Thumbnail Image

Guiding principles for people's participation projects: design, operation, monitoring and ongoing evaluation






Also available in:

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Operational guidelines for the design, implementation and harmonization of monitoring and evaluation systems for climate-smart agriculture
    Operational guidelines for the design, implementation and harmonization of national-level monitoring and evaluation systems with a focus on alignment with the Paris Agreement, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk
    2019
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is recognized as critically important for tracking progress, whether it serves the purpose of accountability to donors, informs future improvements to CSA practices, or contributes to the aggregate global progress toward meeting the SDGs or the global stocktake under the Paris Agreement. There has been a growing chorus acknowledging the need to align the indicators and M&E frameworks of major donors with those of the three global agreements. Monitoring and reporting has begun on the SDGs, although the development of methodologies for various indicators is an evolving process. The development of specific indicators for the agriculture sector is also well underway for the Sendai Framework. The organizations conducting this work have recognized the need to streamline these processes. For example, they have already attempted to align several of the indicators between the SDGs and the Sendai Framework.These operational guidelines aim to address the core constraints and needs of FAO Member States on both the design and implementation of M&E systems that can simultaneously address CSA and sector reporting requirements for the 2030 Agenda, the Sendai Framework and the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. First and foremost, the guidelines acknowledge the principal need expressed by Member States that M&E systems and indicators be simple and not onerous. The challenges that have always existed with regard to M&E for CSA are still present, and are particularly pronounced for pillar 2, adaptation and resilience. These challenges to the development of indicators for pillar 2 have exhibited the greatest need for attention.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Project
    Evaluation of the site selected, design of project and proposed construction and operations of the Majuikan Tanjong Tualang Freshwater Aquaculture Centre, Malaysia 1980
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The Lembaga Kamajuan Ikan Malaysia (MAJUIKAN) proposed to establish a Freshwater Aquaculture Centre at Tanjong Tualang, Perak, Malaysia. The Centre is planned primarily to undertake aquaculture operation on a commercial scale. In conjunction with the Fisheries Department, Majuikan has identified three sites in the State of Perak for the project. The site at Tanjong Tualang was finally selected. This report presents the comments, suggestions and recommendations on the design for the proposed si te as made by Wan Mohamed and Khoo SDN BHD, the consulting engineers, to the Government of Malaysia as submitted to the Majuikan in March 1979 (Annex B). This task was made upon the request of the Government. On 1 August, the authors visited the Tanjong Tualang site with Mr. Toran Bin Ishak, State Majuikan Officer, Ipoh, and Mr. Thani, Majuikan official, Kuala Lumpur. The discussions were made at Majuikan office on 2 August 1979 in the presence of Mr. Sabri bin Ahmad, Director for Project Deve lopment of Majuikan, Mr. Bala Rajantharen, also for all of Majuikan, Mr. Chou Choong Keow, Director Mr. R. Santhanaraj, Associate Director of Wan Mohamed & Khoo SDN BHD.
  • Thumbnail Image

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.