Thumbnail Image

Drivers and stressors of resilience to food insecurity – Evidence from 35 countries

Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 21-09

Year of publication 2021

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 48 p.

Author d’Errico, M.; Pinay, J.; Luu, A.; Jumbe, E. 

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Book (series)

ISBN 978-92-5-135227-4

Series title FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper

Series number 21-09

Edition 1

Synopsis (short abstract) Resilience is often associated with multivalued and multi-faceted strategies, programs, and projects. After approximately 15 years of empirical evidence in the literature, few research questions remain unexplored and unanswered, especially with the recent occurrence of a global pandemic. In this paper, we are assessing whether there are few and consistently relevant elements that determine resilience capacity as well as investigating which shocks are most dramatically reducing resilience. We also investigate which coping strategies are most frequently adopted in the presence of shocks. Our results show that diversification of income sources, education, access to land, livestock, and agricultural inputs, are the main drivers of households’ resilience capacity. Moreover, the most prevailing shocks are found to be natural, health and livelihood-related shocks. In addition to this, we show that reducing the quantity and quality of food consumed, seeking an extra job, selling assets, taking credit, relying on relatives and social networks are the most adopted coping strategies. Finally, we found that coping strategies are able to mitigate the adverse effects of shocks on resilience capacity; however, they are not sufficient to offset their long-term negative consequences. Our conclusion is that adequate investments in resilience are conditional to a) engaging with activities that are broadly consistent across countries and b) fine-tuning the interventions based on context-specificity.

This working paper has been developed as a background document for The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. Making agri-food systems more resilient to shocks and stresses.

Cite this content as:

d’Errico, M., Pinay, J., Luu, A. & Jumbe, E. 2021. Drivers and stressors of resilience to food insecurity – Evidence from 35 countries. Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 21-09. Rome, FAO.

https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7411en

Read on Google Books and buy online

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Climate resilience pathways of rural households: Evidence from Ethiopia 2018
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    Climate variability and extreme events continue to impose significant challenges to households, particularly to those that are less resilient. By exploring the resilience capacity of rural Ethiopian households after the drought shock occurred in 2011, using panel data, this paper shows important socio-economic and policy determinants of households’ resilience capacity. Three policy indications emerge from the analysis. First, government support programmes, such as the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP), appear to sustain households’ resilience by helping them to reach the level of pre-shock total consumption, but have no impact on the food-consumption resilience. Secondly, the “selling out assets strategy” affects positively households’ resilience, but only in terms of food consumption – not total consumption. Finally, the presence of informal institutions, such as social networks providing financial support, sharply increases households’ resilience by helping them to reach preshock levels of both food consumption and total consumption.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    The resilience of domestic transport networks in the context of food security – A multi-country analysis
    Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2021
    2021
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    Transport infrastructure and logistics, not least domestic food transport networks, are an integral part of agrifood systems, and play a fundamental role in ensuring physical access to food. However, the resilience of these networks has rarely been studied. This study fills this gap and analyses the structure of food transport networks for a total of 90 countries, as well as their resilience through a set of indicators. Findings show that where food is transported more locally and where the network is denser, systematic disturbances have a much lower impact. This is mostly the case for high-income countries, as well as for densely populated countries like China, India, Nigeria and Pakistan. Conversely, low-income countries have much lower levels of transport network resilience, although some exceptions exist. The study further simulates the effect of potential disruptions – namely floods – to food transport networks in three countries. The simulation illustrates the loss of network connectivity that results when links become impassable, potentially affecting millions of people. Overall, this study provides a first geospatial framework to represent and model national food transport network resilience at a global scale considering not only local production and consumption, but also international trade. It has established a new toolkit for measuring resilience, which promises further use and applications beyond this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Policy brief
    Record reporting as 34 African countries track resilience to food insecurity shocks 2024
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    This policy brief outlines the African Union Commission’s (AUC) progress in tracking resilience to food insecurity, climate variability, and other shocks under the Malabo Declaration. With support from FAO and its digital Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis tool (e-RIMA), resilience reporting advanced from only 8 African countries in 2019 to 34 in 2023. Commitment 6 of the Malabo Declaration focuses on enhancing resilience of livelihoods and production systems to climate variability and other shocks, aiming to meet the 2025 goal of making 30 percent of these households resilient to shocks. Resilience is assessed using three main indicators: the first is household resilience capacity (measured as a percentage), which is the indicator discussed in this policy brief, as well as indicators on sustainable land management, and on public spending on resilience-building initiatives. On average across the reporting countries, 56 percent of households have enhanced resilience, with North Africa scoring the highest at 74 percent and Southern Africa the lowest at 36 percent. Key factors driving resilience include access to basic services, household assets, adaptive capacity, and social-safety nets, with each region showing varied strengths across these pillars. The policy brief, prepared by the Agrifood Economics and Policy Division at FAO, recommends continued technical support and capacity building for further resilience reporting, aiming to include more countries in the next Biennial Review in 2025 to help measure and track country resilience to food insecurity from a variety of climate and socioeconomic shocks.
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.