Thumbnail Image

Follow-up Report on Recommendations of the Evaluation of FAO Cooperation with India in the period 2003-2008

mei/11










Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Evaluation of FAO cooperation with India in the period 2003-2008
    Final Evaluation Report. March 2009
    2009
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    At its May 2005 session, the FAO Programme Committee (PC) made recommendations for the work programme of the Evaluation Service for the period 2006-09. Following a suggestion made by the Committee in 2004 (CL 127/12, paragraph 49), the PC recommended that FAO should undertake “an evaluation drawing conclusions on the basis of evaluations of the totality of FAO’s work with individual countries”. The country evaluation in India was the sixth such exercise conducted by FAO and met the PC’s request at its May 2007 that future evaluations should also include countries other than Low-Income Food-Deficit Countries.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Management Response to the Evaluation of FAO Cooperation with India in the period 2003-2008 2014
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The timing of the evaluation was fortuitous as the FAO reform gained momentum and India continued to enjoy economic growth while simultaneously grappling with the goal of inclusive development. When the vision of FAO is a world without hunger and India is home to one quarter of the under-nourished people in the world; then India must be a country of vital interest to FAO. Unfortunately at this level, the evaluation was not informative. The previous FAOR when commenting on the draft evaluation re port said “The evaluation appears to focus mainly on the “trees” and far too little on the “forest”. In fact, the term “trees” may be too generous as many of the projects that the report discusses are tiny. Large portions of the report are taken up with inconsequential regional projects” Although the report provides inputs against purpose One (paragraph 4) of the evaluation, they were insufficient to generate debate at the higher-level from which such changes within FAO must be driven. In a sens e this is a lost opportunity.
  • Thumbnail Image

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.