Thumbnail Image

Impact of the 2016/17 drought on Somali livestock keepers











Otte, J., Akilu, Y., Wisser, D., Rajagopalan, P. & Zaidi, Z. 2023. Impact of the 2016/17 drought on Somali livestock keepers. FAO Statistics Working Paper Series, No. 23-37. Rome, FAO.



Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    Anticipatory actions to mitigate the impact of drought on agricultural livelihoods in acutely food-insecure rural areas of Afghanistan
    Project fact sheet
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The project, Anticipatory actions to mitigate the impact of drought on agricultural livelihoods in acutely food-insecure rural areas of Afghanistan – OSRO/AFG/123/CHG is assisting 119 000 number of people in 4 provinces, by using the following assistance modalities: Livestock Protection, Home gardening, Training, and COVID-19.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Policy brief
    Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings: Evidence from Somalia
    Policy brief
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This brief summarizes the evidence on the impacts of FAO 'Cash plus agricultural inputs' program in Somalia on food security, adoption of agricultural practices, wealth and productive assets.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings
    The case of Somalia
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This study examines the FAO cash plus agriculture program in Somalia. This multi-faceted intervention provides agricultural inputs, training and cash transfers to vulnerable agro-pastoralist households living in districts and villages that experienced severe weather shocks. We exploit variations in the implementation of this program to assess the effect of receiving inputs only and inputs plus cash on a range of protective and productive outcomes. Specifically, we make use of household survey data collected in 2019 and apply a quasi-experimental Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Analysis (IPWRA) matching approach to estimate the impact of the two different interventions on food security, assets, adoption of inputs and adoption of agricultural practices. We find positive and significant impacts on a number of productive outcomes and some difference between the two treatments: while inputs seem to increase asset wealth, cash plus reduces food insecurity and higher levels of income diversification, suggesting that the cash component facilitates investments in livelihoods diversification. Moreover, we find evidence of heterogeneous impacts under conditions of weather shocks, and between socio-economic segments of the population.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.