6.1 Fish Prices
6.2 Financial Analysis of Fishing Operations
6.3 Employment in the Fishing Sector
Fish prices fluctuate considerably in response to quality, time and quantity of landings, and supply of other foodstuffs, and any analysis of fish prices is complicated by the numerous fish species landed. Therefore any data on such prices need to be treated with some caution.
There has been no comprehensive report on fish prices in West Africa since the reports prepared by Lagoin and Salmon (196 and 1970). Nevertheless some scattered data on present prices have been presented and analysed here, and certain tentative conclusions drawn from the analysis. In general the data on fish prices throughout the Region are poor, and need to be improved if more definitive statements on, for example, trends in fishermen's earnings vis-à-vis the consumer price index are required.
It is apparent from the data presented in Table 6.1 that fish prices are generally lower in the northern part of the Region where fish are more abundant than in the southern part of the Region It is also apparent that the average ex-vessel price of fish caught by inshore vessels is generally higher than the price of fish caught by canoes.
This difference in price between canoe-caught and vessel-caught fish can partly be explained by the better marketing of vessel-caught fish. The fish is nearly always assured of a buyer because the vessel unloads in an urban centre (where not only is there a large market for high-priced fish but also sometimes a fishmeal plant for processing low-priced fish). Furthermore a number of vessels specifically aim to catch high-value species, which can sometimes be exported.
The canoe fishermen are not assured of a good price for their high-value fish, particularly if they land in isolated rural areas. Even if the quality of their catch is better than that of the vessels, they will often obtain a lower price for the fish, simply because transport costs must be taken into account before an urban market is reached. In the case of lower-valued fish such as sardinella, it appears that ex-canoe prices are not necessarily lower than ex-vessel prices, because the demand for the cheaper fish in rural areas is often higher than in urban areas. For example, in Senegal in 1964, the average ex-vessel sardinella price was 9 FCFA per kilogram whereas the lowest rural average price was 12 FCFA per kilogram. In 1974 the urban price for sardinella at 15 FCFA per kilogram was still lower than the average canoe price over the whole country, at 20 FCFA per kilogram.
Table 6.1 Comparison of prices of fish landed by canoes and inshore vessels (1964)
FCFA per kilogram |
||
Country |
Canoe |
Vessel |
Mauritania |
28 |
27 |
Senegal |
19 |
37 |
Gambia |
21 |
· |
Guinea |
54 |
78 |
Sierra Leone |
21 |
42 |
Liberia |
19 |
47 |
Ivory Coast |
27 |
46 |
Ghana |
27 |
59 |
Togo |
37 |
· |
Benin |
39 |
51 |
Nigeria |
27 |
· |
Cameroon |
54 |
39 |
Equatorial Guinea |
36 |
85 |
Gabon |
37 |
80 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
34 |
34 |
Congo |
40 |
36 |
Zaire |
30 |
30 |
Average |
32 |
49 |
Source: Lagoin and Salmon (1967 and 1970)Fish prices in Ghana have generally been climbing quite fast in recent years (Table 6.2). Between 1971 and 1974 the average price for distant water trawled fish has increased by 75 percent whereas the price of inshore vessel fish has increased by 90 percent and canoe-caught fish by 133 percent. Prices for fish caught by artisanal fishermen have nevertheless been increasing at a slower rate than the consumer price index (Annex Table II). This disadvantageous trend in prices is additional to the disadvantageous trend in weight of artisanal landings, which dropped between 1971 and 1974 due to the collapse of the sardinella fishery leaving the fishermen now financially poorer than in 1971. The higher price obtained for distant water fish is due to the fish being landed in urban centres whereas the inshore vessel and canoe-caught fish is landed mainly in rural areas.
