Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
DocumentProgrammingLAO PDR: FAO Country Programming Framework for LAO PDR 2013-2015 2013
Also available in:
No results found.The Country Programming Framework (CPF) is the tool used by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to define its medium-term response to the assistance needs of member countries in pursuit of national development objectives that are consistent with the FAO Strategic Framework and Regional Priorities, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and other Internationally Agreed Development Goals (IADGs) and strategic objectives of the United Nations Development Assistance Fr amework (UNDAF). It replaces the National Medium-term Priority Framework (NMTPF) as the FAO planning instrument. The CPF for the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) outlines the joint Government of Lao PDR (GOL) and FAO medium-term priorities for FAO’s technical assistance over the period 2013-2015. It was formulated by a joint national and international team through a process of literature review, semi-structured interviews with key resource persons from GOL, FAO, other UN agencies, othe r development partners and civil society. Successive drafts of the document have benefited from the comments of GOL and FAO’s national, regional and headquarters offices.- Read the Summary version
-
DocumentProgrammingRepublic of Azerbaijan: FAO Country Programming Framework in the Republic of Azerbaijan 2013-2015. Executive summary 2016
Also available in:
No results found. -
DocumentProgrammingLAO PDR: FAO Country Programming Framework for LAO PDR 2016 to 2021
Final Draft for Government Review
2016Also available in:
No results found.This Country Programming Framework (CPF) sets out three (3) government priority areas to guide FAO partnership and support to the Government of Liberia – bringing together innovative international good practices and global standards with national and regional expertise during the next four (4) years, from 2016 to 2019. It is informed by the Liberia Agriculture Transformation Agenda (LATA), which is aligned with the national development framework – the Agenda for Transformation (AfT). The CPF is developed in accordance with LATA, consisting key development priorities as reflected in the AfT. For instance, Pillar II of the AfT calls for the revitalization of the Liberian economy through increased agriculture production and productivity to ensure food security and poverty reduction especially amongst rural population including women and children. Both the LATA and AfT were developed based on consultations with various stakeholders including non-state actors such as the Donor Working Group (DWG), Civil Society Organization (CSO), women groups in agriculture, local authorities, farmers and farmer-based organizations, community-based organizations, several line ministries, agencies and commissions in Liberia.Read the:
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
Book (series)GuidelineDéveloppement de l’aquaculture. 4. Une approche écosystémique de l’aquaculture. 2011Les dimensions sociales et biophysiques des écosystèmes sont inextricablement liées de telle manière qu’un changement dans une seule dimension est très susceptible de générer un changement dans une autre. Bien que le changement est une conséquence naturelle des interactions complexes, il doit être surveillé et même géré si le taux et la direction du changement risquent de compromettre la résilience du système. “Une approche écosystémique de l’aquaculture (AEA) est une stratégie pou r l’intégration de l’activité dans l’écosystème élargi de telle sorte qu’elle favorise le développement durable, l’équité et la résilience de l’interconnexion des systèmes socio-écologiques.” Etant une stratégie, l’approche écosystémique de l’aquaculture (AEA) n’est pas ce qu’on a fait, mais plutôt comment on l’a fait. La participation des parties intéressées est à la base de la stratégie. L’AEA exige un cadre politique approprié dans lequel la stratégie se développe en plusieurs é tapes: (i) la portée et la définition des limites des écosystèmes et l’identification de la partie intéressée; (ii) l’identification des problèmes principaux; (iii) la hiérarchisation des problèmes; (iv) la définition des objectifs opérationnels; (v) l’élaboration d’un plan de mise en oeuvre; (vi) le processus de mise en oeuvre correspondant qui comprend le renforcement, le suivi et l’évaluation, et (vii) un critique des politiques à long terme. Toutes ces étapes sont informées par les meilleures connaissances disponibles. La mise en oeuvre de l’AEA exigera le renforcement des institutions et des systèmes de gestion associés de sorte qu’une approche intégrée du développement de l’aquaculture peut être mise en oeuvre et compte entièrement des besoins et des impacts d’autres secteurs. La clé sera de développer des institutions capables d’intégration, notamment en fonction des objectifs et des normes convenus. L’adoption généralisée d’une AEA exigera un couplag e plus étroit de la science, la politique et la gestion. Elle exige aussi que les gouvernements incluent l’AEA dans leurs politiques de développement de l’aquaculture, stratégies et plans de développement.
-
Brochure, flyer, fact-sheetBrochureJoint Programme on Gender Transformative Approaches for Food Security and Nutrition
2022 in Review
2023Also available in:
No results found.The 'JP GTA - 2022 In Review' offers a snapshot of the milestones, achievements and activities of the Joint Programme over the course of the past year, with links to articles, publications and event recordings. The report is structured along the four pillars of the JP GTA, with sections focusing on knowledge generation, country-level activities, capacity development and learning, and policy support and institutional engagement. The page on 'knowledge generation' offers an overview of resources published or facilitated by the JP GTA in 2022. Under 'country-level activities' readers will find a summary of the key activities and achievements of the Joint Programme in Ecuador and Malawi. The section on 'capacity development and learning' delves into the JP GTA’s initiatives to share lessons from the Programme and build colleagues' and partners' knowledge and skills. The final pages on 'policy support and institutional engagement' highlight major global and corporate initiatives supported by the JP GTA. -
Book (series)Technical reportPesticides residues in food 2010 - Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticides Residues REPORT 2010
Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, Italy, 21–30 September 2010
2011Also available in:
No results found.The annual Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues was held in Rome, Italy, from 21 to 30 September 2010. The FAO Panel of Experts had met in Preparatory Sessions from 16 to 20 September. The Meeting was held in pursuance of recommendations made by previous meetings and accepted by the governing bodies of FAO and WHO that studies should be undertaken jointly by experts to evaluat e possible hazards to humans arising from the occurrence of pesticide residues in foods. During the meeting the FAO Panel of Experts was responsible for reviewing pesticide use patterns (use of good agricultural practices), data on the chemistry and composition of the pesticides and methods of analysis for pesticide residues and for estimating the maximum residue levels that might occur as a result of the use of the pesticides according to good agricultural practices. The WHO Core Asse ssment Group was responsible for reviewing toxicological and related data and for estimating, where possible and appropriate, acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and acute reference doses (ARfDs) of the pesticides for humans. This report contains information on ADIs, ARfDs, maximum residue levels, and general principles for the evaluation of pesticides. The recommendations of the Joint Meeting, including further research and information, are proposed for use by Member governments of the respective agencies and other interested parties.