Thumbnail Image

Evaluation of FAO’s Asia Regional Integrated Pest Management and Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme in the Greater Mekong Subregion

Project code: GCP/RAS/229/SWE

Copyright licence

Year of publication 2020

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 85 p.

Author FAO

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Book (series)

Category Evaluation report

ISBN 978-92-5-132229-1

Series title Project Evaluation Series

Series number feb/20

To cite or share https://doi.org/10.4060/ca7783en

Synopsis (short abstract) Chemical production, use and disposal will continue to increase worldwide; assessments and forecasts predict that global chemical sales will grow by about 3 percent per year until 2050, the major part of which will take place in Asia. South-East Asian countries in particular have shown strong industrial growth in agriculture during the last two decades. Many countries in Southeast Asia lack the capacity to handle chemicals management issues and are in great need to develop institutions, legislation, knowledge and general awareness. The countries face many challenges in the area of chemicals management, in particular pesticide governance. The intensive and often insufficiently controlled use of pesticides in the large agriculture sector is a major part of the issue. The programme “Towards a Non-Toxic Environment in South-East Asia” was designed and funded by Sida and coordinated by KemI. It was implemented in association with the FAO RAP; PAN-AP and TFA, which aimed to reduce health and environmental risks by monitoring, regulating and managing agricultural, industrial and consumer chemicals around the . This evaluation assessed the role and contributions of FAO against the programme outcome-level results: (i) strengthened regulatory framework for the control and registration of pesticides; and (ii) adoption and economic benefits of the community-level Farmer Field School (FFS) activities in all partner countries within Phase II (from 2013 to 2018. In addition, the evaluation assessed FAO’s work on gender mainstreaming, communication and follow-up actions taken in response to the 2016 mid-term evaluation.

Annex 1. Terms of reference

Annex 3. Evaluation Matrix

Management response

Cite this content as:

FAO. 2020. Evaluation of FAO’s Asia Regional Integrated Pest Management and Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Project Evaluation Series, 02/2020. Rome. 

https://doi.org/10.4060/ca7783en

Read on Google Books and buy online

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation report
    Évaluation du projet «Prévenir les conflits intercommunautaires et contribuer à la consolidation de la paix à travers le développement d’un pastoralisme résilient dans la zone transfrontalière de Diffa et du Kanem (Niger/Tchad)»
    UNJP/NER/062/PBF-UNJP/CHD/048/PBF
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    L'évaluation contribue à l'apprentissage institutionnel et à l’amélioration programmatique en tirant les leçons des projets de consolidation de la paix des Nations Unies (financés par le Fonds pour la consolidation de la paix). L’évaluation a examiné le processus de mise en œuvre du projet et les résultats en matière de consolidation de la paix.Le projet a produit des effets encourageants et tangibles qui laissent augurer que les populations épouseront à l'avenir des comportements et attitudes favorables au dialogue et à la gestion pacifique des conflits. Compte tenu du succès des clubs Dimitra, leur mise en place dans un plus grand nombre de villages permettrait de mettre en place des réseaux qui pourraient avoir un impact sur d’autres types de problématiques.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Evaluation report
    Evaluación del Programa de Cooperación de la FAO en Nicaragua
    Evaluación Programa País - Informe de Evaluación
    2018
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    El objetivo de la evaluación fue el de valorar el posicionamiento estratégico y contribución de FAO a los resultados obtenidos en el periodo 2013-2016 en Nicaragua basándose el Marco de Programación País (MPP) vigente. La evaluación tomo en cuenta la reducción presupuestaria notable que sufrió el programa debido a los cambios en la dinámica de la cooperación al desarrollo y la naturaleza del acompañamiento requerido para contextualizar los hallazgos y formular recomendaciones. El modelo de asistencia técnica de la FAO en Nicaragua ha evolucionado de acuerdo con las condiciones en el país y a partir del 2013 inicia un proceso de reestructuración en la organización y modalidad de gestión centrada en el acompañamiento técnico hacia políticas públicas. Las instituciones a la cual FAO acompañó reconocen su contribución a los logros obtenidos al igual que a su habilidad en atender las diversas solicitudes de apoyo. FAO es valorada como una agencia líder en los temas de alimentación y agricultura en Nicaragua. Su posición le ha permitido incidir en políticas de relevancia para el desarrollo de la agricultura familiar y fortalecimiento de capacidades a diversos niveles.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Booklet
    Corporate general interest
    Emissions due to agriculture
    Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018
    2021
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The FAOSTAT emissions database is composed of several data domains covering the categories of the IPCC Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector of the national GHG inventory. Energy use in agriculture is additionally included as relevant to emissions from agriculture as an economic production sector under the ISIC A statistical classification, though recognizing that, in terms of IPCC, they are instead part of the Energy sector of the national GHG inventory. FAO emissions estimates are available over the period 1961–2018 for agriculture production processes from crop and livestock activities. Land use emissions and removals are generally available only for the period 1990–2019. This analytical brief focuses on overall trends over the period 2000–2018.
Show more