Table 6.2 Ghana ex-vessel fish prices (1971-74)
Cedi per ton |
||||
Fishing technique |
Year |
|||
1971 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
|
Distant water trawler |
212 |
306 |
314 |
372 |
Inshore vessel |
160 |
140 |
208 |
304 |
Canoe |
134 |
142 |
306 |
313 |
Source: Department of Fisheries, AccraIn Morocco the wholesale fish prices are grouped by price level into three categories (Table 6.3). The highest category increased in price by 58 percent between 1969 and 1974, the second category increased in price by 51 percent, and the third category price increase was 38 percent. These cheap fish of the third category are mostly caught by industrially operated vessels, and all three categories of fish have shown price increases exceeding the consumer price index.
Table 6.3 Morocco wholesale fish prices (1969-74)
Category of fish |
Year |
|||||
1969 |
1970 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
||
1st category |
6.31 |
7.01 |
8.81 |
9.64 |
9.96 |
|
|
percent increase |
|
11.1 |
25.7 |
9.5 |
3.3 |
2nd category |
2.22 |
2.31 |
3.29 |
3.44 |
3.35 |
|
|
percent increase |
|
4.0 |
42.4 |
4.6 |
- 2.6 |
3rd category |
0.68 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
0.82 |
0.94 |
|
|
percent increase |
|
8.8 |
1.3 |
9.3 |
14.6 |
Source: Office National des Pêches, CasablancaAccording to a report on Cameroon in the magazine 'Afrique Agriculture' (1975) the price of imported frozen fish, landed mainly by Soviet Union vessels, has remained stable in recent years whereas the price of locally-landed fish has almost doubled (Table 6.4). This difference in price is due to the increased operating costs of Cameroon vessels relative to those of Soviet vessels. However the price of stockfish has more than doubled, and this price increase reflects the greatly increased costs of fishing operations in the North Atlantic.
Table 6.4 Cameroon quayside fish prices (1971-74)
FCFA per kilogram |
||||
Type of fish |
Year |
|||
1971 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
|
Imported frozen fish (ex-vessel) |
42.1 |
40.6 |
39.1 |
44.0 |
Frozen fish from locally-based boats (ex-vessel) |
50.3 |
58.9 |
86.1 |
99.5 |
Stock fish (CIF) |
239.0 |
272.0 |
386.0 |
520.0 |
Source: Afrique Agriculture (1975)Recent data on prices in selected countries of the Region are presented in Table 6.5. The average price of canoe-caught fish in Senegal may be biased to the high side, as 25 percent of the weight of artisanal landings are unidentified fish and have been rather arbitrarily assigned a price of 60 FCFA per kilogram which may be too high. The high average price of trawler-caught fish is due to the trawlers rejecting at sea the cheap fish and only landing the higher - priced shrimp, sole and croaker. The difference in price of the Ghana fish caught by different gear shows the high regard for locally-caught sardinella, the low average price of much of the trawler-caught fish (mainly triggerfish), and the relatively high regard for distant water caught frozen fish. On the basis of these few data, it is unfortunately impossible to adequately compare the 1974 prices with those collected by Lagoin and Salmon (op. cit.).
Table 6.5 Selected data on average prices of fish landed by canoes and vessels (1974)
FCFA per kilogram |
||||
Country |
Canoe |
Inshore trawler |
Purse seiner |
Distant water caught frozen |
Senegal |
54 |
204 |
15 |
· |
Ivory Coast |
· · · |
64 |
50 |
· |
Ghana |
73 |
62 |
112 |
89 |
Cameroon |
· · · |
· · · |
· · · |
99 |
Source: CECAF Project estimatesAnnual data on fish and food prices in Sierra Leone and Liberia, since 1962 and 1964 respectively, are presented in Tables 6.6 and 6.7. In Sierra Leone between 1962 and 1975, the price increases were 128.8 percent for rice, 100.0 percent for fresh fish, 52.9 percent for beef and only 20.7 percent for the dried bonga fish. This dried bonga is produced by the artisanal fishermen of Sierra Leone and Gambia. The price increases of Liberian foods have also been rapid in recent years, and particularly between 1972 and 1973 when rice, for example, increased in price by 55.8 percent. It is interesting to note that the imported fish, such as the horse mackerel, and a tin of sardines showed higher price increases than the artisanally-caught sardinella. This low price increase of sardinella (and of bonga in Sierra Leone) indicates that artisanal fishermen's earnings may not have increased in line with the consumer price index.
