Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentZimbabwe: Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Country Programming Framework 2012-2015 2012
Also available in:
No results found.This document constitutes the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Country Programme Framework (CPF) 2012-15 for providing medium-term support to the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe (GoZ) in the areas of food and nutrition, agriculture, natural resources management and rural development. It is aligned with the Government’s priorities as expressed in the Medium Term Plan (MTP, 2011-2015) and other policy documents and regional development frameworks. The CPF is bas ed on the Zimbabwe United Nations Development Assistance Framework (ZUNDAF) agreed between the GoZ and the United Nations Country Team (UNCT) in 2011. -
DocumentLebanon: Lebanon Country Programming Framework 2012-2015 2012
Also available in:
No results found.This Country Programming Framework (CPF) has been prepared in order to revisit past technical cooperation between FAO and Lebanon in light of the changes in the global food and agriculture system and the changed circumstances of FAO and Lebanon. The view of the recent Independent External Evaluation of FAO underlies this work, that the Organization must consider becoming more of a facilitator or knowledge manager to assist informed decision-making where the neutrality of FAO gives it an absolute comparative advantage. It should also be acknowledged that the limited resources of FAO must be complemented by carefully targeted investments from other international as well as domestic sources. -
DocumentIran: Country Programming Framework (CPF) 2012-2016 for Iran’s Agriculture Sector 2012
Also available in:
No results found.The CPF represents an effort to make fuller use of FAO comparative advantages to better shape its development assistance to Iran, adopting a focused approach, which balances interventions in different directions with the relative importance of each priority in the context of their overall strategic importance.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.