Thumbnail Image

Decentralisation and rural development: The role of the public and private sectors in the provision of agricultural support services








Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Decentralization and rural development: FAO's experiences 1997
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The present report commences by presenting a study carried out by FAO on the risks associated with processes of decentralization. An account is then provided of the valuable knowledge-base and experience which FAO has built up, which places it in a position to propose appropriate ways of responding to such risks. Identification of the latter and of FAO's valuable advantages makes it possible, finally, to put forward a decentralization model based on a methodology of regionalization and different iation and three associated policies: information, training and organization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Role of government institutions for promotion of agriculture and rural development in Asia and the Pacific Region
    Dimensions & Issues
    2002
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The focus here is on the role of government institutions, traditional and new players, their capacities, mandate, ways of operation at the national and decentralised levels and their linkages with the private sector partner institutions at all levels.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation of the project “FAO support to the Georgian agricultural sector (European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development [ENPARD III])”
    Project code: GCP/GEO/011/EC
    2023
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This document is a terminal evaluation of the project “FAO support to the Georgian agricultural sector (European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development [ENPARD III])”. The project was funded under the third phase of the European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (ENPARD III) and implemented in Georgia from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2022. The evaluation’s aim was to assess the overall achievement of the project objectives and outcomes, to evaluate the project’s success, identify good implementation practices, drawbacks, and lessons learned, and to renew the linkages to other projects and partnerships or arrangements in place that have contributed to the adequate implementation of project activities.The evaluation covered the whole project implementation period, including three main areas of concern: i) capacity development of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture (MEPA); ii) grant support to farmers/agricultural companies; and iii) technical support to famers. A systematic and objective assessment was made of the project design, the project’s implementation and its results in order to determine the project’s relevance and achievement of objectives, but also its efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. The evaluation was theory-based and used a utilization-focused and participatory approach. The assessment applied a qualitative approach to collect the data, and utilized the following tools: i) desk review; ii) interviews with project stakeholders; iii) focus group discussions with project end beneficiaries; and iv) field visits to project sites.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.