Table 6.6 Sierra Leone retail food prices (1962-75)
Cents per ten ounce piece |
|||||||||
Food |
Year |
||||||||
1962 |
1964 |
1966 |
1968 |
1970 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
1975 |
|
Dried bonga |
14.3 |
12.1 |
10.4 |
11.1 |
11.5 |
10.8 |
12.9 |
15.1 |
16.3 |
Fresh fish |
6.5 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
6.5 |
7.7 |
9.6 |
7.9 |
10.2 |
17.8 |
Rice |
5.9 |
5.9 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
7.1 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
10.4 |
13.0 |
Beef |
27.2 |
25.8 |
21.9 |
21.9 |
25.0 |
26.6 |
35.4 |
36.5 |
41.2 |
Source: Central Statistical Office, Freetown
Table 6.7 Liberia retail food prices (1964-74)
Cents per pound |
||||||
|
1964 |
1968 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
Percent rise |
Sardinella eba dried |
35.6 |
24.9 |
38.3 |
42.7 |
54.2 |
52.2 |
Pampano (Trachinotus spp.) |
25.8 |
25.7 |
20.7 |
33.8 |
47.1 |
82.5 |
Horse mackerel |
11.8 |
14.3 |
18.9 |
19.3 |
29.4 |
149.1 |
Croaker |
13.8 |
14.0 |
19.1 |
22.1 |
32.2 |
133.3 |
2½ oz tin sardines |
10.0 |
10.0 |
14.6 |
16.8 |
22.7 |
127.0 |
Brisket meat |
60.0 |
60.0 |
60.0 |
69.4 |
83.9 |
39.8 |
Cassava |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
5.0 |
7.4 |
117.6 |
Rice |
12.0 |
13.4 |
12.9 |
20.1 |
24.9 |
107.5 |
Source: Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs, MonroviaThe prices at which frozen fish are imported into West African countries (Table 6.8) are rather varied due probably to inconsistent methods of collection of such data by some customs authorities. The approximate c.i.f. price of frozen fish at West African ports in 1975 approached U.S. $ 300 per ton. Horse mackerel probably forms about 80 percent of the weight of all imported frozen fish.
Table 6.8 Price of imported frozen fish (1964-75)
US dollars per ton |
||||
Country |
Year |
|||
1964 |
1973 |
1974 |
1975 |
|
Sierra Leone |
138 |
129 |
242 |
· · · |
Liberia |
162 |
342 |
· · · |
· · · |
Ivory Coast |
· · · |
192 |
235 |
339 |
Ghana |
200 |
· |
· |
· |
Togo |
167 |
168 |
199 |
254 |
Benin |
176 |
153 |
· · · |
· · · |
Nigeria |
154 |
346 |
· · · |
· · · |
Cameroon |
· · · |
195 |
220 |
· · · |
Zaire |
· · · |
322 |
300 |
· · · |
Average price U.S.$ per ton |
166 |
231 |
239 |
296 |
FCFA per kilogram |
33 |
54 |
53 |
60 |
Source: Lagoin and Salmon (1967) CECAF Project estimatesThe wholesale prices at which imported frozen fish are sold (Table 6.9) are inclusive of the entry tax that is imposed in various countries. The Freetown prices are generally the lowest. The prices are closely followed by the prices in Abidjan where there is reported to be no entry tax on fish (mainly sardinella) imported from Senegal and other C.E.A.O. countries but a 30 percent tax on fish imported from such countries as the Soviet Union. Togolese importers pay a 20 percent entry tax and in Benin the entry tax is 40 percent. In Nigeria there is no entry tax but the higher prices are due to the increased costs of port congestion where carrier vessels wait 4 to 6 weeks outside port before unloading. In all countries except Sierra Leone and Liberia, the sardinella price is lower than the horse mackerel price. The wholesale prices at Brazzaville (Congo) are higher due to transport costs by train from Pointe Noire. No frozen sardinella are imported into the Congo as there is an excess supply from the local landings.
