Thumbnail Image

Agricultural trade liberalization in the Doha round. Alternative scenarios and strategic interactions between developed and developing countries

Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper No. 10.

Year of publication 2004

Pages 26

Author Luca Salvatici, Piero Conforti ;Trade and Markets Division

Product type Book (stand-alone)

Series title FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper

Edition 1

Synopsis (short abstract) The paper explores the impact of an agricultural trade agreement, simulating alternative liberalization scenarios, and studying the outcomes of the interaction between the strategies of country groups in the negotiations. The analysis is based on the model of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), and on the related version 5.4 database. Scenarios are run on a 2013 baseline, built by taking into account a number of events that have affected (and will further affect) world agricultural markets up to that period, focusing on the effects that are specifically attributable to further trade liberalization in the Doha Round. The policy strategies analyzed are two liberalization scenarios based on the proposals made in the present round of agricultural negotiations in terms of market access and export competition, plus a free agricultural trade benchmark scenario. Simulations are employed to study the interactions between the possible strategies of two wide country groups – developed and d eveloping countries on the basis of game theory, and to search for mutually advantageous agreements to be compared with actual agreement hypotheses. Results indicate that welfare gains could be reaped both by developed and developing countries and the possibility of inter-country compensations would allow, at least in principle, an agreement to be reached.

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • No Thumbnail Available
    Book (stand-alone)
    The Future of Preferential Trade Arrangements for Developing Countries and the Current Round of WTO Negotiations on Agriculture 2002
    Also available in:
    Trade preferences for developing countries have been a feature of industrialized countries’ commercial policies for nearly 40 years. However, with overall trade liberalization, tariff preferences are gradually losing importance. In agriculture, on the other hand, they can still be potentially valuable because MFN tariffs are extremely high in many cases, though they are also in the process of being reduced. Yet, because of the ‘sensitive’ nature of their agricultural policies, developed countrie s have usually been reluctant to provide deep preferences for agricultural products. At the same time, some special preferential regimes have provided significant concessions for selected agricultural products, for limited groups of developing countries. The EU’s preferences for sugar imports from selected ACP countries are a case in point. Hence the picture is very diverse when it comes to preferential treatment of agricultural exports from developing countries.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Book (stand-alone)
    AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND FOOD SECURITY: ISSUES AND OPTIONS IN THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
    Report and papers of an FAO Symposiumheld at Geneva on 23 - 24 September 1999. Vol. 1 Issues and options.
    2000
    Also available in:
    As part of its mandate to provide assistance to member countries for the follow-up to the Uruguay Round and future negotiations on agriculture, FAO has pursued a wide range of activities with a view to enhancing the capacity of member countries, particularly developing countries, to analyse the implications of the Uruguay Round Agreements for the agricultural sector, to adjust to the new trading environment and thus take advantage of trading opportunities, and to participate effectively in futur e multilateral trade negotiations. The 1996 World Food Summit Plan of Action commits FAO to continue assisting developing countries on trade issues and in particular
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    The impact of import surges: country case study results for Senegal and Tanzania
    FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper No. 11.
    2005
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    Measuring the impacts of import surges is a difficult task, but simple case studies illustrate some of the fundamental issues. From the two case studies examined in this paper, it was found that the impacts vary markedly in different settings and for different commodities. Thus, for example, while the negative impact on Senegal’s broiler industry came out clearly, import surges were not an issue in the case of dairy products. This was because dairy imports, although high, had increased steadily over a longer period of time and as a result the local industry had adjusted. In the case of Tanzania, some negative effects were found for the dairy sub-sector but only limited effects on poultry. In both countries, rapid growth in poultry imports also revealed the weaknesses of the domestic processing industry in competing with imported products, particularly in situations where there has been rapid growth in demand for further processed quality products by supermarkets and hotels which the lo cal industry has failed to supply.
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.