Thumbnail Image

Methodological guide to reduce carbon and water footprints in banana plantations

Year of publication 2018

Place of publication Rome, Italy ; San José, Costa Rica ;

Pages 140 p.

Author Vallejo Chaverri, A.L.; Vallejo Solís, M.A.; Nájera Fernández, J.; Garnier Zamora, L.A.;

Publisher FAO ; GIZ ;

Product type Book (stand-alone)

ISBN 978-92-5-130944-5

Synopsis (short abstract) The World Banana Forum (WBF) publication developed a methodological guide to reduce water and carbon footprints in banana plantations worldwide. Members of the Working Group (WG) on Sustainable Production Systems and Environmental Impact acknowledged the contribution of banana production in the total global GHG emissions and the consumption of freshwater in the economic activity, both stressed in the 2015 Paris Climate Conference (COP21), having the agricultural sector a high mitigation potential. Therefore, the WG wishes to contribute to the global fight against climate change and promote the sustainable use of natural resources, developing practical tools to strengthen the efforts of the global banana industry to reduce its carbon and water footprint (CWF). Since banana farmers are struggling to adapt to climate change, the project aims to mainstream and support the adoption of best climate-smart practices and efficient water management in the banana value chain as part of the environmental strategy of organizations. Efforts to promote CWF reduction programs in the banana industry are still incipient and carried out mostly by multinationals, due in part to the implementation costs, the complexity of the topic for farmers, the lack of user-friendly tools to measure them efficiently, and that is still a B2B-driven strategy not yet recognized by consumers. Even though the need for supporting carbon and water footprint analysis (CWF) in the banana industry remains strong, there is still an apparent lack of sufficient financial incentives by both the governments and the global market.

Read on Google Books and buy online

Language English

Also available in:

