Thumbnail Image

Strengthening Inclusive Sustainable Economic Growth in the Agriculture Sector to Promote Food and Nutrition Security, Income Generation and Alleviation of Poverty - TCP/PNG/3704







Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    The contribution of public investment in the agricultural sector to economic growth and rural poverty reduction
    A high-level dialogue in Nicaragua based on a prospective analysis
    2020
    Also available in:

    In 2018, the government of Nicaragua requested technical assistance from FAO to carry out a prospective analysis of the Nicaraguan economy and the evolution of rural poverty, in the context of the restrictive economic conditions experienced in the country that year. Thus, the FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) in Rome, together with the FAO Country Office in Nicaragua (FAONI) and in close coordination and support with the country’s Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (MHCP), the Central Bank of Nicaragua (BCN) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MAG), developed the study “Analysis of alternative ways of public investment and its impact on economic growth, agriculture and poverty reduction in Nicaragua.” This analysis generated quantitative evidence on the impact of agriculture on economic growth and poverty reduction. The results are clear: in all simulated scenarios, it was verified that an increase – by a value of 0.5 or 1 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) – of public investment in the agricultural sector generates economic growth, which is reflected, among other things, in GDP growth that varies between 0.8 and 3.5 percent annually through 2030 depending on the scenario. Moreover, it is observed that the difference in the total poverty rate in rural areas with respect to the base scenario would range between 0.5 and 2.25 percentage points in the same period, depending on the agricultural investment scenario. With regard to extreme poverty, the difference is projected to be between 0.16 and 0.31 points. The ongoing high-level dialogue and collaboration between FAO and Nicaragua’s economic and fiscal policy-making authorities is an excellent example, which should be replicated elsewhere, of how FAO can influence a country’s public policies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation of the project "Agriculture for Economic Growth and Food Security/Nutrition to mitigate migration flows"
    Project code: GCP/GAM/040/EC
    2023
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This terminal evaluation reviews the "Agriculture for Economic Growth and Food Security/Nutrition to mitigate migration flows” project. The objective of the project was to “Contribute to inclusive and equitable sustainable growth in the agricultural sector and reduce food insecurity and malnutrition to mitigate migration flows to Europe”. The project was pivotal in supporting the first-ever key policies such as the National Cooperative Policy which was a necessity in the agriculture sector and laid the foundation for the development of strong policies and strategic plans (the national extension policy, the national seed policy) that enhanced the institutional capacities. FAO reinforced the national capacities by supporting institutions at all levels, including capacity development, to prepare, implement, monitor, and evaluate evidence-based policies and programmes, and leverage investments. The project enhanced the participation of various agriculture value chain actors that contributed to the structuring of the value chain system to make it more responsive.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Science and technology for sustainable food security, nutritional adequacy, and poverty alleviation in the Asia-Pacific Region 2002
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Science and technology have played a vital role in keeping agricultural production a step ahead of rapid global population growth during the past four decades. However, Green Revolution technologies did not benefit the vast rainfed and other marginal areas with high concentrations of hunger and poverty. The new farming technologies were also not friendly to the environment, often resulting in degradation of land, water and biodiversity. The region needs to step up agricultural production by 80 p ercent by the year 2030 to meet its growing food needs. However, because there is very little room for expanding the area under farm cultivation most of this increase will need to come from making existing farmland more productive. This publication examines the agrobiophysical, socio-economic and environmental status of farming systems in Asia-Pacific and the role that science and technology will be called on to play in “breaking the unholy alliance of hunger, poverty and environmental degradati on”.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.