Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentJoint Evaluation of GCP/PHI/042/NET Sustainable Agrarian Reform Communities - Technical Support to Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (FAO/SARC-TSSARD) 2001
Also available in:
No results found.The evaluation was intended "as the Project draws to a close, to provide recommendations to the Governments of the Netherlands and the Philippines and to FAO on further steps necessary to consolidate progress and ensure achievement of the objectives". Further needs for external assistance were to be identified, bearing in mind that the Government of Australia has already begun to examine the possibilities for its eventual support to the programme". -
Book (series)Evaluation of the project “FAO support to the Georgian agricultural sector (European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development [ENPARD III])”
Project code: GCP/GEO/011/EC
2023Also available in:
No results found.This document is a terminal evaluation of the project “FAO support to the Georgian agricultural sector (European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development [ENPARD III])”. The project was funded under the third phase of the European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (ENPARD III) and implemented in Georgia from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2022. The evaluation’s aim was to assess the overall achievement of the project objectives and outcomes, to evaluate the project’s success, identify good implementation practices, drawbacks, and lessons learned, and to renew the linkages to other projects and partnerships or arrangements in place that have contributed to the adequate implementation of project activities.The evaluation covered the whole project implementation period, including three main areas of concern: i) capacity development of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture (MEPA); ii) grant support to farmers/agricultural companies; and iii) technical support to famers. A systematic and objective assessment was made of the project design, the project’s implementation and its results in order to determine the project’s relevance and achievement of objectives, but also its efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. The evaluation was theory-based and used a utilization-focused and participatory approach. The assessment applied a qualitative approach to collect the data, and utilized the following tools: i) desk review; ii) interviews with project stakeholders; iii) focus group discussions with project end beneficiaries; and iv) field visits to project sites. -
DocumentEvaluation of Control of Foot and Mouth Disease in the Philippines GCP/PHI/041/AUL (Consolidation Phase)
Report of the Evaluation Mission
2001Also available in:
No results found.The following draft represents the views of the independent evaluation mission on the performance and achievements of the Control of Foot and Mouth Disease in the Philippines (CFMDP) project. The project began its first phase in 1996; following an independent technical review and in line with the recommendation of a Tripartite Review, a consolidation phase was approved in 1999. The present evaluation focuses mainly on this phase of the project.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.