Capacity Development Project for Investment and Policy (CAADP - CDPIP). Strengthening Systemic Capacities for the Formulation and Management of National Agriculture Investment Plans (NAIPS)
Approaches and resources based on CDPIP experiences in Cameroon, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho and Tanzania
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentEvaluation of the “Capacity-Development Project for Investment Planning & Policy (CDPIP)” - GCP -INT-132-GER - Management response 2016
Also available in:
No results found.The Final Evaluation is generally in line with the internal findings by the project team. The follow-up recommendations are however considered generic “good practices” for undertaking Capacity Development (CD) activities. -
DocumentEvaluation of the “Capacity-Development Project for Investment Planning & Policy (CDPIP)” - GCP /INT/132/GER Final Report 2015
Also available in:
No results found.The overall purpose of the evaluation is to assess the project’s conceptual, inception and implementation phases in at least three of the five countries in which it is operational, until the formal end of the project on 31st August 2014. It is to note that the formal inception phase started at different times according to the context of each project country. For the three countries proposed for evaluation inception starting dates are the following: DRC, August 2012; Cameroon, November 2012; Leso tho, December 2012. -
Book (series)Evaluation of the project "Strengthening institutions and capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and State Veterinary Inspection Service for Policy Formulation
Project code: GCP/TAJ/013/EC
2023Also available in:
No results found.The EU-funded project aimed to strengthen institutions and capacities for strategic decision-making, planning, regulation, quality control and management in the food and agriculture sectors, including livestock. The evaluation found that the project was well aligned with the needs and priorities of national stakeholders, with FAO’s strategic objectives and with community beneficiaries. Several strategies, assessments and policy papers were developed, pilot initiatives were started, the Ministry of Agriculture was sensitized to reform processes and its changing role in the context of a market economy. Furthermore, capacities for delivering animal health services have improved considerably and are used. The project managed to navigate across institutional changes, although it suffered from delays that impeded the complete implementation of the pilot initiatives on agrarian reform. Acknowledging FAO’s comparative advantage in assisting the initiation of agrarian reform, the evaluation makes a number of recommendations for a successful policy reform, which include continuing to work closely with all involved ministries and stakeholders at all levels, to guide and steer the process from the start through endorsement; alongside a systematic approach to capacity building and training for involved ministries.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.