Table 6.9 Wholesale price of frozen fish imported into CECAF countries (1974)
FCFA per kilogram |
||||||
Country |
City |
Species |
||||
English name: |
Horse Mackerel |
Spanish Mackerel |
Sardinella |
Sea bream |
||
Russian name: |
Stavrida |
Skumbria |
Sardinella |
Karas |
||
Sierra Leone |
Freetown |
|
86 |
86 |
96 |
106 |
Liberia |
Monrovia |
|
114 |
114 |
126 |
138 |
Ivory Coast |
Abidjan |
|
87 |
92 |
67 |
134 |
Togo |
Lomé |
|
98 |
113 |
95 |
121 |
Benin |
Cotonou |
|
123 |
131 |
117 |
148 |
Nigeria |
Lagos |
|
137 |
· · · |
96 |
· · · |
Congo |
Brazzaville |
|
160 |
150 |
· |
210 |
Source: CECAF Project informationIt has been difficult to draw precise conclusions on trading margins. Lagoin and Salmon (1967) found that, in many countries, the retail price was generally 100 percent above that of the ex-vessel price, although sometimes the price was as much as 200 percent higher and sometimes as little as 8 percent higher. Le Gall and Petitjean (1975) found that retail margins in the Congo were generally 50 percent higher than the wholesale price, although this could be 110 percent in the case of Sardinella aurita. This high margin on sardinella is because government controls the wholesale but not the retail price.
A study relating ex-vessel fish price to supply has recently been undertaken at Pointe Noire in the Congo (Le Gall and Petitjean, 1975). They were able to demonstrate that the supply of the pelagic shoaling fish sardinella can be so great that prices fall as landings increase. Indeed this fall in prices is so great that actual receipts from fishing diminish as landings increase. One conclusion is that the fish should be frozen and released at gradual intervals on to the market over a longer period and at a higher price. In contrast to the fast fall of sardinella prices as landings increase, the trawler-caught demersal fish price does not decline so dramatically as landings increase. Indeed the price stabilises at about 73 FCFA per kilogram, and the total receipts from fishing continue to increase in proportion to increased landings.
In general the West African fish prices are not affected by world fish prices because the majority of the fish locally consumed (including that landed by Soviet and East European vessels) is not traded internationally. Nevertheless the world fish prices do have particular relevance to the shrimp, squid and cuttlefish, tuna, and fishmeal that are produced locally and exported, and the prices are shown in Table 6.10. In some ports of the Region, such as Nouadhibou, the world prices have particular significance to the value of fish landings and particularly of sea breams and cephalopods. Since 1973, the world fishmeal price has declined considerably and this has had an important effect on the fishing sector of Morocco and Mauritania where a number of fishmeal plants have closed. The c.i.f. price of fishmeal in Western Europe in 1975 was about U.S.$ 250 per ton and the World Bank has forecast that the world market price in 1980 will be about U.S.$ 380 per ton at 1974 constant prices.
Table 6.10 Prices of internationally traded fish and fish products
US dollars per metric ton |
||||||||
Commodity |
Year |
|||||||
1966 |
1968 |
1970 |
1971 |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
1975 |
|
Skipjack tuna |
292 |
288 |
349 |
408 |
446 |
497 |
599 |
519 |
Shrimp |
740 |
770 |
1662 |
2125 |
2513 |
3349 |
2557 |
4409 |
Fishmeal |
174 |
166 |
203 |
174 |
204 |
527 |
304 |
263 |
Squid/cuttlefish |
637 |
738 |
1073 |
1544 |
1476 |
1680 |
· · · |
· · · |
Note: Tuna price, premium grade, ex-vessel California: shrimp price, ex-vessel U.S.A., South Atlantic and Gulf, weighted average all sizes/heads off weight; fishmeal, menhaden, U.S. East Coast; fresh squid and cuttlefish, Japan retail price.Sources: National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington, D.C., and an FAO report quoting Annual Report on Family Income and Expenditure Surveys, Office of Prime Minister, Japan
There have been some important financial studies of theoretical fishing operations in Morocco, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. It is hoped that, by summarising these studies, there will follow more intensive attention to basic data and that, in the near future, a better understanding of the financial criteria affecting fishing vessel operations will emerge. As a result of such studies, it should be possible to determine whether government incentives appear to be required to stimulate fishery investment and fish output.
