Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentOther documentFiche pays sur les capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD (Thaïlande)
Évaluation 2018/19 des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO
2019Le Bureau du Statisticien en chef (OCS) a mené début 2019 l'évaluation des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO pour donner un aperçu de la capacité des systèmes statistiques des pays membres à suivre et publier les 21 indicateurs des ODD dont la FAO est garante. L’enquête a collecté des informations sur les mécanismes de coordination nationaux relatifs à la communication sur les ODD, la disponibilité des données, les plans pour produire les données manquantes et les besoins en matière d’assistance technique. Les répondants étaient principalement les coordonnateurs nationaux du suivi des ODD ou les agents de liaison nommés par la présidence du bureau national de statistiques. Les résultats vont aider le siège de la FAO et ses bureaux décentralisés à concevoir des interventions ciblées et mobiliser des ressources pour soutenir les pays dans la collecte, l’analyse et l’utilisation des indicateurs des ODD dans le processus de décision. -
DocumentOther documentFiche pays sur les capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD (Suède)
Évaluation 2018/19 des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO
2019Le Bureau du Statisticien en chef (OCS) a mené début 2019 l'évaluation des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO pour donner un aperçu de la capacité des systèmes statistiques des pays membres à suivre et publier les 21 indicateurs des ODD dont la FAO est garante. L’enquête a collecté des informations sur les mécanismes de coordination nationaux relatifs à la communication sur les ODD, la disponibilité des données, les plans pour produire les données manquantes et les besoins en matière d’assistance technique. Les répondants étaient principalement les coordonnateurs nationaux du suivi des ODD ou les agents de liaison nommés par la présidence du bureau national de statistiques. Les résultats vont aider le siège de la FAO et ses bureaux décentralisés à concevoir des interventions ciblées et mobiliser des ressources pour soutenir les pays dans la collecte, l’analyse et l’utilisation des indicateurs des ODD dans le processus de décision. -
DocumentOther documentFiche pays sur les capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD (Fédération de Russie)
Évaluation 2018/19 des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO
2019Le Bureau du Statisticien en chef (OCS) a mené début 2019 l'évaluation des capacités statistiques relatives aux indicateurs des ODD pertinents pour la FAO pour donner un aperçu de la capacité des systèmes statistiques des pays membres à suivre et publier les 21 indicateurs des ODD dont la FAO est garante. L’enquête a collecté des informations sur les mécanismes de coordination nationaux relatifs à la communication sur les ODD, la disponibilité des données, les plans pour produire les données manquantes et les besoins en matière d’assistance technique. Les répondants étaient principalement les coordonnateurs nationaux du suivi des ODD ou les agents de liaison nommés par la présidence du bureau national de statistiques. Les résultats vont aider le siège de la FAO et ses bureaux décentralisés à concevoir des interventions ciblées et mobiliser des ressources pour soutenir les pays dans la collecte, l’analyse et l’utilisation des indicateurs des ODD dans le processus de décision.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
Book (stand-alone)General interest bookCOVID-19 – Rapid impact assessment on the agrifood sector and rural areas in Türkiye 2023
Also available in:
No results found.This report assesses the impacts of the COVID-19 on the agrifood sector and rural areas in Türkiye. Taking a panoramic picture of the agrifood sector in the country during the COVID-19 period, the study portrays how the pandemic impact on agrifood chains, smallholders and rural economies in Türkiye. The report titled “COVID-19 Rapid Impact Assessment on Agri-Food Sector and Rural Areas in Türkiye” is an outcome of a joint study by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Türkiye. Besides assessments on how the pandemic has affected agrifood sector, the report presents policy recommendations for sector preparedness and response, and agricultural and rural resilience. Moreover, the report sheds light on the connection between its suggestions and the Sustainable Development Goals. Authors of this study aims to contribute to the COVID-19 Socio-Economic Impact and Response Task Team (SEIRTT) in United Nations Türkiye, co-led by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Resident Coordinator’s Office. In thematic terms, the report supports efforts to analyse socio-economic dimensions of the COVID-19 in Türkiye. Moreover, the report sets the basis for further institutional engagement with Government and other relevant partners and stakeholders in the short to medium term with respect to agriculture and food sectors. -
MeetingMeeting documentIPC - Abstracts of papers and posters presented at the 21st Session of the Commission 2000
Also available in:
