Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
ProjectProgramme / project reportUkraine: Project Highlights - OSRO/UKR/038/GER 2025
Also available in:
No results found.The Government of Germany contributed USD 900 000 to improve the livelihoods and food security of 1 008 rural households (2 260 people) and 250 small-scale producers. -
ProjectProgramme / project reportUkraine: Project Highlights - OSRO/UKR/213/GER 2025
Also available in:
No results found.Germany contributed USD 5 144 034 to safeguard livestock assets and protect livelihoods in frontline oblasts in Ukraine. -
ProjectProgramme / project reportUkraine: Project Highlights - OSRO/UKR/214/MDF 2025
Also available in:
No results found.The Minderoo Foundation contributed USD 3 million to strengthen Ukraine’s national storage capacity and safeguard the grain and oilseed harvests of war-affected farming households and agricultural producers.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
-
-
Book (series)Technical reportReport of the Eighth FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species
Bangkok, 7–11 July 2025 and Rome, 21–25 July 2025
2025Also available in:
No results found.The Eighth FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species was convened in response to the agreement by the Twenty-Fifth Session of the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI) on the Terms of Reference for an expert advisory panel for assessment of proposals to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and following endorsement from the Twenty-Sixth Session of COFI to convene the Expert Panel for relevant proposals to future CITES Conference of the Parties. The objectives of the Expert Panel were to i) assess each proposal from a scientific perspective in accordance with the CITES biological listing criteria (Resolution Conf. 9.24 [Rev. CoP17]); and ii) comment, as appropriate, on technical aspects of the proposal in relation to biology, ecology, trade and management issues, as well as, to the extent possible, the likely effectiveness for conservation.