Thumbnail Image

Climate Change, Food Security and Insurance Systems for Family Farming

Brazil case: Climate, income and price insurance programs.








Also available in:

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Project
    Technical Assistance to Develop GCF Climate Resilience Project in Kagera and Geita Regions of Tanzania - TCP/URT/3708 2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania estimates that nearly 35 percent of households in Kagera and Geita regions lives below the basic needs poverty line, with some districts within these regions ranked among the poorest in the country Most production is for subsistence, with farmers’ households generally living season to season, with very small risk margins and little resilience to weather and climate related shocks Agriculture, including the crops and livestock subsector contributes over 87 percent of the country’s regional Gross Domestic Product ( Of the total population of approximately 4 million in the regions, more than 3 5 million residents rely on agriculture for their livelihoods Almost all agriculture and farming in the regions is rainfed and climate change has been intensifying the variability of rainfall patterns, affecting the sector seriously The profound impacts of climate change in Kagera and Geita regions are already causing relatively more intense and wider damage to at risk communities and agro ecosystems, compared with other regions in the country.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Taking stock: what we grow together counts
    A practical guide for family farmers and their associations to develop a planted forest inventory
    2021
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Smallholder farmers are commonly thought of as farmers who manage two hectares of land or less. By some estimates they represent approximately a quarter of the world’s population, and manage half of the world’s arable land; they generate billions of dollars in forest and timber products. Collectively, smallholders have the transformative potential to achieve sustainable development and respond to climate change at landscape scales. In order to achieve this collective action, smallholders can and do organize themselves into organizations such as associations and cooperatives, i.e. forest and farm producer organizations (FFPOs). Empowering forest and farm producer organizations will be critical to delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for mitigating climate change as part of the Paris Agreement. This document has three main premises: first, that smallholders’ farms are businesses, and the decisions that smallholders make about their farms are primarily based on their expected return on investments. The second premise is that the business of growing trees on farms can increase family farmers’ economic resilience and improve the net environmental impact of family farming. The third premise is that small farmers’ business of growing trees will be more economically successful if they can organize themselves to achieve scale. What follows from these premises is the purpose of this document: supporting producer organizations to collect information on their tree assets (i.e. trees grown on their farms) for commercial purposes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    An In-Depth Review of the Evolution of Integrated Public Policies to Strengthen Family Farms in Brazil
    ESA Working Paper 15-01, July 2015
    2015
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    From 2003, the Zero Hunger Program and subsequently, in 2011, the Brazil Without Poverty Plan, marked a deliberate convergence of the purposes and actions focused on farmers and family farmers in Brazil. This allowed simultaneous access to social policies and polices focused on agriculture and livestock activities, through a permanent set of public policies, such as rural credit, climate and income insurance, technical assistance and commercialization. This happened in parallel to affirmative ac tions related to gender, ethnicity and rural youth. To deal with such complex themes such as eradicating hunger and extreme poverty, the Federal Government began to integrate traditionally independent actions and programs. The creation of institutional markets focused on family farming, such as the Program for Purchase of Food (PAA) and the National Program for School Meals (PNAE), is an example of combining public policies, such as social assistance, education, agriculture and land development. The creation of this integrated program was only made possible by the coordination and the strong commitment towards joint efforts by federal ministries and bodies, as well as the effective participation of state and municipal governments. The constant presence of organized civil society, with its councils and forums, and of the organized movements in the rural, helped to correct and increase the actions, and conferring legitimacy to the programs.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.