Morocco has a fairly sophisticated fishery sector relative to the level of industrialisation achieved in fishing and fish processing operations in other countries of the Region. The fishing fleet is almost fully industrialised, and government accords grants and loans to companies and individuals for improvement of their vessels' fishing profitability. The Norwegian consultancy firm FIDECO studied the state of fishery development (FIDECO, 1974) in the country and analysed the financial operations of purse seiner vessels that were working in 1972. FIDECO grouped the fishing vessels into three size ranges, of less than 25 gross tons, 25 to 40 gross tons, and 40 to 60 gross tons. FIDECO examined the operations of the vessels based in Safi, Essaouira and Agadir and found that the internal rate of return for Safi vessels was negative, and that the rate of return for Essaouira and Agadir vessels was barely positive. In general the rate of return on vessels of the 25 to 40 gross ton range was higher than for other ranges. To some extent the losses of the Safi vessels can be absorbed by the owners, the canneries, for at least the vessels ensure a supply of fish to the canneries. However the key to increasing profitability appears to be in increasing the number of trips and number of hauls per year. In general FIDECO believe that the possibility of obtaining any reduction in operating costs is small unless the number of crew on each vessel is reduced.
FIDECO proposed that a larger vessel than presently used be introduced to the sardine fishery. Based on sardine prices of 200 to 300 dirham (U.S.$ 46 to 70) per ton, the vessel is projected to need to catch 3,900 to 5,800 tons per year to break even. The vessels would fish south of Agadir and would give priority to catching fish for the canneries. This means that brailing of the catch, refrigeration of the fish shortly after catching (primarily with boxing and ice), and a high frequency of calls in port for landing are central operational features. Capital costs are reduced by the investment grant which is 20 percent of the capital cost of the new vessel and revenues are boosted by an 8 percent government subsidy granted to increase landing prices.
Table 6.11 Summary of Morocco purse seiner operations.
Guidelines on operations: generally 35-45 GT, with engine of 150-350 HP, catching 5-6 tons per trip, 175 trips per year, 50% catch sold to canneries at 400 DH (U.S.$ 93) per ton, and 50% catch sold to meal plants at 200 DH (U.S.$ 46) per ton.
thousand US dollars |
||||
|
Size (gross tons) |
|||
-25 |
25-40 |
40-60 |
||
Capital cost |
35 |
46 |
58 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Agadir |
40 |
56 |
59 |
Essaouira |
· |
56 |
· |
|
Safi |
23 |
35 |
43 |
|
Operating costs |
14 |
16 |
20 |
Source: FIDECO (1974)
Table 6.12 Specifications and costs for proposed FIDECO purse seiner operation
|
Unit |
|
Length |
metres |
28.5 |
Engine |
horsepower |
600 |
Catch per year |
tons |
3,900 to 5,800 |
Capital cost |
U.S.$ '000 |
651 |
Operating costs |
U.S.$ '000 |
126 |
Catch sales |
U.S.$ '000 |
249 |
Source: See Table 6.11In spite of the nature of the Senegal fishing industry, which includes a very active artisanal fishery, as well as a diverse industrial sector, there has never been, as far as is known, a detailed analysis of the budgets of the country's fishing vessels. However FAO has presented a breakdown of costs and revenue of a handliner vessel (Table 6.13) and of a freezer carrier (Table 6.14). With financial assistance from the French Government, some handliners were introduced to the fishery in the 1960's. It is shortly expected to continue this programme with a vessel of a similar size and of a flexibility that would allow trawling and purse seining to be undertaken from the vessel, freezer carriers are playing an increasingly important role as the frozen fish trade expands in West Africa. Since Senegal hopes to considerably increase such exports, it would appear logical for the country to examine the possibility of acquiring freezer carriers.
