References

Avey, P.C. & Desch, M.C. 2014. What do policymakers want from us? Results of a survey of current and former senior national security decision makers. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12111

Balvanera, P., Jacobs, S., Nagendra, H., O’Farrell, P., Bridgewater, P., Crouzat, E., Dendoncker, N. et al. 2020. The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people: challenges and opportunities. Ecosystems and People, 16(1): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1819426

Benton, T.G. 2023. Academics can do more to disrupt and reframe the solution space for food system transformation. Nature Food, 4(11): 928–930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00876-w

Borie, M., Gustafsson, K.M., Obermeister, N., Turnhout, E. & Bridgewater, P. 2020. Institutionalising reflexivity? Transformative learning and the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environmental Science & Policy, 110: 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.005

Campbell, B. M., Hagmann, J., Stroud, A., Thomas, R. & Wollenberg, E. 2006. Navigating amidst complexity: Guide to implementing effective research and development to improve livelihoods and the environment. Center for International Forestry Research. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02073

Caron, P., Ferrero Y De Loma-Osorio, G., Nabarro, D., Hainzelin, E., Guillou, M., Andersen, I., Arnold, T. et al. 2018. Food systems for sustainable development: proposals for a profound four-part transformation. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38(4): 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0519-1

Caron, P., Ferrero de Loma-Osorio, G., Ferroni, M., Lehmann, B., Mettenleiter, T.C. & Sokona, Y. 2022. Global food security: pool collective intelligence. Nature, 612 (7941): 631.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04471-0

Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. & Mitchell, R.B. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,100(14), 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100

Clapp, J., Lehmann, B., Moseley, W., Elver, H. & Webb, P. 2023. The I-TrACE principles for legitimate food systems science–policy–society interfaces. Nature Food, 4(2): 128–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00686-6

David-Benz, H., Sirdey, N., Deshons, A., Orbell, C. & Herlant, P. 2022. Conceptual framework and method for national and territorial assessments. Catalysing the sustainable and inclusive transformation of food systems. Rome, Montpellier, Bruxelles. FAO, CIRAD and European Union. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8603en

Davis, B., Mane, E., Gurbuzer, L.Y., Caivano, G., Piedrahita, N., Schneider, K., Azhar, N., Benali, M. et al. 2023. Estimating global and country-level employment in agrifood systems. FAO Statistics Working Paper Series, No. 23-34. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc4337en

Dekeyser, K., Rampa, F., D’Alessandro, C. & Bizzotto Molina, P. 2020. The food systems approach in practice: Our guide for sustainable transformation. Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management. https://ecdpm.org/work/the-food-systems-approach-in-practice-our-guide-for-sustainable-transformation

Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A. et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

Dinesh, D., Zougmore, R., Vervoort, J., Totin, E., Thornton, P., Solomon, D., Shirsath, P. et al. 2018. Facilitating change for climate-smart agriculture through science-policy engagement. Sustainability,10(8): 2616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082616

Dolinska, A., Hassenforder, E., Loboguerrero, A.M., Sultan, B., Bossuet, J., Cottenceau, J., Bonatti, M. et al. 2023. Co-production opportunities seized and missed in decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture – How do we practice the “best practice”? Agricultural Systems, 212: 103775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103775

Dressel, M. 2022. Models of science and society: transcending the antagonism. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1): 241. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01261-x

Duncan, J. & Claeys, P. 2018. Politicizing food security governance through participation: opportunities and opposition. Food Security 10(6), 1411–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0852-x

Edenhofer, O. & Kowarsch, M. 2015. Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 51: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017

Eigenbrode, S.D., O’Rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J.D., Althoff, D.M., Goldberg, C.S., Merrill, K., Morse, W. et al. 2007. Employing Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science. BioScience, 57(1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570109

Elliott, K.C., McCright, A.M., Allen, S. & Dietz, T. 2017. Values in environmental research: Citizens’ views of scientists who acknowledge values. PLOS ONE, 12(10): e0186049. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186049

Enenkel, M. & Kruczkiewicz, A. 2022. The humanitarian sector needs clear job profiles for climate science translators now more than ever. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(4): E1088–E1097. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0263.1

Ericksen, P.J. 2008. Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18(1) : 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002

European Commission. 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. ISBN – 978-92-79-04826-5. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442

