Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings: Evidence from Somalia

Valli, E.; Daidone, S.; Sitko, N.; Staffieri. I.;

Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings: Evidence from Somalia

Policy brief

Year of publication 2022

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 2p.

Author Valli, E.; Daidone, S.; Sitko, N.; Staffieri. I.;

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Policy brief

ISBN 978-92-5-137102-2

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) This brief summarizes the evidence on the impacts of FAO 'Cash plus agricultural inputs' program in Somalia on food security, adoption of agricultural practices, wealth and productive assets.

Cite this content as:

Valli, E., Daidone, S., Sitko, N.,& Staffieri. I. 2022. Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings: Evidence from Somalia – Policy brief. Rome, FAO.

https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2691en

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Book (stand-alone)

Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings
The case of Somalia
2022

Also available in:

No results found.

This study examines the FAO cash plus agriculture program in Somalia. This multi-faceted intervention provides agricultural inputs, training and cash transfers to vulnerable agro-pastoralist households living in districts and villages that experienced severe weather shocks. We exploit variations in the implementation of this program to assess the effect of receiving inputs only and inputs plus cash on a range of protective and productive outcomes. Specifically, we make use of household survey data collected in 2019 and apply a quasi-experimental Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Analysis (IPWRA) matching approach to estimate the impact of the two different interventions on food security, assets, adoption of inputs and adoption of agricultural practices. We find positive and significant impacts on a number of productive outcomes and some difference between the two treatments: while inputs seem to increase asset wealth, cash plus reduces food insecurity and higher levels of income diversification, suggesting that the cash component facilitates investments in livelihoods diversification. Moreover, we find evidence of heterogeneous impacts under conditions of weather shocks, and between socio-economic segments of the population.
Book (stand-alone)
Rapid assessment and microsimulation of impacts of a Cash+ pilot intervention in Kyrgyzstan 2022

Also available in:

Russian

This report presents the results of a mixed-method rapid assessment that provides both indicative quantitative information and in-depth qualitative analysis on the household-level impacts of the Cash+ pilot. The assessment focused on the effects of the pilot intervention on dietary diversity, income generation and poverty reduction outcomes as well as household decision-making. To establish the impacts of the pilot, the assessment relied on comparing subjective perceptions of households that participated in the pilot, those receiving only cash transfers but not the pilot, and a sample of other households that did not receive either support (as a comparison group). This was accomplished through a qualitative study and a quantitative study. The rapid assessment was complemented by a microsimulation analysis of potential poverty impacts and implications for food consumption diversity that made use of the Kyrgyz Integrated Household Survey (KIHS) conducted in 2014, which is representative at the national level.
Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet

Cash and voucher assistance
Providing live-saving assistance to enable vulnerable families to cope with crises or shocks and promoting resilient agricultural livelihoods for the future
2023

Also available in:

No results found.

Through its cash and voucher assistance programmes, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) provides immediate relief to vulnerable households while also helping them to protect their assets from shocks (e.g. drought, illness, conflict, poor production), overcome cash shortages, promote their livelihoods and improve their food security and nutrition.