Table 6.13 Fishing costs and operations of a Senegal handliner
thousand FCFA |
|||
Specifications and capital cost: |
|
|
|
|
Length, 16.0 metres; crew, 10; engine, 70 HP |
|
|
Cost |
|
19,845.0 |
|
Operating costs: |
|
|
|
|
Fuel, ice, maintenance, etc. |
3,800.0 |
|
Crew |
4,800.0 |
|
|
Owners' costs |
3,600.0 |
|
|
|
|
12,200.0 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
120 tons p.a. x 120 FCFA/kilogram |
|
14,400.0 |
Source: FAO (1975b)
Table 6.14 Costs of a refrigerated cargo carrier based in Senegal
thousand US dollars |
|||
Specifications and capital cost: |
|
|
|
|
Length, 277 feet; deadweight, 1,950 tons; crew, 16; trips, 24 round trips
p.a., 250 sailing days |
|
|
Cost |
|
6,000.0 |
|
Operating costs: |
|
|
|
|
Fuel, maintenance, etc. |
665.0 |
|
Crew |
252.0 |
|
|
|
|
917.0 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
Based on 43,000 tons sardinella at U.S.$ 49 per ton and no return freight
|
|
2,107.0 |
Based on 43,000 tons sardinella and 25,000 tons tuna on return at U.S.$
31 per ton |
|
2,108.0 |
Source: FAO (1974a)A comprehensive analysis of fishing vessel operations has been undertaken in Sierra Leone by Italian consultants (PROPESCA 1974) and an FAO/NORAD team (FAO 1975c), and a summary of their basic assumptions is presented in Table 6.15. The analysis of the FAO/NORAD team has been based on the operations of second-hand vessels of about 5 years of age, and they did not investigate the possibility of recommending the use of newly constructed, more expensive vessels. The PROPESCA assumptions for the artisanal and trawler/purse seiner vessels are that they be constructed locally and that only the purse seiner be of a steel hull and imported. Both these studies recommend that, in Sierra Leone, it would be feasible to increase the number of fishing vessels of different sizes for fishing different species. In fact the results of both studies serve as justification for the government to approach development banks to request finance for investment in the Sierra Leone fishing sector.
Table 6.15 Key features of fishing vessel operations in Sierra Leone
|
Unit |
Artisanal |
Trawler/purse seiner |
Purse seiner |
Purse seiner |
Tuna pole and line |
Freezer trawler |
Length |
Feet |
27 |
40 |
70 |
62 |
· · · |
· · · |
Engine |
Horsepower |
30 |
100 |
250 |
420 |
200 |
1,000 |
Fishing time |
Days |
200 |
200 |
200 |
300 |
· · · |
200 |
Catch per day |
Tons |
0.125 |
1.2 |
17.5 |
14 |
· · · |
8.5 |
Catch per year |
Tons |
25 |
240 |
3,500 |
4,200 |
460 |
1,715 |
Value per ton |
U.S.$ |
304 |
152 |
46 |
50 |
400 |
350 |
Catch value |
U.S.$ '000 |
7.6 |
36.5 |
162 |
210.6 |
184 |
600 |
Capital cost |
U.S.$ '000 |
8.1 |
33.9 |
4001/ |
269.1 |
2001/ |
1,0001/ |
Operating costs |
U.S.$ '000 |
2.3 |
20.5 |
108 |
103.2 |
155 |
430 |
Source |
|
PROPESCA |
PROPESCA |
FAO |
PROPESCA |
FAO |
FAO |
1/ Second hand vessels 5 years oldFishery planners of the Nigerian Federal Department of Fisheries have analysed the budgets of many fishing operations on the basis of various assumptions. These budget analyses were undertaken to aid decisions on investment to be taken in the Third National Development Plan (1975-80). One budget that is of particular relevance to any artisanal development programme is shown in Table 6.16, and the assumptions that have been chosen could form the basis for choosing similar assumptions in other CECAF countries and particularly in those countries where a canoe similar to the ones used in Nigeria is employed. Nevertheless a preliminary analysis of the assumptions indicates that the expected catch rates are possibly unrealistically high.
