Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentManagement Response: Mid-Term Evaluation of GCP/ZAM/059/BEL: Luapula Food Security, Nutrition Action and Communication Project 2006
Also available in:
No results found. -
DocumentEvaluation of Improving Household Food Security and Nutrition in the Luapula Valley Project (IHFSAN)
Report of the Evaluation Mission
2001Also available in:
No results found.High rates of chronic and acute malnutrition in Luapula valley were the starting point for the IHFSAN project. Causes of malnutrition in Luapula valley were identified as: i) household food insecurity; ii) poor health, water and sanitation; iii) poor knowledge base; and iv) inadequate care for the nutritionally vulnerable. This analysis was confirmed by a participatory rural appraisal carried out by FAO in 1996 in preparation for the project. The project started operations of its present phase i n 1997 and will conclude in December 2001. The original budget of US$ 3,314,000 was increased to US$ 3,651,035 following a tri-partite review in 1999; by mid-2001 US$ 3,037, 979 were spent. -
DocumentSupport to the Coordination Structure for Food Security Information System Activities of the SETSAN (UTF/MOZ/071/MOZ) Tripartite Evaluation Mission Final Report 2006
Also available in:
No results found.The Tripartite Evaluation (TE) of project “Support to the Co-ordinating Structure for Food Security Information System Activities of the Food Security and Nutrition Technical Secretariat (SETSAN), UTF/MOZ/071/MOZ” (referred to as UTF) was to “conduct an evaluation of the SETSAN and contribution of UTF project activities and achievements to date. As the project will be drawing to a close in 2007, the purpose of the evaluation will be to provide recommendations to all parties (Government, FAO and EC) on further steps necessary to consolidate progress and ensure achievement of objectives to the end of the project – as well as to guide the Government in its strategic longer term planning for the SETSAN”1. According to the standard FAO Evaluation Service guidelines, the evaluation would analyse as well the efficiency of project implementation, the efficacy, impact if any and sustainability of the results accomplished.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.