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Guide méthodologique des empreintes carbone et eau dans la production bananière 2025
    Also available in:
    Le Forum mondial de la banane a publié un guide méthodologique visant à réduire les empreintes carbone et eau des plantations de bananes à l’échelle mondiale. Les membres du Groupe de travail sur les systèmes de production durable et l’impact environnemental reconnaissent que la production bananière contribue aux émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre et à la consommation d’eau douce. Ces enjeux, mis en lumière lors de la Conférence de Paris sur le climat en 2015 (COP21), font du secteur agricole un levier essentiel pour l’atténuation du changement climatique. Dans cette perspective, le groupe de travail entend participer activement à la lutte contre le changement climatique et à la promotion d’une gestion durable des ressources naturelles. Il développe ainsi des outils pratiques pour renforcer les efforts de l’industrie bananière mondiale en matière de réduction de son empreinte carbone et eau. Face aux difficultés rencontrées par les producteurs de bananes pour s’adapter aux changements climatiques, ce projet vise à favoriser et soutenir l’adoption des meilleures pratiques agricoles adaptées au climat, ainsi qu’une gestion efficace de l’eau dans la chaîne de valeur de la banane, en cohérence avec les stratégies environnementales des organisations. Les initiatives visant à réduire l’empreinte carbone et eau dans l’industrie bananière restent encore limitées et sont principalement portées par des multinationales. Cette situation s’explique notamment par les coûts de mise en œuvre, la complexité du sujet pour les producteurs, le manque d’outils de mesure adaptés, ainsi que par le fait qu’il s’agit encore d’une approche peu connue des consommateurs. Bien que la nécessité d’analyser et de réduire les empreintes carbone et eau dans l’industrie bananière soit largement admise, les incitations financières restent insuffisantes, tant de la part des gouvernements que du marché mondial.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Using Marginal Abatement Cost Curves to Realize the Economic Appraisal of Climate Smart Agriculture Policy Options
    Analytical Tools. EASYPol Module116
    2012
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The AFOLU sector (Agriculture, Forestry, Land Use) is directly linked with climate change issues, on an environmental aspect as well as on an economical and social aspect (food security). Yet, while there is a wide range of technical solutions, it is not immediately apparent which options deliver the most economically efficient reductions in GHG within agriculture. This is why methodologies such as a Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC) have been developed over these past twenty years. MACC als o enables the comparison of the cost-effectiveness of mitigation options between different sectors (e.g. agriculture, power, transport, industry and domestic energy consumption). MACC has become a useful tool for policy makers to prioritize mitigation options. This paper aims at putting forward a methodology to use MAC-curves within the AFOLU sector. It especially targets policy planners and policy makers. The agricultural sector, also called agriculture or AFOLU, encompasses farm-based activiti es (crop production, livestock) as well as forestry and land use. It does not include the downstream agro-industry sector. The first part of these guidelines explains the methodology in order to assess the cost-effectiveness and the mitigation potential of technical practices in agriculture. It also underlines the limits of the MACC approach. The second part looks at a practical MACC analysis example, using the EX-ACT tool.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    Carbon footprint of the banana supply chain 2016
    Also available in:
    Due to the growth of agricultural production, FAO estimated that emissions from agriculture, forestry and fisheries have almost doubled over the past fifty years and could increase by 18% by 2030 and 30% by 2050 . Since the years 2000, this increase has mainly occurred in developing countries. Between 2001 and 2010, Asia (44%) and the Americas (26%) were the largest contributors to global emissions, followed by Africa (15%) and Europe (12%) . Agricultural production and land use change (defores tation) are responsible for most of agricultural GHG emissions, with respectively 50% and 38% of the emissions share in the sector. For the period 2001-2010, the largest emission source was agriculture followed by net forest conversion (38%), peat degradation (cultivation of organic soils and peat fires) (11%) and biomass fires (1%).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Guide méthodologique des empreintes carbone et eau dans la production bananière 2025
    Also available in:
    Le Forum mondial de la banane a publié un guide méthodologique visant à réduire les empreintes carbone et eau des plantations de bananes à l’échelle mondiale. Les membres du Groupe de travail sur les systèmes de production durable et l’impact environnemental reconnaissent que la production bananière contribue aux émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre et à la consommation d’eau douce. Ces enjeux, mis en lumière lors de la Conférence de Paris sur le climat en 2015 (COP21), font du secteur agricole un levier essentiel pour l’atténuation du changement climatique. Dans cette perspective, le groupe de travail entend participer activement à la lutte contre le changement climatique et à la promotion d’une gestion durable des ressources naturelles. Il développe ainsi des outils pratiques pour renforcer les efforts de l’industrie bananière mondiale en matière de réduction de son empreinte carbone et eau. Face aux difficultés rencontrées par les producteurs de bananes pour s’adapter aux changements climatiques, ce projet vise à favoriser et soutenir l’adoption des meilleures pratiques agricoles adaptées au climat, ainsi qu’une gestion efficace de l’eau dans la chaîne de valeur de la banane, en cohérence avec les stratégies environnementales des organisations. Les initiatives visant à réduire l’empreinte carbone et eau dans l’industrie bananière restent encore limitées et sont principalement portées par des multinationales. Cette situation s’explique notamment par les coûts de mise en œuvre, la complexité du sujet pour les producteurs, le manque d’outils de mesure adaptés, ainsi que par le fait qu’il s’agit encore d’une approche peu connue des consommateurs. Bien que la nécessité d’analyser et de réduire les empreintes carbone et eau dans l’industrie bananière soit largement admise, les incitations financières restent insuffisantes, tant de la part des gouvernements que du marché mondial.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Using Marginal Abatement Cost Curves to Realize the Economic Appraisal of Climate Smart Agriculture Policy Options
    Analytical Tools. EASYPol Module116
    2012
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The AFOLU sector (Agriculture, Forestry, Land Use) is directly linked with climate change issues, on an environmental aspect as well as on an economical and social aspect (food security). Yet, while there is a wide range of technical solutions, it is not immediately apparent which options deliver the most economically efficient reductions in GHG within agriculture. This is why methodologies such as a Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC) have been developed over these past twenty years. MACC als o enables the comparison of the cost-effectiveness of mitigation options between different sectors (e.g. agriculture, power, transport, industry and domestic energy consumption). MACC has become a useful tool for policy makers to prioritize mitigation options. This paper aims at putting forward a methodology to use MAC-curves within the AFOLU sector. It especially targets policy planners and policy makers. The agricultural sector, also called agriculture or AFOLU, encompasses farm-based activiti es (crop production, livestock) as well as forestry and land use. It does not include the downstream agro-industry sector. The first part of these guidelines explains the methodology in order to assess the cost-effectiveness and the mitigation potential of technical practices in agriculture. It also underlines the limits of the MACC approach. The second part looks at a practical MACC analysis example, using the EX-ACT tool.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Brochure, flyer, fact-sheet
    Carbon footprint of the banana supply chain 2016
    Also available in:
    Due to the growth of agricultural production, FAO estimated that emissions from agriculture, forestry and fisheries have almost doubled over the past fifty years and could increase by 18% by 2030 and 30% by 2050 . Since the years 2000, this increase has mainly occurred in developing countries. Between 2001 and 2010, Asia (44%) and the Americas (26%) were the largest contributors to global emissions, followed by Africa (15%) and Europe (12%) . Agricultural production and land use change (defores tation) are responsible for most of agricultural GHG emissions, with respectively 50% and 38% of the emissions share in the sector. For the period 2001-2010, the largest emission source was agriculture followed by net forest conversion (38%), peat degradation (cultivation of organic soils and peat fires) (11%) and biomass fires (1%).
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.