Source: PROPESCA (1974) and FAO (1975c)
Table 6.16 Operations of a gillnet (set net) and ring netting canoe in coastal waters, Nigeria
naira |
|||||
Capital costs: |
|||||
|
Canoe (8-10 metres) |
600 |
|
||
Outboard (33 horsepower) |
800 |
|
|||
Ring net and gillnets |
1,920 |
|
|||
Total |
|
3,320 |
|||
8 fishermen for ring netting |
|
|
|||
3 fishermen for gill netting |
|
|
|||
Operating costs: |
|||||
|
Labour at N 1/man/day |
|
|
||
|
ring netting (80 days) |
640 |
|
||
set netting (120 days) |
360 |
|
|||
Fuel at 56.3 litres/day at 8.9 kobo/litre |
1,000 |
|
|||
Lubricant 37.5 kg/day |
75 |
|
|||
Maintenance, |
engine |
100 |
|
||
|
canoe |
25 |
|
||
gear |
100 |
|
|||
Total |
|
2,300 |
|||
Returns: |
|||||
|
Bonga, 7,600 pieces (2.16 tons) per day for 80 days at N 5 for 200 pieces
(about 125 lb or 57 kilograms) |
15,200 |
|
||
Others, 6.4 mt p.a. at N 440/mt |
2,816 |
|
|||
Total |
|
18,016 |
|||
Upkeep of fishermen for non - fishing days |
|||||
|
Ring net fishermen - 285 days at N 1/day |
2,280 |
|
||
Gillnet fishermen - 245 days at N 1/day |
735 |
|
Source: Federal Department of Fisheries, LagosAll fishermen have lately been heavily affected by the inflationary spiral of increased fuel and gear prices. The most dramatic price increases have been those covering outboard motors which, between 1973 and 1974, increased in price by 36 percent and, between 1974 and 1975, increased by 31 percent. Nets and twine have shown a less dramatic although still notable increase in value. These steady cost increases and the fluctuating fish prices play an important part in determining the ability of fishermen to obtain incomes which are of a similar or higher level than other occupations. Such costs and prices will also determine the return on investment in fishing, and the ability of the fishing sector to attract capital expenditure.
Data on employment in fishing, fish processing, distribution and marketing are a particularly important guideline to the level of fishery development in a country and the contribution of the fishery sector to national socio-economic development. Yet such data as are available in CECAF countries on employment are rarely adequate for satisfactorily obtaining such a guideline.
In general it is relatively easy to estimate the number of persons engaged in fishing on the basis of the number of vessels and canoes based in a country, multiplied by the average number of crew per vessel. Nevertheless, it is often difficult to know how many vessels are continually operating and how many of the crew are fishing full-time rather than part-time, and a number of full-time fishermen use only beach seines and traps and never fish from canoes.
However it is even less easy to estimate the number of persons involved in fish processing, distribution and marketing (Table 6.17). Women (or mammies) have a tight control of the retail fish markets in many countries and the intensive labour employed in this marketing can involve numerous members of a woman's family, depending on time of day, day of the week, or season. Often the fish is smoked prior to sale. In Nigeria it is estimated that 10 persons are employed in the fishing sector on shore to every person employed in a canoe or vessel, but this ratio is not necessarily characteristic of all West African countries.
