Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
-
Book (stand-alone)Technical book细胞基食品食用安全解析 2025
Also available in:
细胞基食品生产，即直接从细胞培养物中培育动物农产品，被认为是传统畜牧业系统的一个可持续的替代方案。随着商业化细胞基食品生产的不断扩大，解决消费者关心的最重要的问题之一——食品安全问题的紧迫性也随之增加。因此，联合国粮食及农业组织与世界卫生组织合作编写了本书，通过主动分享现有知识，与各成员和利益相关方接触，以确定具体方法，让消费者和所有其他利益相关方了解细胞基食品的食品安全考虑因素。本书包括相关术语问题、细胞基食品生产过程的原则和细胞基食品生产监管框架的全球状况的文献综述。其中包括以色列、卡塔尔和新加坡的案例研究，以凸显其细胞基食品监管框架的不同范围、架构和背景。本书的核心是粮农组织牵头的专家咨询会进行的全面食品安全危害识别结果，并以因果链的例子总结了所识别的危害。未来需要做的事情包括继续投资研究和开发，以了解是否能够实现提高可持续性的预期收益。在这方面，要密切观察细胞基食品在多大程度上与传统生产的食品存在差异。 -
MeetingMeeting document第二次筹备会议 - 暂定议程 2003
Also available in:
开幕词 - 通过本次会议议程 - 区域会议主题 - 全体会议和工作组会议将讨论的具体问题 - 寻找讨论文件的潜在作者 - 预算事项 - 其他事项 -
Book (series)Technical report渔业委员会鱼品贸易分委员会第十八届会议报告
2022年4月8日–5月8日，及6月7、8、9和20日，线上会议
2023Also available in:
分委员会第十八届会议于2022年4月8 日–5月8日，以及6月7、8、9和20日以线上方式举行。本文件为会议通过后报告并提供了关于会议的补充信息。
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
-
Policy briefPolicy briefOutcomes and lessons learned from the Koronivia UNFCCC negotiations on agriculture and food security, and the way forward after COP 27
Brief note
2023Also available in:
No results found.The Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) was established at COP23 to address six topics in the agricultural sector's role in climate change. KJWA has contributed to sharing scientific and technical knowledge, but limitations remain in translating outcomes into concrete climate actions. The new four-year joint work on the implementation of climate action on agriculture and food security, which prioritizes ending hunger and considers national circumstances, includes the creation of an online portal for sharing information. The four-year agenda is shaped and broadened through the submission of views by parties, observers, and civil society and will be considered by SBSTA and SBI in June 2023. -
Book (series)FlagshipThe State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023
Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum
2023This report provides an update on global progress towards the targets of ending hunger (SDG Target 2.1) and all forms of malnutrition (SDG Target 2.2) and estimates on the number of people who are unable to afford a healthy diet. Since its 2017 edition, this report has repeatedly highlighted that the intensification and interaction of conflict, climate extremes and economic slowdowns and downturns, combined with highly unaffordable nutritious foods and growing inequality, are pushing us off track to meet the SDG 2 targets. However, other important megatrends must also be factored into the analysis to fully understand the challenges and opportunities for meeting the SDG 2 targets. One such megatrend, and the focus of this year’s report, is urbanization. New evidence shows that food purchases in some countries are no longer high only among urban households but also among rural households. Consumption of highly processed foods is also increasing in peri-urban and rural areas of some countries. These changes are affecting people’s food security and nutrition in ways that differ depending on where they live across the rural–urban continuum. This timely and relevant theme is aligned with the United Nations General Assembly-endorsed New Urban Agenda, and the report provides recommendations on the policies, investments and actions needed to address the challenges of agrifood systems transformation under urbanization and to enable opportunities for ensuring access to affordable healthy diets for everyone. -
Book (stand-alone)Technical bookFood loss analysis: causes and solutions – The Republic of Uganda. Beans, maize, and sunflower studies 2019
Also available in:
No results found.This report illustrates the food loss assessment studies undertaken along the maize, sunflower and beans supply chains in Uganda in 2015-16 and 2016-17. They aimed to identify the critical loss points in the selected supply chains, the key stages at which food losses occur, why they occur, the extent and impact of food losses and the economic, social and environmental implications of the food losses. Furthermore, these studies also evaluated the feasibility of potential interventions to reduce food losses and waste.