No results found.The International Poplar Commission (IPC), founded in 1947, is a statutory body of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The functions of the IPC are to: (i) study the scientific, technical, social and economic aspects of poplar and willow cultivation; (ii) promote the exchange of ideas and material between research workers, producers and users; (iii) arrange joint research programs; (iv) stimulate the organization of congresses, meetings and study tours; (v) report and make recommendations to the Conference of FAO through the Director General of FAO; and (vi) make recommendations to National Poplar Commissions through the Director General of FAO and the Governments concerned. At present there are 37 member countries of the IPC, of which 14 are developing countries and five are countries with economies in transition. IPC Sessions are held every four years. The previous meeting was in Budapest, Hungary in 1996. Five Working Parties as subsidiary bodies of the IPC reflect the main issues concerning the cultivation and utilization of the Salicaceae including (i) Poplar and Willow Genetics, Conservation and Improvement; (ii) Poplar and Willow Diseases; (iii) Poplar and Willow Insect and Animal Pests; (iv) Production Systems and Environmental Applications for Poplars and Willows; and (v) Logging and Utilization of Poplar and Willow Wood. There is also a Sub-committee on Poplar and Willow Nomenclature and Registration. This report includes sub mitted abstracts to the meeting organizers including invited papers, oral presentations, and visual presentations (posters). They are listed here in alphabetical order by senior author's last name (from A to Z). -
Book (series)Technical studyImproving biosecurity through prudent and responsible use of veterinary medicines in aquatic food production 2012
Also available in:
No results found.The current trend towards increasing intensification and diversification of global aquaculture has lead to its dramatic growth, thus making aquaculture an important food-producing sector that provides an essential source of aquatic protein for a growing human population. For both developed and developing countries, the sector is recognized as creator of jobs and an important source of foreign export earnings. The expansion of commercial aquaculture, as is the case in commercial livestock and pou ltry production, has necessitated the routine use of veterinary medicines to prevent and treat disease outbreaks due to pathogens, assure healthy stocks and maximize production. The expanded and occasionally irresponsible global movements of live aquatic animals have been accompanied by the transboundary spread of a wide variety of pathogens that have sometimes caused serious damage to aquatic food productivity and resulted in serious pathogens becoming endemic in culture systems and the natura l aquatic environment. The use of appropriate antimicrobial treatments is one of the most effective management responses to emergencies associated with infectious disease epizootics. However, their inappropriate use can lead to problems related to increased frequency of bacterial resistance and the potential transfer of resistance genes in bacteria from the aquatic environment to other bacteria. Injudicious use of antimicrobials has also resulted in the occurrence of their residues in aquacultur e products, and as a consequence, bans by importing countries and associated economic impacts, including market loss have occurred. Since disease emergencies can happen even in well-managed aquaculture operations, careful planning on the use antimicrobials is essential in order to maximize their efficacy and minimize the selection pressure for increased frequencies of resistant variants. The prudent and responsible use of veterinary medicines is an essential component of successful commercial aq uaculture production systems. The FAO/AAHRI Expert Workshop on Improving Biosecurity through Prudent and Responsible Use of Veterinary Medicines in Aquatic Food Production was convened in Bangkok, Thailand from 15 to 18 December 2009, in order to understand the current status of the use of antimicrobials in aquaculture and to discuss the concerns and impacts of their irresponsible use on human health, the aquatic environment and trade. Such discussions became the basis for drafting recommenda tions targeted to the state and private sectors and for developing guiding principles on the responsible use of antimicrobials in aquaculture that will be part of the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries Technical Guidelines on Prudent and Responsible Use of Veterinary Medicines in Aquaculture. Since aquaculture is expected to continue to increase its contribution to the world¿s production of aquatic food, offer opportunities to alleviate poverty, increase employment and community de velopment and reduce overexploitation of natural aquatic resources, appropriate guidance to aquaculture stakeholders on the responsible use of veterinary medicines has become essential. Safe and effective veterinary medicines need to be available for efficient aquaculture production, and their use should be in line with established principles on prudent use to safeguard public and animal health. The use of such medicines should be part of national and on-farm biosecurity plans and in accordance with an overall national policy for sustainable aquaculture. This publication is presented in two parts: Part 1 contains 15 technical background papers presented during the expert workshop, contributed by 28 specialists and which served as a basis for the expert workshop deliberations; Part 2 contains the highlights of the expert workshop.