European Commission. 2021. Recommendations to the United Nations’ Food Systems Summit Scientific Group from the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group to assess needs and options to strengthen the international Science Policy Interface for Food Systems Governance. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/cc5f7973-3002-481e-9328-c3315d5dfa1f_en?filename=hleg_recommendation_to_the_unfss_scientific_group_web.pdf

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Webb, P., Sonnino, R., Fraser, E. & Arnold, T. 2022. Everyone at the Table: Transforming food systems by connecting science, policy and society. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/440690

FAO. 2021. The White/Wiphala Paper on Indigenous Peoples’ food systems. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4932en

FAO. 2022. FAO Science and Innovation Strategy. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cc2273en/cc2273en.pdf

FAO. 2023. The Action Plan 2022–2025 for the implementation of the FAO Science and Innovation Strategy. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7559en

FAO. 2024. The unjust climate. Measuring the impacts of climate change on rural poor, women and youth. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9680en

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. 2021. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. 2024. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. Financing to end hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in all its forms. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1254en

Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C., Page, G. et al. 2020. Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Research & Social Science, 70(2020): 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724

FSIN (Food Security Information Network) & GNAFC (Global Network Against Food Crises). 2024. Global Report on Food Crises 2024. Rome. Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC) 2024 (fsinplatform.org)

Global Alliance for the Future of Food. 2021. The Politics of Knowledge: Understanding the Evidence for Agroecology, Regenerative Approaches, and Indigenous Foodways. https://futureoffood.org/insights/the-politics-of-knowledge-compendium/

Gluckman, P.D., Bardsley, A. & Kaiser, M. 2021. Brokerage at the science–policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1): 84. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00756-3

Gough, D., Davies, P., Jamtvedt, G., Langlois, E., Littell, J., Lotfi, T., Masset, E. et al. 2020. Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement. Systematic Reviews, 9(1): 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5

Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. 2000. Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Controversies. In: N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. pp. 163–188. Sage

Gustafsson, K.M., Díaz-Reviriego, I. & Turnhout, E. 2020. Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs. Earth System Governance, 4: 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050

Hainzelin, E., Caron, P., Place, F., Alpha, A., Dury, S., Echeverria, R. & Harding, A. 2023. How Could Science–Policy Interfaces Boost Food System Transformation? In: J. Von Braun, K. Afsana, L.O. Fresco & M.H.A. Hassan, eds. Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation. Cham, Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5

HLPE. 2020. Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf

HLPE. 2022. Data collection and analysis tools for food security and nutrition: towards enhancing effective, inclusive, evidence-informed, decision making. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ab8bba96-365d-4a7f-ae9f-557e9c778f2f/content

Hubbs, G., O’Rourke, M. & Orzack, S.H. 2020. The toolbox dialogue initiative. The power of cross-disciplinary practice. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440014

Hulme, M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change. Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. First edition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200

Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General. 2019. Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. New York, United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/gsdr/gsdr2019

Ingram, J. 2011. A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change. Food Security, 3(4): 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0149-9

IPBES. 2013. IPBES/2/17 decision IPBES-2/4. https://www.ipbes.net/document-library-catalogue/ipbes217

IPES-Food. 2023. Who’s Tipping the Scales? The growing influence of corporations on the governance of food systems, and how to counter it. https://ipes-food.org/report/whos-tipping-the-scales/

Iyalomhe, F., Jensen, A., Critto, A. & Marcomini, A. 2013. The Science–Policy Interface for Climate Change Adaptation: The Contribution of Communities of Practice Theory. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(6): 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1619

Ketcham. 2022. How Scientists From the “Global South” Are Sidelined at the IPCC. The Intercept, 17 November. https://theintercept.com/2022/11/17/climate-un-ipcc-inequality/

Khan, S.J., Förster, J., Brenck, M., Raab, K., Rangel, S.G. & Wittmer, H. 2023. Guidebook on national biodiversity platforms: Connecting Nature and People. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ. Leipzig, Germany; Cambridge, UK. UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). https://www.ecosystemassessments.net/content/uploads/2023/04/Guidebook-on-National-Biodiversity-Platforms-UFZ-and-the-NEA-Initiative-1.pdf

Koetz, T., Farrell, K.N. & Bridgewater, P. 2012. Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9152-z

Koerner, J., Dinesh, D., Loboguerrero, A.M. & Campbell, B. 2020. Lessons learnt from CCAFS - 10 years scaling climate-smart agriculture Insights from the review of CCAFS scaling activities, 2019. Center for International Forestry Research. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107416

