Thumbnail Image

Evaluation of FAO's country programme in the Sudan (2017–2021)













Annex 1. Terms of reference

Management response


FAO. 2023. Evaluation of FAO’s country programme in the Sudan (2017–2021). Country Programme Evaluation Series, 03/2023. Rome.



Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation report
    Review of FAO’s country programme in Eritrea 2017–2021 2021
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    In 2020, the FAO Office of Evaluation (OED) backstopped the FAO Eritrea Office in the review of the FAO Country Programme. This is the first review of the Eritrea Country Programme and covers the Country Programming Framework (CPF) period from 2017 to 2021.The review assessed FAO’s strategic positioning in Eritrea, the programme results and provided strategic recommendations on how FAO can better realign its programme to evolving needs. The review found that while the Ministry of Agriculture and the Minitry of Marine Resources fully participated in the formulation of the CPF, the Ministry of Land, Water and the Environment’s participation was limited. Overall, the results are unequal across the three priority areas of the CPF. The review makes thirteen recommendations. This includes FAO enhancing its cooperation with the Ministry of Marine Resources and the Ministry of Land, Water and the Environment. More specifically, both ministries should also be involved in the preparation of the next CPF.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation report
    Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to Jordan 2017–2021 2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The Jordan country programme evaluation covered the period 2017–2021. The evaluation assessed FAO's strategic positioning, operational and organizational capacity, contributions, partnerships and normative values. It also identified key lessons learned and recommendations to inform the next Country Programming Framework.The evaluation found evidence of sustainable results in FAO Jordan: FAO’s programme in Jordan responded to beneficiaries’ needs considering global and country development and humanitarian priorities. FAO is working in accordance with its comparative advantage and is recognized as a trusted source of technical knowledge and advice. It has carried out actions in Jordan to i) influence decision-making, national stakeholders and partners; ii) support and formulate strategies and policies; and iii) build the national capacity.Recommendations were drawn up to enhance the quality of FAO’s programme design, support the formulation, uptake and implementation of policy development, strengthen capacity building efforts to be more sustainable, develop a partnership strategy to guide the collaboration with various partners, enhance the country office capacity and ensure an adequate institutional setup for gender and conflict sensitivity mainstreaming.
  • Thumbnail Image

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

  • Thumbnail Image
    Booklet
    High-profile
    FAO Strategy on Climate Change 2022–2031 2022
    The FAO Strategy on Climate Change 2022–2031 was endorsed by FAO Council in June 2022. This new strategy replaces the previous strategy from 2017 to better FAO's climate action with the Strategic Framework 2022-2031, and other FAO strategies that have been developed since then. The Strategy was elaborated following an inclusive process of consultation with FAO Members, FAO staff from headquarters and decentralized offices, as well as external partners. It articulates FAO's vision for agrifood systems by 2050, around three main pillars of action: at global and regional level, at country level, and at local level. The Strategy also encourages key guiding principles for action, such as science and innovation, inclusiveness, partnerships, and access to finance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation report
    Évaluation du programme de pays de la FAO au Niger
    Serie Évaluation de programme par pays
    2016
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Cette évaluation fait partie d’une série d’Évaluations des programmes de pays (EPP) conduites par le Bureau de l’évaluation de la FAO. La finalité principale d’une EPP est de contribuer à mieux orienter le programme de la FAO au niveau d’un pays, afin de le rendre plus pertinent aux besoins de ce dernier, et de renforcer l’impact des efforts de l’Organisation vers la réalisation des Objectifs mondiaux des États membres: i) éliminer la faim, l’insécurité alimentaire et la malnutrition; ii) élimin er la pauvreté et favoriser le progrès social et économique pour tous; et iii) gérer et utiliser de manière durable les ressources naturelles. Les résultats de l’évaluation contribueront à informer le processus de développement du nouveau cycle du CPP du Niger qui démarrera à la mi-2016.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Booklet
    Evaluation report
    Evaluation of the project “Integrated Country Approach for boosting decent jobs for youth in the agrifood system” Phase III (2019–2023)
    Project code: GCP/INT/335/MUL
    2024
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The evaluation highlights the project's strong alignment with national priorities and FAO objectives, effectively addressing the needs of youth organizations and rural youth. It successfully enhanced the capacity of youth in agrifood systems, including agricultural production, digital and financial literacy, and marketing. While progress was made in developing agricultural value chains, further improvement is needed by adopting a strategic market systems approach. The ICA project fostered multistakeholder engagement, strengthening sustainability through national collaboration. However, challenges remain, particularly in access to finance for young agripreneurs and the need for tailored interventions to support diverse youth needs. The evaluation recommends: i) Adopting a strategic market systems approach for sustained systemic change; ii) Continuing a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach to provide comprehensive support to youth; iii) Implementing a two-stage targeting strategy, starting with youth structures and then focusing on individuals, ensuring inclusion of vulnerable groups; iv) Developing an exit strategy that ensures long-term sustainability in countries not continuing in future project phases; v) Establishing a comprehensive results framework and monitoring system for all ICA country projects.