Table 6.17 Employment in marine fisheries
Country |
Fishing |
Processing, marketing, etc. |
Morocco |
15,000 |
20,000 |
Mauritania |
2,500 |
2,000 |
Senegal |
30,000 |
3,000 |
Gambia |
1,500 |
· · · |
Gape Verde |
1,500 |
· · · |
Guinea |
5,000 |
· · · |
Sierra Leone |
12,000 |
· · · |
Liberia |
3,000 |
1,000 |
Ivory Coast |
16,000 |
· · · |
Ghana |
66,000 |
· · · |
Togo |
4,000 |
· · · |
Benin |
3,000 |
2,500 |
Nigeria |
61,000 |
· · · |
Cameroon |
12,000 |
· · · |
Equatorial Guinea |
5,000 |
500 |
Gabon |
1,500 |
500 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
2,800 |
· · · |
Congo |
1,000 |
· · · |
Zaïre |
500 |
· · · |
Lagoin and Salmon (1967 and 1970)As pressure mounts to increase employment opportunities in a number of countries, it becomes necessary to examine the ratio between capital employed and employment created. In Tables 6.18 and 6.19 are presented the capital cost of investments commonly incurred in the fishery sector, and the number of jobs created by such investment. In terms of employment creation, it is seen that investment in canoes for the artisanal fishery is by far the cheapest way of increasing employment. Other cheap ways of increasing employment are by investing in a tuna pole and line vessel and a small all-purpose fishing vessel. The most expensive way of creating employment is by investing in large purse seiners or trawlers.
FAO Fishery Country Profiles
CECAF Project estimates
Table 6.18 Indicative investment and employment in fishing units
Unit |
Length metres |
Tonnage GT |
Engine horsepower |
Investment x $ 1,000 |
Employment |
$ 1,000 per job |
Canoe |
8 |
· · · |
20 |
2.5 |
5 |
0.5 |
All-purpose vessel |
9 |
· · · |
30 |
20.0 |
9 |
2.2 |
Handliner |
16 |
· · · |
70 |
90.0 |
10 |
9.0 |
Trawler |
15 |
45 |
200 |
120.0 |
10 |
12.0 |
20 |
90 |
365 |
200.0 |
15 |
13.3 |
|
25 |
120 |
450 |
300.0 |
20 |
15.0 |
|
75 |
2,000 |
3,500 |
6,000.0 |
60 |
100.0 |
|
Purse seiner |
18 |
80 |
210 |
200.0 |
14 |
14.3 |
28 |
150 |
600 |
667.8 |
20 |
33.3 |
|
Tuna pole and line |
16 |
50 |
200 |
200.0 |
23 |
8.7 |
Source: CECAF Project estimatesDetermination of capital investment/employment trends with regard to processing and on shore related fishery industries (Table 6.19) is more difficult than with regard to fishing vessels. In particular this is because the construction costs of buildings can sometimes be very low, or indeed nil if part of an unused building is adapted to serve as a factory floor. Some processing facilities are highly labour intensive, such as canning, shrimp processing, fish filleting, cephalopod cleaning, whereas others are not labour intensive, for example fishmeal plants, ice plants and bulk fish freezing plants.
This sort of analysis should be treated with some caution as so many combinations of investment and employment creation are possible. For example sometimes the low employment on vessels is compensated for by high employment in on shore processing and in marketing operations. Furthermore, this type of analysis does not take into account the value added to be expected from each type of investment.
Some areas where future attention might be focused to evaluate the role of government development strategies in affecting employment are: (i) the effect of canoe motorisation on employment, either in actual fishing, or in increased employment in the processing and marketing network to deal with increased catches, (ii) the various options open to government in increasing fishery employment in rural and/or urban areas, and (iii) the role of subsidies and/or price increases in increasing employment.
Table 6.19 Indicative investment and employment in processing plants
Unit |
tons of raw material per day |
$ 1,000 invested |
Employment |
$ 1,000 per job |
Fish fillet, freezing and cold storage |
5 |
80.0 |
40 |
2.0 |
Shrimp freezing and cold storage |
1 |
60.0 |
25 |
2.4 |
Canning |
10 |
100.0 |
100 |
1.0 |
Fishmeal plant |
20 |
100.0 |
20 |
5.0 |
50 |
400.0 |
25 |
16.0 |
|
100 |
700.0 |
30 |
23.3 |
|
Ice plant |
20 |
120.0 |
6 |
20.0 |
100 |
500.0 |
10 |
50.0 |
Source: CECAF Project estimates