Kowarsch, M. 2016. A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy. Vol. 323. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Cham, Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6

Kowarsch, M., Jabbour, J., Flachsland, C., Kok, M.T.J., Watson, R., Haas, P.M., Minx, J.C. et al. 2017. A road map for global environmental assessments. Nature Climate Change, 7(6): 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3307

Krause, N.M., Freiling, I., Beets, B. & Brossard, D. 2020. Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8): 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385

Maas, T.Y., Montana, J., Van Der Hel, S., Kowarsch, M., Tuinstra, W., Schoolenberg, M., Mahony, M. et al. 2021. Effectively empowering: A different look at bolstering the effectiveness of global environmental assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 123: 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.024

Masaki, T., Custer, S., Eskenazi, A., Stern, A. & Latourell, R. 2017. Decoding Data Use: How do leaders source data and use it to accelerate development? Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary. https://www.aiddata.org/publications/decoding-data-use

Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B.S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R. & Moore, H. 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001

Millstone, E. & Lang, T. 2023. An approach to conflicts of interest in UK food regulatory institutions. Nature Food, 4(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00666-w

Nature. 2022. Farming feeds the world. We desperately need to know how to do it better. Nature, 611(7936), 425–426. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03694-5

Obermeister, N. 2020. Tapping into science advisers’ learning. Palgrave Communications, 6(1): 74. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0462-z

Ojanen, M., Brockhaus, M., Korhonen-Kurki, K. & Petrokofsky, G. 2021. Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 118: 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.002

Oliver, K. 2022. Assessing national institutional capacity for evidence-informed policymaking: the role of a science for policy system. In: K. Kriger & L. Melchor Fernandez, eds. LU, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/951556

Pallett, H. & Chilvers, J. 2013. A decade of learning about publics, participation, and climate change: institutionalising reflexivity? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(5): 1162–1183. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45252

Pielke, R. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110

Pohl C. & Wuelser, G. 2019. Methods for Coproduction of Knowledge Among Diverse Disciplines and Stakeholders. In: K. Hall, A. Vogel & R. Croyle, eds. Strategies for Team Science Success. Pp. 115-121. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_8

Porciello, J., Skidan, V., Ambikapathi, R., Boonabaana, B., Guerra, J., Lidder, P., Piñeiro, V. et al. 2024. The State of the Field for Research on Agrifood Systems. Juno Evidence Alliance, CABI. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/junoreports.2024.0001

Reiners, D.S., Reiners, W.A. & Lockwood, J.A. 2013. The relationship between environmental advocacy, values, and science: a survey of ecological scientists’ attitudes. Ecological Applications, 23(5): 1226–1242. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1695.1

Riousset, P., Flachsland, C. & Kowarsch, M. 2017. Global environmental assessments: Impact mechanisms. Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, 77(C): 260-267. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v77y2017icp260-267.html

Rosado-May, F.J., Urrieta Jr., L., Dayton, A. & Rogoff, B. 2020. Innovation as a Key Feature of Indigenous Ways of Learning. In: N.S. Nasir, C.D. Lee, R. Pea & M. McKinney De Royston, eds. Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning. First edition, pp. 79–96. New York, NY: Routledge, 2020., Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-6

Ruggeri Laderchi, C., Lotze-Campen, H., DeClerck, F., Bodirsky, B.L., Collignon, Q., Crawford, M.S., Dietz, S., Fesenfeld, L. et al. 2024. The Economics of the Food System Transformation. Food System Economics Commission (FSEC), Global Policy Report. https://foodsystemeconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/FSEC-Global_Policy_Report.pdf

Sarkki, S., Niemelä, J., Tinch, R., van den Hove, S., Watt, A. & Young, J. 2013. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science–policy interfaces. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct046

Sarkki, S., Tinch, R., Niemelä, J., Heink, U., Waylen, K., Timaeus, J., Young, J. et al. 2015. Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces. Environmental Science & Policy,54, 505–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016 

Singh, B.K., Arnold, T., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Broerse, J., Brunori, G., Caron, P., De Schutter, O. et al. 2021. Enhancing science–policy interfaces for food systems transformation. Nature Food, 2(11): 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00406-6

