Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
ArticleCarbon emissions and removals from forests: new estimates, 1990–2020 2021
Also available in:
No results found.National, regional and global CO2 emissions and removals from forests were estimated for the period 1990–2020 using as input the country reports of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. The new Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates, based on a simple carbon stock change approach, update published information on net emissions and removals from forests in relation to (a) net forest conversion and (b) forest land. Results show a significant reduction in global emissions from net forest conversion over the study period, from a mean of 4.3 in 1991–2000 to 2.9 Gt CO2 yr−1 in 2016–2020. At the same time, forest land was a significant carbon sink globally but decreased in strength over the study period, from −3.5 to −2.6 Gt CO2 yr−1. Combining net forest conversion with forest land, our estimates indicated that globally forests were a small net source of CO2 to the atmosphere on average during 1990–2020, with mean net emissions of 0.4 Gt CO2 yr−1. The exception was the brief period 2011–2015, when forest land removals counterbalanced emissions from net forest conversion, resulting in a global net sink of −0.7 Gt CO2 yr−1. Importantly, the new estimates allow for the first time in the literature the characterization of forest emissions and removals for the decade just concluded, 2011–2020, showing that in this period the net contribution of forests to the atmosphere was very small, i.e., a sink of less than −0.2 Gt CO2 yr−1 – an estimate not yet reported in the literature. This near-zero balance was nonetheless the result of large global fluxes of opposite sign, namely net forest conversion emissions of 3.1 Gt CO2 yr−1 counterbalanced by net removals on forest land of −3.3 Gt CO2 yr−1. Finally, we compared our estimates with data independently reported by countries to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change, indicating close agreement between FAO and country emissions and removals estimates. Data from this study are openly available via the Zenodo portal (Tubiello, 2020), with DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3941973, as well as in the FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database) emissions database (FAO, 2021a). -
BookletEstimating emissions and removals from forest degradation
An overview of country experience
2023Also available in:
No results found.Estimating emissions and removals from forest degradation is important, though challenging, for many countries. Where forest degradation is a major source of emissions, governments want to cover it when reporting on their mitigation efforts. However, estimating emissions from forest degradation is hard. There are major challenges to accurately estimating emissions from degradation, such as defining forest degradation and setting the scope for estimating carbon stock changes, detecting and monitoring degradation using earth observation data, and estimating associated emissions and removals from field observation results. This booklet provides an overview of the methodological options available to countries to address these challenges while collecting the emerging experience of dozens of countries that have already reported on emissions from forest degradation internationally. The authors attempt to summarize country experiences in estimating carbon stock changes from forest degradation and their methodological options. -
ArticleComparative study on the efficacy of biobased wood preservative over conventional wood preservatives against fungi and termites
XV World Forestry Congress, 2-6 May 2022
2022Also available in:
No results found.The current focus of wood preservation research is on developing wood preservatives from natural and environmentally compatible compounds for industrial application. Liquefaction of wood is one of the promising approaches to utilize woody waste where the wood meal is converted into a chemically active liquid with the help of a liquefying agent like polyhydric alcohols, phenol, cresol, and plant-based solvent as CNSL and Cardanol. Conventional wood preservatives like CCA, ASCU, Creosote, Chlorpyriphos based temic and termisel as synthetic chemicals were in use for a long time, has also been used in prescribed proportion. The efficacy and economic suitability of liquefied wood as a wood preservative along with conventional wood preservative against termite and fungi have been studied. Wood samples were impregnated with both conventional and liquefied wood diluted with methanol and were subjected and evaluated as per Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) in terms of its antifungal (IS4873, Part I:2008) and termiticidal activities (IS4833:1993) accelerated termite graveyard test and fungal resistance test. The level of impregnation of liquefied wood in wood was estimated by determining the weight percent gain. In the graveyard test, samples were periodically observed for 24 months. The results indicated that Samples treated with phenol-assisted liquefied wood, CNSL based wood polyols, Cardanol based polyols exhibited better results as compare to conventional synthetic wood preservatives both in visual observation and percentage weight loss as compare to initial condition and untreated control samples. The percentage weight loss of liquefied wood polyols (phenol, CNSL, and cardanol individually) treated wood sample was ranging from only 5-20% of its initial weight; wood treated with preservatives (CCA, ASCU, Creosote and chlorpyriphos) shows % weight loss varied from 40- 60% and did not exhibit better resistance against termite and fungi as compared to the untreated samples. The treated samples were also exposed to fungus for 16 weeks. The fungicidal traits of liquefied wood polyols (phenolated, CNSL, and cardanol individually) treated wood showed higher antifungal efficacy against both white rot and brown rot of wood, conventionally wood treated preservatives (CCA, ASCU, Creosote and chlorpyriphos) shows low efficacy against termite and fungus. Since wood residue is a byproduct of primary and secondary wood processing industry whereas CNSL and Cardanol are by-products of Cashewnut processing unit, so its utilization as wood preservatives will be a value-added product to the wood-based Industry... Keywords: Preservatives, Impregnation, Liquefied wood, antifungal ID: 3625875
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.