arrangements (AVAs) between agribusiness firms and the agrarian reform beneficiaries, focusing on banana, cacao, oil palm and pineapple plantations in Mindanao. With both temporal and financial constraints, the study focused only on leasehold and contract growing arrangements which are the predominant modes of AVAs. As an approach, the study conducted a review of literature, interviewed key informants and conducted six focus group discus sions in Cagayan de Oro and Davao, where representatives of farmers groups, business investors and government/private stakeholders met separately to assess the state of their agribusiness arrangements. After analysing the outcomes of these FGDs, the study conducted a national workshop to report and to validate recommendations for the agribusiness sector. The study has revealed that while AVAs have been in existence in the Philippines for 26 years, there are still very few examples of successfu l agribusiness arrangements between ARBs and investor-companies. The study found out that most ARBs are not aware of their obligations and entitlements under their contracts, for most of these provisions are written in a language that they do not understand. Their lack of understanding is exacerbated by insufficient legal representation and transparency issues from their own cooperative leaders. The capacity of farmers’ organizations to run and operate their farms, make collective decisions, und erstand financial statements and enter into intelligent negotiations with regard to the terms and conditions of their agreements was also identified as a major shortcoming.

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Project
    Support to the Development of Multi-Country Programming Framework for the Pacific Islands (2023–2027) - TCP/SAP/3810 2025
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    In August 2021, during the 7th Pacific Heads of Agriculture and Forestry Services (HOAFS) meeting, the development of a Pacific Regional Agriculture and Forestry Strategy was endorsed. The Pacific Community (SPC) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were tasked with designing a process and foresight methodology for this strategy, to be presented at the 2022 Joint FAO and SPC Pacific Ministers of Agriculture and Forestry Meeting. Additionally, SPC and FAO were encouraged to support the region in adopting a strategic approach to transforming food systems and addressing climate change impacts on agriculture and forestry. With the FAO CPF for the Pacific Islands (2018–2022) and the UN Pacific Strategy (UNPS) expiring at the end of 2022, efforts were initiated to develop new frameworks for the next cycle. This work involved evaluations of the CPF and UNPS, alongside drafting the FAO Pre Common Country Analysis (Pre-CCA) and the UN Common Country Analysis for the Pacific Islands. Considering the complexities of the Pacific Subregion, with 14 small island nations and territories, coordination among development partners such as the SPC, United Nations and FAO is critical. At the project design stage, FAO aimed to actively participate in crafting the Pacific Regional Agriculture and Forestry Strategy and the Pacific UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (UNSDCF) 2023-2027, alongside its next CPF by the end of 2022.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Multi-sectoral platforms for planning and implementation
    How they might better serve forest and farm producers
    2014
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    Multi-sectoral platforms are processes which often become institutionalized bodies drawing together multiple stakeholder representatives from different sectors to make decisions. They are convened to harness the benefits of collaboration in tackling planning problems that span more than one sectoral jurisdiction and therefore require a co-ordinated response in policy formulation and implementation. Examples include platforms to address planning issues around climate change, food security, biodi versity conservation, timber legality and so on – many of which have nested processes from international level right down to local level. The improved participation, transparency and accountability they embody is seen as best practice in governance of forest and farm landscapes. They are often therefore invoked in the design or reform of policy processes that span multiple sectors. In addition, they are particularly useful when problems spill into more heated conflict, when power imbalances re quire redress, when broader consensus or innovation are needed and when there are significant collaborative efficiencies to be had in tackling problems of a substantial nature. Forest and Farm Facility Working Paper 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    A good practice on the Implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure A multi-actor and multi-sector approach in Sierra Leone 2016
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The Implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure in Sierra Leone has provided the opportunity to draw lessons and good practices in the country. These lessons are shared with other countries wishing to learn from successful experiences in the use of the Voluntary Guidelines to improve responsible governance of tenure.
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.