Singh, B.K., Fraser, E.D.G., Arnold, T., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Broerse, J.E.W., Brunori, G., Caron, P. et al. 2023. Food systems transformation requires science–policy–society interfaces that integrate existing global networks and new knowledge hubs. Nature Food, 4(1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00664-y

Skelton, M. 2021.Orders of social science: understanding social-scientific controversies and confluence on what “high-quality” knowledge and “good” adaptation is. Frontiers in Climate, 3: 589265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.589265

Steel, B., List, P., Lach, D. & Shindler, B. 2004. The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: a case study from the American west. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2003.10.004

Stevance, A-S., Bridgewater, P., Louafi, S., King, N., Beard, T.D., Van Jaarsveld, A.S., Ofir, Z. et al. 2020. The 2019 review of IPBES and future priorities: Reaching beyond assessment to enhance policy impact. Ecosystems and People,16(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1702590

Stewart, R. & Patiño-Lugo, D.F. 2024. National-level models to support the use of evidence in agrifood systems. R. & Patiño-Lugo, D.F. (2024). National-level models to support the use of evidence in agrifood systems policy. ISBN 978-92-5-138560-9. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9437en

The Global-Hub on Indigenous Peoples’ Food Systems. 2021. Rethinking hierarchies of evidence for sustainable food systems. Nature Food, 2(11): 843–845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00388-5

Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A. & Hulme, M. 2016. What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18: 65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004

Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. & Louder, E. 2020. The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

UN. 2023. Making food systems work for people and planet UN Food Systems Summit +2. Report of the Secretary-General. https://www.unfoodsystemshub.org/docs/unfoodsystemslibraries/stocktaking-moment/un-secretary-general/unfss2-secretary-general-report.pdf

UN CEPA. 2021. CEPA strategy guidance note on the Science-policy interface. https://publicadministration.un.org/Portals/1/Strategy%20note%20science%20policy%20interface%20March%202021.pdf

UNEP. 2017. Strengthening the Science-policy Interface: A Gap Analysis. Nairobi. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/strengthening-science-policy-interface-gap-analysis

UNEP. 2021. Reflecting on the Past and Imagining the Future: A contribution to the dialogue on the Science-Policy Interface. Nairobi. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/38118

UNESCO. 2016. The Future of Scientific Advice to the United Nations. A Summary Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations from the Scientific Advisory Board. Paris, UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245801

UNESCO. 2017. Guidelines on Sustainability Science in Research and Education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260600

Van Berkum, S., Dengerink, J. & Ruben, R. 2018. The food systems approach: sustainable solutions for a sufficient supply of healthy food. The Hague, Wageningen Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.18174/451505

Van Den Hove, S. 2007. A rationale for science–policy interfaces. Futures, 39(7): 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004

Van Der Hel, S. 2018. Science for change: A survey on the normative and political dimensions of global sustainability research. Global Environmental Change, 52: 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.005

Van Zwanenberg, P. & Millstone, E. 2005. Analysing the role of science in public policy-making. In: P. Van Zwanenberg & E. Millstone, eds. BSE: risk, science and governance. pp. 11–38. BSE: risk, science and governance. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525813.003.0002

WEF. 2024. The Global Risks Report 2024. World Economic Forum. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024

Welch, E., Louafi, S., De Donà, M., Xuan Nguyen, A. & Raab, K. 2024. Global science–policy interfaces related to agrifood systems : a desktop review of structures and common patterns. ISBN 978-92-5-138633-0. Rome, FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cd0054en

WHO. 2017. EVIPNet Europe: Situation Analysis Manual. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/358808

WHO. 2021. Evidence, policy, impact. WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/350994/9789240039872-eng.pdf

Wynne, B. 1996. May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In: S. M. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne, eds. Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. pp. 44–83. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221983.n3

Young, J.C., Watt, A.D., van den Hove, S. & the SPIRAL project team. 2013. Effective interfaces between science, policy and society: the SPIRAL project handbook. http://spiral-project.eu/sites/default/files/The-SPIRAL-handbook-website.pdf

Zougmoré, R.B., Partey, S.T., Totin, E., Ouédraogo, M., Thornton, P., Karbo, N., Sogoba, B., Dieye, B. & Campbell, B.M. 2019. Science-policy interfaces for sustainable climate-smart agriculture uptake: lessons learnt from national science-policy dialogue platforms in West Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(5): 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1670934